Ontario is revising the Special Diet Allowance to make it more accountable to taxpayers and compliant with the recent Order of the Human Rights tribunal of Ontario.
By revising the allowance, the province will help social assistance recipients who have eligible medical conditions receive the special diets they need to help manage their conditions.
The Special Diet Allowance will be one of a broad range of targeted benefits that will be considered in the context of Ontario’s comprehensive social assistance review, which begins January 2011.
Changes are informed by the recommendations of the Special Diets Expert Review Committee and the findings of the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario. Changes include:
The changes mean that not everyone who currently receives the Special Diet Allowance will be eligible to continue receiving it.
People who are eligible to receive the Special Diet Allowance will need to apply under the revised schedule once new forms are available. All payments under the current schedule will end by July 31, 2011.
The revised Special Diet Allowance schedule will take effect on April 1, 2011. People who are eligible to receive the Special Diet Allowance under the revised schedule will have to submit a new application.
New application forms are expected to be available in February 2011. Current Special Diet Allowance recipients will be sent a copy of the new application form by mail.
All payments under the current schedule will end by July 31, 2011.
The revised schedule will include:
Changes coming to the Special Diet Allowance
Ontario is changing the Special Diet Allowance. The changes will make the program more accountable and comply with the recent Order of the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.
The changes include:
The revised Special Diet Allowance schedule — the list of conditions eligible to receive a Special Diet Allowance — is informed by the recommendations of the Special Diets Expert Review Committee. This committee was composed of a variety of health experts and professionals from across Ontario, including:
The Special Diet Allowance is one of many social assistance benefits that will be considered in the context of Ontario’s upcoming social assistance review.
The revised Special Diet Allowance schedule will take effect on April 1, 2011. People who are eligible to receive the Special Diet Allowance under the revised schedule will have to submit a new application.
New application forms are expected to be available in February 2011. Current Special Diet Allowance recipients will be sent a copy of the new application form by mail.
All payments under the current schedule will end by July 31, 2011.
Chris
So, both morbid obesity (BMI 40+) and anorexia nervosa qualify for dietary supplements? Interesting logic.
Chris
I get $42.00 for type 2 diabetes!!!
not a lot of difference but that $20. would be nice!
Annie
That's absolutely illogical. If those of us within a healthy weight range are able to eat nutritiously then so can those suffering obesity. It's about choices, unless there are other medical factors to consider. You've inadvertently changed the discussion to what are the costs associated with eating healthy foods.
Everyone should have access to healthy alternatives. Obese people don't require larger quantities of the same kinds of foods as you and I eat, they require the SAME quantities. Therefore, to achieve healthy weights, we should all be eating the same quality and quantity of foods. This obviously means that for weight maintenance purposes costs are equal.
The essential point is this: I am presently a healthy weight and I don't require a special diet allowance. If I can afford to buy healthy foods to maintain a healthy weight than so can a comparatively obese person. This is very simple. For anyone who thinks that I'm being insensitive, or don't understand the issue, a decade ago I lost a significant amount of weight and have kept it off, even now as an ODSP recipient. I know what I'm talking about.
So, yes, the government is indeed supporting morbid obesity, and whats worse is that it will do so at the cost of funding other programs. How ridiculous!
Chris.
if it would be worth anything annie i would have had that looked into. both my doctor and nutritionist had the old suppliment for conditions that ODSP paid for per condition. diabetes was not distinguished into any types except on the pregnancy allowance [which i see in the SDA form gestational is included as a separate condition now] so the $63 was for blanket diabetes; no specification of type 1 or 2. which of course ALL of us though was completely ridiculous. as far as all of us were concerned, diabetes should be one of the blanket conditions that auto-qualified for the full benefit of $250 right there since it is ONE that is completely revolving around diet in a particular way.
