See
http://www.buergerwelle.de:8080/helma/twoday/bwnews/stories/124/
Joanne - the evidence is NOT weak re adults and leukaemia and ELF
magnetic fields, that
is a
governments' and industry spun myth. Adult leukaemia association
evidence is actually
stronger
than that for children:
Risk
Analysis, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00889.x
Letter to the Editor
Michael J. O’Carroll and Denis L. Henshaw,
2007. Comment on “Developing Policy in the
Face of Scientific Uncertainty: Interpreting 0.3 µT or
0.4 µT Cutpoints from EMF
Epidemiologic Studies” by Kheifets et al. in Risk Analysis, 25(4),
927–935
Table II. Epidemiological Studies Reviewed by CDHS (2002) and the Corresponding Number
of Odds Ratios >1.0, Number that Were
Statistically Significant, and
p Value for Each Set
Positive Studies
Significant Positives
Number of
Disease Studies Number p Value Number p Value
1. Childhood leukemia 19 16 0.0014 3 0.01
2. Adult leukemia 43 32 0.0007 11.5 <<0.00001
3. Adult brain cancer 32 25 0.0007 6 0.0001
4. Miscarriage 37 27.5 0.0015 9 <<0.00001
5. ALS
7 6 0.06 3 0.0004
6. Childhood brain cancer 12 6 >0.5 2 0.04
7. Female breast cancer 24 17.5 0.012 5.5 0.0001
8. Male breast cancer 16 11.5 0.04 –
9. Alzheimer’s disease ** 6 4 0.34 2.5 0.001
10. Suicide
8 6.5 0.02 3 0.0007
11. Heart disease 8 6.5 0.02 5.5 <<0.00001
** The
evidence for Alzheimers has become significantly stronger since this
was published.
Best wishes
Alasdair
Subject: Power Line Pollutants Pose Health
Risks (Discovery News link below) - Childhood Leukemia risk NOT
WEAK
To Whom It May Concern: [ No email address for Discovery News
? ] I posted on Facebook that evidence is weak re adults NOT
children. Moulder at Univ. of Wisconsin has been a fierce adversary
for a long time re EMF/EMR studies that link adverse symptoms and/or
disease. The EMF RAPID Interagency Committee Report (Dr. Imre Gyuk,
Dept. of Energy never presented to
Congress) reports conclusions re low levels of electric
fields (referred to as "magnetic fields" at the time) being linked to
immune deficiency and childhood Leukemia, with weaker association to
adult Leukemia.
Industry and those who are paid by electric industry (other
entities also), have been getting away with this "criminalistic
terminology" way too long! The word "weak" to define
evaluations re adults is and has been used to minimize findings re
childhood Leukemia. "Weak association" applies to adult Leukemia
only!
While the $46 mil EMF RAPID Study results re childhood Leukemia
and immune deficiency is/was based on low level electric field
exposures and not evaluations of pollutants near power lines; Prof.
Denis Henshaw, Head of Human Radiation Group, Univ. of Bristol, UK, has
identified aerosols/corona ions, close to and downwind from high
voltage power lines years ago.
http://www.electric-fields.bris.ac.uk/d_henshaw.html
..........
While it may be a very long time before issues re direct chemical
exposures and sorting as to specific amounts of each may be involved,
when it comes to evaluating childhood Leukemia, we would be
perpetuating already long delays insofar as "Precautionary Principle"
when it comes to informing the medical profession, parents, public in
general, etc., if we do not start to emphasize the extremely important
fact that any close electric field exposure from an electric meter,
electric appliance/device, telephone equipment including cordless
phones, and/or any item that has a speaker (magnet) is more likely than
not, the primary trigger (extracellular and intracellular "biochemical
changes") for immune changes that promote chronic inflammation that
starts the precancerous process! See Prof. Henshaw's comments re
melatonin. My website also has some important facts re melatonin
(there are hundreds of studies):
www.guineapigsrus.org ........
In the meantime, it is, of course, important to identify and
compare levels of all chemicals in children with Leukemia and any other
cancer, and applies to adults, as well as pets. However, studies re
the close exposures (those that can be mitigated in some way, often by
moving items esp. close to bodies and beds) are a necessity since there
are very few persons that are not exposed to radio towers, power lines,
cellular antennae, wireless, cell phones, etc. From my perspective
-- a non-accredited EMF/EMR activist/researcher for two decades, it
is my belief that close electric field exposures, particularly, bedroom
exposures, quickly affect respiratory systems, especially in children,
and this may be due to increased ozone close to their faces due to
mechanistic action of various objects and/or devices close to head of
bed(s).
While first "moving it," we also can not afford to ignore the
powerful evidence re importance of sleep, the help that melatonin
supplementation offers even after practicing "prudent avoidance" (due
to varying signals surrounding everyone) while studying the wide
variation of biochemical exposure possibilities. We do not need to
create panic re distances from high voltage power lines and cellular
antennae when we first must assess whether infants and pets with
Leukemia -- asthma patients re infants and pets also -- have higher
levels of pollutants in their blood from being in very close
proximity to "moveable objects" mentioned.
"Distance" is considered when evaluating the pine trees in
Sweden. I can share that our pine trees that are almost directly
below two high voltage power lines look terrible! Indications of
"stress" -- too many pine cones and very thin branches. But, I
also report "improvement" re husband's dementia after moving his
electric clock and starting him on melatonin. "Asthma" for Bud is
almost never addressed now, and his inhalers sit in his dresser
drawer.
Take care of our little ones - human and animal - and
ourselves - Joanne
Joanne C. Mueller
Guinea Pigs "R" Us
731 - 123rd Avenue N.W.
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55448-2127 USA
Phone:
763-755-6114
Email:
jcmpe...@aol.com
(12-11-09)