> As I recall, the class was put off indefinitely because there were no deliverables and there was a lack of equipment.
Course was going to run either way.
Your suggesting and facilitating the link to Math 4 provided the things...
1. A focus for the deliverables. Before meeting you, the deliverables
were wide open, based on student interest. By connecting us with Math
4 you helped provide a greater focus for the course. Students could
still have wide flexibility in implementation platform (Python, eToys,
Scratch, Squeak, etc) and choice of deliverable (game, drill ware,
etc) but they would be centered around 4th grade Math. This was
incredibly useful
2. Your efforts allowed us to dodge the whole lab security/lab manager
issues which was great, and allowed us to loan each student a machine
to develop natively on if they chose rather than having to pass around
my three machines from group to group. Also incredibly helpful.
As far as the evolution of the project outside of RIT, you know better
than I and I stand corrected. The goal of my suggested edit was only
to clear up the impression that the course did not exist, or would not
have run, had we not met.
Your side of the story, should make for an excellent presentation.
Your and Fred's presence and participation in the classroom, in IRC,
in pointing me to Mel, who I was then able to bring in as a speaker,
etc all made significant contributions to an incredibly successful
effort with long reaching consequences in and outside of RIT. It
should be told
The presentation It is not one that needs to be co-created or
co-edited. It should just be accurate on the circumstances around the
RIT side as you will make it on your side; as your corrections to me
indicated it needs to be.