I'd like to discuss spam if anyone is still interested

[Lightning2]

While I would like to make spammers feel pain, that approach may not
be the best way. I think that Zoemail.com has the right idea, but
perhaps not the best solution for everyone, since it's a hosted, paid
service.

I'd like to discuss it if anyone is interested, either on or off this
list.

Thank you,
Chris
okopipi...@kumiko.us

[Liam K.]

I'm still here :)

Zoemail sounds similar to Boxbe. However, I think the right idea is not filtering, but reporting and/or leeching.  Right now I report all my spam to SpamCop, KnujOn, and the Australian SpamMATTERS program. I would like to report to Castlecops SIRT as well, but they haven't enabled email submissions yet and I report using the gKnujon/gSpamcop scripts available here.

SpamItBack! is also a great idea on the leeching side, but it hasn't been updated in years so therefore I don't bother to use it.
--
Liam K.

[Kirk Bailey]

go for it.

Liam K. wrote:
> I'm still here :)
>
> Zoemail sounds similar to Boxbe. However, I think the right idea is not
> filtering, but reporting and/or leeching. Right now I report all my
> spam to SpamCop, KnujOn, and the Australian SpamMATTERS program. I would
> like to report to Castlecops SIRT as well, but they haven't enabled
> email submissions yet and I report using the gKnujon/gSpamcop scripts

> available here <http://www.submanifold.be/triade/misc/gknujon/gknujon.html>.

>
> SpamItBack! is also a great idea on the leeching side, but it hasn't
> been updated in years so therefore I don't bother to use it.
> --
> Liam K.
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 5:56 AM, Lightning2 <niels...@gmail.com
> <mailto:niels...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> While I would like to make spammers feel pain, that approach may not
> be the best way. I think that Zoemail.com has the right idea, but
> perhaps not the best solution for everyone, since it's a hosted, paid
> service.
>
> I'd like to discuss it if anyone is interested, either on or off this
> list.
>
> Thank you,
> Chris

> okopipi...@kumiko.us <mailto:okopipi...@kumiko.us>
>
>
>
> >
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.10/1586 - Release Date: 8/1/2008 6:59 PM
>

--

Cheers!
-Kirk D Bailey

THINK
+-----+
.*. | BOX |
..* +-----+
*** THINK

[CooperFan9390]

I haven't been following this for a while, but why was the blue frog
idea not possible in a decentralized way again?

On Aug 2, 8:09 pm, Kirk Bailey <delibera...@verizon.net> wrote:
> go for it.
>
>
>
> Liam K. wrote:
> > I'm still here :)
>
> > Zoemail sounds similar to Boxbe. However, I think the right idea is not
> > filtering, but reporting and/or leeching.  Right now I report all my
> > spam to SpamCop, KnujOn, and the Australian SpamMATTERS program. I would
> > like to report to Castlecops SIRT as well, but they haven't enabled
> > email submissions yet and I report using the gKnujon/gSpamcop scripts
> > available here <http://www.submanifold.be/triade/misc/gknujon/gknujon.html>.
>
> > SpamItBack! is also a great idea on the leeching side, but it hasn't
> > been updated in years so therefore I don't bother to use it.
> > --
> > Liam K.
>

> > On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 5:56 AM, Lightning2 <nielsent...@gmail.com
> > <mailto:nielsent...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> >     While I would like to make spammers feel pain, that approach may not
> >     be the best way. I think that Zoemail.com has the right idea, but
> >     perhaps not the best solution for everyone, since it's a hosted, paid
> >     service.
>
> >     I'd like to discuss it if anyone is interested, either on or off this
> >     list.
>
> >     Thank you,
> >     Chris

> >     okopipi-disc...@kumiko.us <mailto:okopipi-disc...@kumiko.us>

>
> > No virus found in this incoming message.

> > Checked by AVG -http://www.avg.com