Mosaic Reading 2 Answer Key
Jennell Venier
If only we could gin up an equation that put American reading and math wars to bed as successfully as Erwin Schrdinger extinguished the wave/particle debate. But what a big step Tim Shanahan takes in that direction using the "softer" tools of example and analogy.
All hail Tim Shanahan!
Looks like there is some overlooked history regarding the distinctions between skills and strategies. In our 1983 paper Becoming a Strategic Reader, Paris, Wilson and Lipson described strategies as intentional versus skills as automatic in the same way that other cognitive skills develop. We characterized strategies as the conscious analysis of skills that is necessary during initial learning, trouble shooting, and teaching, and we said that the strategies become automatic skills with extensive practice. These ideas and others were elaborated in more detail by Afflerbach, Pearson, & Paris (2008) in an article in the Reading Teacher entitled Clarifying Differences Between Reading Skills and Strategies Strategies. I humbly suggest that readers might find the historical papers informative about this enduring issue.
I wonder why Professor Paris didn't also mention their more recent chapter on the topic:
Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P. D., & Paris, S. (2017). Skills and strategies: Their differences, their relationships, and why they matter. In K. Mokhtari (Ed.), Improving reading comprehension through metacognitive reading strategies instruction (pp. 33-49). Lanham, MD: Rowman
& Littlefield.
I adopted Paris et al.'s definitions both in my dissertation on the strategies underlying the performance of discourse synthesis and my book on the explicit instruction of L2 reading comprehension strategies.
Excellent article. In my opinion we teachers often spend too much time on terms and labels or trying to have students understand something in the way we do rather than on expanding understanding and then applying what they know and can do. I think we should think more in terms of increasing capacity and less in terms of labeling and identifying.
Peter and Scott,
I'd be happy to cite you here, but I didn't think it was really necessary. You weren't the first to define strategies as intentional or skills as automatic, so I really don't think I needed to cite you on that (in fact, I could you fault you for not citing earlier works on that especially given the nature and length of your article). I myself had one page handouts that covered this ground back in the 1990s. The questioner was asking for clarity -- your article on this is very good but it took you thousands of words to say what I said in hundreds. Clarity is not its strength. Given when your article was written, it didn't pay much attention to where knowledge and language fit into this dynamic (one wouldn't have expected it to), which this reader wanted to know about. I wouldn't turn to your piece for insights on that because you didn't address it. I certainly would encourage readers who want to read more about skills and strategies to read the article that these gentlemen cited -- it is a good one -- but it really isn't necessary for answering this readers' question.
tim
I'm trying to figure out how to configure an Experience Builder Suitability Modeler widget and one prereq is to create a WRO service. So I follow the instructions to create the mosaic dataset in ArcGIS Pro using the Weighted Raster Overlay Service toolbox and that seems to go OK. My problem is when I run the publishing step with the ArcGIS Pro "Create Hosted Imagery Layer" command, it appears to hang with the Data Upload as "Staged" and the Output layers "Pending". Is there something I'm missing - am I supposed to do something more to move to to completed? I can't even find a log file that might give some hints.
Hi Don,
Before you tried to host the mosaic, did you right click the mosaic in the catalog pane and select 'Optimize -> Analyze Mosaic Dataset'? This will show you any errors and I think is vital to do for the tool to function correctly.
I was running into the same issue with it hanging on "Pending" and I recalled having to do this for another way of sharing a Mosaic as a hosted web layer. It seemed to work for me when doing after this process.
Hi @jhindleCRG
I am running into a similar issue that you might have an answer to. After using "Analyze Mosaic Dataset" to make sure everything is ok, I tried sharing the Mosaic to AGOL, using "Create hosted imagery". When I am trying to run this tool, my Data Upload status just says "Failed". I don't get any errorcode, or any suggestions on what might be the issue at hand. I also cannot find anything on the web on this issue.
Any suggestions?
Thanks!
