Comment #2 on issue 64 by
H.E.R.O....@gmail.com: Can't resolved detecting
download URL of 64-bit builds by GET
https://code.google.com/p/omaha/issues/detail?id=64
funny how your issue# matches your 'problem'.
what on earth made you think 1.1 or 2.0 is in any way related to a 32-bit
platform? especially if the stable version doesn't show such suffix at all
and--as you mentioned by yourself--the links are 'older' than the advent of
a dedicated 64-bit version.
so, as a brief conclusion: no, your estimation definitely won't lead you to
a 64-bit D/L-link but unfortunately I'm also not knowing which link you
should use instead.
as the updater isn't part of the chromium project it also isn't open
source, hence you can't just skim through the code in order to retrieve all
relevant urls. but you could try and install some 64-bit version and then
use wireshark in order to sniff the url it is referring to.
oh, and let us know if you have success (including the links you got, of
course...)
good luck!
ps: I kinda disagree with post #1 as I would expect these links lasting
pretty long.
pps: get yourself a new translation program; your current one suxxx.
ppps: I expect the 'ap=' appendix to be the very same for the 64-bit
version.
pppps: oh, utf-8 formating leads to an error 400 (bad request); ok, good to
know.