Psychiatric drugs alone lead to what is called metabolic syndrome,
whereas, they lead in themselves to increased bad cholesterol,
increased blood lipid levels and increased body mass index, which
is a precursor to diabetes.
| Robbie, Its unfortunate that you feel compelled to make this personal...Your assumptions and insinuations couldn't be further from reality. Now, for the rest of your response. You said, "you may only be able to afford cheap highly processed food...not everyone has enough $$ left to eat properly. Fresh fruit/veg even in season is expensive." Frankly, this statement isn't true. This is not a factual statement. Anyone can eat healthy, and I do mean anyone, regardless of budgetary limitations. Let me explain... I recently read a book titled "Switch", by Dan Heath, which, in chapter 2, includes the story of a Third World community in Vietnam whose members live life on the verge of daily starvation. A few of the painfully poor in this particular community are able
to thrive. That is that they are remarkably healthy and well fed given their lack of access to even basic food items. How is this possible? These outliers unwittingly learned to gather small shrimp and crabs from nearby rice paddies and then to mix these with their daily rice meals. These simple food additives provided life-saving amounts of protein and vitamins to Third World diets. So, its very easy and affordable to eat healthy, life-sustaining meals, if you know how. If people who survive on pennies a day can do it, then so can anyone. Another book I recommend, "No Excuses: The True Story of A Congenital Amputee Who Became A Champion in Wrestling and in Life." So, Robbie, no excuses! For more information following these links: Chris --- On Thu, 12/2/10, Robbie <robbi...@persona.ca> wrote: |
Frankly, this statement isn't true. This is not a factual statement. Anyone can eat healthy, and I do mean anyone, regardless of budgetary limitations. Let me explain...I recently read a book titled "Switch", by Dan Heath, which, in chapter 2, includes the story of a Third World community in Vietnam whose members live life on the verge of daily starvation. A few of the painfully poor in this particular community are able to thrive. That is that they are remarkably healthy and well fed given their lack of access to even basic food items. How is this possible? These outliers unwittingly learned to gather small shrimp and crabs from nearby rice paddies and then to mix these with their daily rice meals. These simple food additives provided life-saving amounts of protein and vitamins to Third World diets.
chris....
|
How about this story that was on this week on the news about a man on
a potato diet and lost 20 pounds over 60 days?
|
This is an excellent post. Thank you, Angela.
Uppity
-------Original Message------- |
| Robbie, I'm genuinely sympathetic to your situation, and for the record, I do believe that ODSP should make good eating less burdensome. The point that I'm trying to make is that although the regular benefit might not enable us to eat well, it certainly can allow us to eat healthy. This is
the critical distinction. What you've described in your most recent post is what I would call, or categorize as, eating well. And you should be entitled to eat those everyday foods independently of added support from loved ones. Its shameful that you cannot. For someone like me, the reality is, although I can't enjoy the frequent rich variety of foods that you might, with discipline and creativity, I can still eat nutritiously. Regarding the reference to the book, "Switch." I chose to refer to the story about the Vietnamese villagers who plucked shrimps and crabs from nearby rice paddies, not to imply that Canadians should switch to fishing as an alternative to buying food. That would be impractical. Instead, I chose to reference the story to highlight the fact that some of our so-called problems are not so difficult to solve. That sometimes the challenges we experience in life are actually about how we think -- our perceptions, attitudes, and the information we possess, rather than about factors beyond our control. Chris |
Angela, Please see my responses to Star and Robbie on this topic. It's not so difficult to eat in accordance medical and nutritional guidelines. Adding cooked chicken, or sausage, to whole wheat pasta and marinara sauce has a per meal cost of about a buck, or two. A low salt, low calorie wiener and a whole wheat bun has a retail cost of less than a buck. Raisins, celery and peanut butter, combine for a highly nutritious cheap snack. Eggs, one of the most nutritiously dense foods available, are extremely cheap. Chris |
| Uppity and Angela, I am well acquainted with eating disorders. One of the medical factors that qualified me for ODSP was bulimia. I developed the condition during my battle with weight-loss as an early 20 something and have fought the regular urges to binge and purge ever since. Furthermore, as a way to help myself and as a way to hopefully one day give back, I am enrolled in the psychology program at Queen's University. Presently, I'm taking Abnormal Psychology, which directly addresses eating disorders. I have never received a special dietary allowance, nor would I ever want to. Frankly, my experience has been that bulimia is like an addition. Having extra money for food would be counterproductive. The best practice for a bulimic is strict dietary control: a regular schedule of 4 or 5 small portion meals, everyday. This