Do you have an ArcGIS Image online license? You could try using the new imagery portal to try it. I seem to run into issues even hosting basic imagery layers through ArcGIS Pro, most of the time it seems like a network issues on Esri's end.
Thank you for your quick reply.
I have an ArcGIS Image for ArcGIS Online, with administrative privileges. I have not managed to upload a WRO service directly in the portal.. I am able to upload a mosaic dataset to agol using the imagery portal, but not including the WRO serivice.
I have had very similar issues. After a lot of trial and error, I am able to created a mosaic dataset and configure using the Weighted Raster Overlay Service toolbox. However, when I attempt to share using the Create Hosted Imagery Layer, the tool appears to hang at Creating dynamic imagery layer...
It will create a hosted image on AGOL but I get the error Unable to establish a secure HTTPS connection to the layer. The layer, ..., cannot be added to the map. Has anyone successfully hosted the weighted raster overlay mosaic dataset on AGOL?
If 1 Corinthian 9:9 establishes a principle, what then might be the allegorical meaning of Deuteronomy 22:6-7? And, where there might be symbolism or allegory with meaning beyond the literal sense of the Law, could this have been the understanding by people of the time, rather the literal?
Footnote - see also the related question 'What hermeneutic is Paul employing in his approach to 1 Corinthians 9:8-10?' which differs because it doesn't address extension of the principle, nor specifics of Deuteronomy 22:6-7
The answer to the OP is yes. Paul was doing what other rabbis did by quoting a commandment from the Torah and applying it more broadly. Regarding Dt. 22:6-7 one such opinion was given by Maimonides, who said that:
Although he lived much later than Paul, Maimonides' interpretation follows an exegetical principle that was practiced by the rabbis in ancient times. I would not call either of these interpretations "allegorical" however. Rather are both examples of how a rabbinical teacher might apply a law more broadly than the literal text indicates. In both cases, these teachers interpreted a commandment about the ethical treatment of animals to apply to the treatment of human beings in a similar situation.
Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.This is the first and great commandment.
And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
The many specific laws given throughout the Torah expand God's law further by giving very specific cases, but by no means do they define every possible application.One must use these as examples, taking the underlying principle and applying it to other situations.
(Other cultures used similar methods to teach morality, sop's Fables perhaps being the most familiar example.Keep his "The Goose That Laid The Golden Eggs" in mind while reading the rest of this answer.)
But taking the mother, indirectly causing her offspring to die, not only disrespects God's creation ("the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is" is part of the Ten Commandments), it also destroys a potential food source for other travelers ("thou shalt not steal").
A modern example, though in the opposite way, would be clear-cutting forests.Cutting the larger trees without damaging the smaller ones will ensure the continued existence of the forest for the future.Clear-cutting everything can mean no more forest, and can result in floods, mud slides, etc.
I have several hundred TIFFs that I want to load in to a File Geodatabase (FGDB) raster mosaic. ArcGIS allows you to load one image, then mosaic additional images into the same raster. I'm trying to do this with FME.
2) Read several TIFFs (e.g. select 2 TIFFs or specify *.tif in the Reader) and send to the same FGDB raster dataset (i.e. no fanout on the Writer) with Drop Table set to "No" for obvious reasons. This loads the first image then fails on the second with "ERROR Failed to write raster data tile when writing to raster dataset 'TIFF2'. The error number from ArcObjects is: '-2147467259'".
3) Using the Path Reader to get the TIFF names, then sending these 1 at a time to a second Workspace using the WorkspaceRunner (Wait for Job to Complete = Yes). The second Workspace loads the TIFF into the raster dataset. This works fine when only 1 TIFF is in the source folder, but as soon as I add another to the source folder, the second Workspace crashes with "ERROR Failed to write raster data tile when writing to raster dataset 'TIFF'. The error number from ArcObjects is: '-2147467259'" when trying to load the additional image, but the the original one loads/reloads fine. Again on the Writer, Drop Table is set to "No".