C-track Public Access

[Ara Kistner]

Thisis the public access site for the Minnesota appellate courts case management system, known as P-MACS. It provides access to the status of appeals filed with the Minnesota Supreme Court and the Minnesota Court of Appeals. For cases that were open in either the Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court on March 3, 2003 and later, P-MACS provides the following information about the case: case title, appellate case number, parties, attorneys, docket entries, and links to orders or opinions issued in the case after March 3, 2003. For cases that were archived before March 3, 2003, only case title, case number and abbreviated party information are available.Filings are processed within one to two business days in the order in which they are received, and are available on PMACS after processing is completed. As a reminder, if searching for a closed case, you must uncheck the Exclude Closed/Archived box. While every attempt has been made to ensure that the information provided through P-MACS is accurate, there are no warranties ensuring accuracy. To verify information obtained from this site, or to obtain appeal information not available on this site, please contact the Office of the Clerk of Appellate Courts 651-291-5297.P-MACS can be viewed using Internet Explorer. It may also work with other browsers.Comments, suggestions and questions regarding P-MACS are welcome. Please note that all comments and suggestions will be reviewed, but a personal response to all submissions may not be possible.** Email Support ** mailto: pmacs....@courts.state.mn.usTo receive email or text updates from the Appellate Courts: Subscription Signup

The South Carolina Judicial Department recently unveiled its online public index system, C-Track, which provides public access to information regarding cases filed with the Supreme Court of South Carolina and the South Carolina Court of Appeals. Users can view events and other basic case information online. One of the the best features of this system is the ability to view documents filed in appellate cases, such as motions, briefs, records on appeal, orders, and opinions. Currently, only appeals from the Court of Common Pleas and administrative tribunals pending or filed as of May 1, 2012, are available online; however, non-public, sealed, or confidential cases are not available for public viewing on this site.

For almost three years, the South Carolina Judicial Department has been working with LTCourtTech, a Thompson Reuters' Company, to customize its nationally recognized C-Track Appellate Court Case Management System to meet the needs of the Supreme Court of South Carolina and the South Carolina Court of Appeals. C-Track has now been fully implemented within the appellate courts to automate the processing of cases through those courts.

The South Carolina Judicial Department is pleased to announce that public access to C-Track is now available on the Judicial Department Website at While at first access will be allowed only to limited types of civil appeals, the ultimate goal is to provide web-based access which will approach the level of access available to the public at the appellate courthouse. In many cases, the system will show the registry of the events in the case with any documents associated with a specific event. More detailed information about what is currently available is provided when users access the link provided above.

Records that have been expunged, shielded, or sealed by court order are not available to the public. In addition, the following records are not open to the public without a court order or a special provision of the law:

In some instances, you may be able to ask the court to keep some or all information in a case private. There are several different ways to ask that the court limit public access to a case record, depending on your situation. You may see or hear the terms seal, shield, and expunge, depending on the type of case. These terms all refer to keeping certain information in a case private or, for expungement, destroying case records.

To shield a Failure to Pay Rent case filed on or after March 5, 2020 and before January 1, 2022, you should use form DC-CV-116. To be eligible for shielding, the COVID-19 pandemic must have affected your income and ability to pay rent, leading to your landlord filing the Failure to Pay Rent case.

If your case meets certain conditions, you may be able to ask the court to expunge a criminal record or juvenile record. Expungement removes information about a case from court and law enforcement records. To learn more, see Expungement.

Some information in a court document is automatically kept private by law. A separate request to keep the information private is not required. In these cases, you may need to let the court know if a document you are filing has legally protected information such as a social security number or tax return. Read about notifying the court of restricted information.

eDCA MOVED TO ACIS

Starting September 11, 2023, please visit the Appellate Case Information System (ACIS) located at for access to all public dockets. Please note some case dockets and documents may be restricted by rule, statute, or otherwise unavailable to the public. Attorneys of record and self-represented litigants must register to obtain access to documents in their cases. It is important to note that your ACIS account is replacing your eDCA account.

