Thanks for staying on top of this Jim. I am buried this summer and it
is really taking a toll on the time I can provide to this sub-
committee. I think you should be leading this effort, as you have
mostly been doing so already. I was not at the last OLC meeting and
I'm still not sure that I will be at the meeting Thursday, so would
probably be best if you plan to lead the discussion. Having said
that, I have a few comments related to the information you have
summarized so far -
Definition - I wonder if the definition needs to be slightly reworked
to be friendlier to the more recent trend for leasing small plots of
ag land for personal use. Also, "ag co-ops" are becoming more popular
where someone purchases a "share". Do we feel like the definition is
flexible enough to cover some of these new trends? I also found a
definition (follows) that is broader than the one provided in the
subdivision regulations and that is interesting to consider in the
context of Missoula County.
The National Research Council (1988) defines “agriculture” broadly as
to:
…encompass the production of agricultural commodities, including food,
fiber, wood products, horticultural crops, and other plant and animals
products. The terms also include the financing, processing,
marketing, and distribution of agricultural products; farm production
supply and service industries; health, nutrition, and food
consumption; the use and conservation of land and water resources;
development and maintenance of recreational resources; and related
economic, sociological, political, environmental, and cultural
characteristics of the food and fiber system.
I also noted the reference to mitigating impacts in the growth policy
but then there is no reference to mitigation relative to agric or
suggestion of what mitigation might consist of, in the subdivision
regulations. Yet, they describe mitigation relative to floodplains
and drainage in other sections. Karen, perhaps I missed something -
if so, let me know. Seems like an opportunity for improvement though.
I'm glad to see the interest by OLC in developing possible mitigation
programs for agricultural impacts, though I will push to see these
developed in tandom with mitigation for native plant community impacts
as well, to avoid unintended consequences - can't miss an opportunity
to sound like a broken record :).
Just a few thoughts for now, I'll try to send more tomorrow in case I
can't be at the meeting on Thursday.
Carolyn
P.S. Karen the links were not working in the minutes to access the
Land Use Clinic report and presentation - could you email a copy of
those products to me. Thanks.