doesn't require a dietary allowance. People with eating disorders need emotional support, counseling, and perhaps, for anorexics, initially, hospitalization. For anyone wondering how I can afford to pay tuition...Queen's allows students to keep a "tab", which means that students can pay the costs of their tuition gradually over the course of the school year. I make small contributions towards the balance of my student account each month. Chris --- On Sat, 12/4/10, Uppity Woman <uppity...@gmail.com> wrote: |
Angela, Please see my responses to Star and Robbie on this topic. It's not so difficult to eat in accordance medical and nutritional guidelines. Adding cooked chicken, or sausage, to whole wheat pasta and marinara sauce has a per meal cost of about a buck, or two. A low salt, low calorie wiener and a whole wheat bun has a retail cost of less than a buck. Raisins, celery and peanut butter, combine for a highly nutritious cheap snack. Eggs, one of the most nutritiously dense foods available, are extremely cheap. Chris |
| Robbie, Its unfortunate that you have to do this, all because I had the audacity to challenge your categorical belief that eating healthy is impossible under the auspices of ODSP. I've only spoken to my experience. Now you want to divide between those you deem as worthy of disability supports and those who aren't. I guess because you feel threatened by some of my personal views, you've decided that I'm of the latter? You have a really poor attitude, perhaps, your disability has gotten the better of your humanity? For anyone interested in the perils of psychosomatic labels, please read a recently release book entitled, "My Imaginary Illness", by Chloe Atkins. She is a brilliant scholar, teaching at the University of Calgary. For nearly 15 years Dr. Atkins was labeled as suffering from
conversion reaction, a form of psychosomatic illness. Her symptoms digressed to such a state that she was hospitalized and on life support. Finally, she was properly diagnosed with a rare presentation of a rare autoimmune disease. She was demonized by the medical community and truly nearly died and the entire time medical doctors told her it was all in her head. She is an amazing person and I'm proud to own her book. http://www.amazon.ca/Imaginary-Illness-Uncertainty-Prejudice-Diagnosis/dp/0801448875/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1291504227&sr=8-1 And by the way, Dan Heath challenges his readers to find what he calls the bright spots.He says, look for the models that are working and try to figure out why that is so that those practise can be co-opted for other's to replicate. His book is exactly relevant to this dialog. And as for Kyle
Maynard, he's just an amazing guy. He is a 4x amputee, no hands or feet, and yet he still lives a remarkable life. He now owns a chain of fitness centres throughout the US and is a former champion wrestler. Amazing! Finally, isn't this supposed to be a supportive group? A few here seem to use this site as a way to project their hatred at life onto others, or to denigrate others for not sharing that hatred. Okay, so we're poor and sick, aren't we among equals? I don't share the hopelessness and helplessness orthodoxy, that's me! I can see why several people have recently chosen not to participate here... Chris |
| Angela, Housing and food are separate issues. Obviously housing costs vary widely depending on size of family and community of residence, etc. Food costs may also vary by geographic location, for example, people living in north, or in remote regions. Otherwise, food prices are nearly universal across the province. It seems some want to conflate a number of issues. Food consumption is easily controlled, housing consumption is not. If you'll remember, this conversion started b/c I said that its illogical to have both anorexics and obese qualify for a dietary allowance. No one here has explained what special foods obese people need? Why are their food costs higher? What foods do they need to eat that are so much more expensive? Everyone has to be concerned about cholesterol, and hypertension, and cancer. We all have to
be mindful about what we eat. Furthermore, if there is a category of eligibility in the dietary allowance for obesity and the only criteria is heaviness, then obviously losing weight is the solution, which doesn't require a special diet. Here's a link to "Health Club Diet for Obesity", all the recommended foods are ordinary and easily affordable. Its amazing to me how dogmatic some are being on this issue. These few are being absolutely categorical. There's no truth in anything I've posted? Wow. Chris |
| Blakiepoo, Yes, yes, and yes! Everything that you've written is exactly correct and is exactly as I intended. You know want it is I'm talking about. I find that whenever someone here challenges the accepted orthodoxy, they risk being demonized. Its highly unfortunate because all that does is shutdown the debate, or cause people to leave. We need to be more supportive, and to leave behind the derision and attacks. |
|
|
Peanut butter, eggs, whole grain bread products, canned tuna, oatmeal, sliced bacon and ham, beans and lentils, whole wheat pasta, marinara sauce, brown rice, frozen and canned vegetables, ground beef, chicken drumsticks, prepared bagged salad, potatoes, apples, bananas, raisins, onions, wheat germ, garlic, ginger, milk, and yogurt.