Attorneys of record who registered with ACIS for access to Supreme Court and/or First DCA do not need to re-register.

Access the registration guide here.

Anyone submitting an application, proposal or report to the NIH must include the PMC reference number (PMCID) when citing applicable papers that they author or that arise from their NIH-funded research.

Awardees should only use a list or summary to highlight how shared resources lead to noteworthy impact(s). Neither a list nor summary is required. If awardees provide a list, it does not have to be complete.

My NCBI will provide the current public access compliance status for your paper. A video overview is available here.

For papers published more than 3 months before an application, proposal and report is submitted:

List the PubMed Central reference number (PMCID) at the end of the full journal citation for the paper in NIH applications, proposals and reports. A PMCID is the only way to demonstrate compliance for these papers.

Note, NIH awardees are responsible for ensuring that all steps of the NIHMS submission process are complete within three months of publication. Note: no special notation is required when manually citing publications that do not fall under the public access policy.

The PubMed Central reference number (PMCID) is different from the PubMed reference number (PMID). PubMed Central is an index of full-text papers, while PubMed is an index of abstracts. The PMCID links to full-text papers in PubMed Central, while the PMID links to abstracts in PubMed. PMIDs have nothing to do with the NIH Public Access Policy.

For Submission Methods C and D, use the NIHMSID: Example: Cerrato A, Parisi M, Santa Anna S, Missirlis F, Guru S, Agarwal S, Sturgill D, Talbot T, Spiegel A, Collins F, Chandrasekharappa S, Marx S, Oliver B. Genetic interactions between Drosophila melanogaster menin and Jun/Fos. Dev Biol. In press. NIHMSID: NIHMS44135

I'm currently working on large C++ Qt based project which is a about to go under a major re-factor of its public API and it would be nice to have a tool that can generate a report on which methods have been added or removed from build to build.

Doxygen can generate an XML file that has all the class / member / method information that you could then mine for building class trees. It would then be a matter of comparing trees. Some useful post-processing scripts / utilities can be found @

If you're compiling with gcc, egypt is a novel approach that uses the intermediate RTL to produce call-dependency graphs - it seems like it wouldn't be that difficult to use a similar method to generate basic API information.

Add an automatic build step that uses nm on Unix-likes and whichever Windows tool (dumpbin?) to dump a list of exported functions. Use some scripting language to strip off unimportant bits that change from build to build, like addresses.

Try abi-compliance-checker. This tool shows added/removed symbols in your API, changes in parameters/data types and other changes from the binary compatibility point of view. It's cross-platform. The best performance is on Linux, but it's able to run on Windows and Mac too.

If you use git you should create a new branch and use a shell script to compare all header files that define the API bwetween the branches. If you have not yet done so, you should use the impl pattern for your API header files to make the library binary compatible/more stable for future versions. See the entry for d_pointer in the Qt developer wiki or the part about D-Pointers in the KDE techbase.

In addition to the option of using Doxygen to roll your own analysis tool I would also suggest looking into using the BSC Toolkit. This allows you to access the code/class browser information generated by MS compilers and is available for free. The toolkit provides programmatic access to all definitions, usage references, source and line numbers, parameters, access modifiers, etc. Names are provided in their mangled form and facilities are included for translating them to human readable format if necessary.

If courtroom closure is being requested by a party or the trial judge to a court proceeding and the reporter is present in the courtroom, the reporter should stand and politely address the trial judge. The reporter should identify his or herself by name as well as the outlet that person represents and then respectfully assert that the federal and state constitutions provide a strong presumption in favor of open court proceedings. Then the reporter should respectfully ask the court for a continuance, so a hearing may be held on closure and the reporter may contact an attorney to appear on behalf of the journalist (or his or her outlet) and the public at large.

3a8082e126