Teddie Goldenberg
unread,Apr 27, 2009, 7:54:48 PM4/27/09Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to OFCS
I've been brainstorming the ramifications of being able to, as a community, approve of crediting certain activities. Here's some things I've thought of:
* Credit students for going to school (if they maintain passing grades). Not just college students, but the most young students (kindergarten and up). The principle would be that a child is doing a service for all of society by achieving in school. This negates the "value-added time" problem that Ithaca hours has (where a dentist is paid 3 hours per hour, for example).
* Credit mothers for being pregnant, giving birth, and nursing. That is, if they're not drinking and smoking the whole time. I dunno, there could be a lot of pitfalls in this one. Then again, this would be like a built-in maternity leave.
* Credit people for recycling. It would mean measuring the amount of recycled materials, but doing so basically reverses some of the debt from their consumed products.
* Credit people for working on open-source software projects like this one. If a community uses the software, isn't that a tacit approval of the programmers' labor? I guess we can't make it retroactive, however. I mean, imagine what people will think if we create a credit system where all of the developers (us) are already rich?
* Credit people for restoring land to its natural state. If you're replacing a mountaintop removed by mining, what you're doing is mitigating the social debt that mining company has incurred.
Those are some thoughts I have. I worry that credit may be too "easy" with OFCS, but like Ed pointed out, it's not for us to design a system with equilibrium; different OFCS implementations will have to be tried before we achieve anything even near equilibrium.
-=Teddie=-