| Angela, That's only from $250 per person, per month. Yeah, that's cheap. That's less than 10 bucks a day, or about 3 bucks per meal. The average fast food combo is now about 8 bucks. Some people spend 12 bucks a day only on cigarettes. Chris --- On Sat, 12/4/10, abrowne <browne...@yahoo.com> wrote: |
Robbie, (I apologize in advance for errors of grammar or spelling, I was typing faster than usual) I think you have a profoundly distorted perception of me and unfortunately you seem to have misinterpreted my position on the special diet as a bias against certain categories of people, which couldn't be further from reality. Let me tell you about myself.... I became sick in 2001 while in university. I left school voluntarily that year for what was supposed to be only one semester. I did this b/c my doctor told me to. At the time was experiencing serious cognitive distortions, I had just lost a huge amount of weight, and I was bulimic. I had been attending
school full-time, doing very well, and worked part-time to support myself. I had no help from family, my tuition was paid by government loans. After leaving school, for nearly a year I worked in various retail jobs. Then, b/c my medical condition worsened, I quite to became a cleaner...I went back to the campus where I had once been a student to clean toilets, urinals, and classrooms. I had no sense of entitlement, no sense that I was better than that job. So, for the next 5 to 6 years I cleaned washrooms and classrooms all across that campus, in spaces where I had once studied earnestly. I earned 8 to 9 bucks an hour the entire time, and although I worked 37.5 hours/wk, I was still living in poverty. Furthermore, I had no medical insurance. I was forced to pay for expensive SSRI's and anticonvulsant medications from my $1200 a month paycheck. In order to help cover my living costs I
took another job in 2006 delivering newspapers. For nearly two years, I worked 7 days a week, every week, cleaning during the day and delivering newspapers at night. It was hell, it was grueling. I still have all the pay stubs as proof. I had been raised in a farming community and I was taught to tough it out, to be independent, and so I was. In 2008, my emotional state deteriorated to the point that I wanted to be incarcerated. I was exhausted, physically and emotionally. I had never been involved with the police, nor had I ever engaged in any kind of criminal activity, but going to jail seemed to be a better alternative than endlessly cleaning toilets and delivering newspapers for the rest of my life. So here's what I did... In 2003, I had lost my drivers license because of an unpaid fine. I saw this as a unfair tax for being poor. In 2008, I had appealed to MTO for an exception. I even spoke to
someone in the Ministers' office. I explained my socioeconomic and medical circumstances. At the time I wanted my license back so that I could accept a supervisory position with the cleaning company where I worked. I had been offered the job, it was mine, and it paid $18/hr, huge money to me. That money would have made a tremendous difference in my life and I told this to MTO and the Minister's office. You see, b/c my license was suspended for an unpaid fine while I was still a G2 driver, in Ontario, after 3 years of expiry, you have to restart as a G1, again. This meant that I couldn't accept the job. That I couldn't escape sickness and poverty because the system wouldn't let me. To be clear, my license was suspended, and subsequently expired, only for administrative reasons. I had never had an accident, I had a near perfect driving record and was an able driver having been a farm worker throughout my
youth. This refusal by MTO had a spiral effect on me and so, although I couldn't accept the job, I began driving anyway. My doctor believed in was impulsive acts of self destruction. Ultimately, I ended up in court 3 times: I was once stopped for not making a complete stop at a sign, once for driving 70 in 55, and then once for "suspicious driving". I wanted to go to jail, I just wanted to stop the cycle of sickness and poverty. Eventually I was able to meet the prosecutor responsible my file to avoid jail. I agreed to the arrangement that was offered only b/c my doctor recommended ODSP, he said that the program could help. I had never heard of ODSP back then. Once I was accepted, I then applied for employment supports, which were refused. Since late 2008, I've reapplied 3 more times and have been rejected each and every time. Once b/c I faxed in the application, once b/c I might be eligible
for EI employment supports, and then once my application was "lost." Seriously, I was told the office lost my application. Moreover, I've applied for work on my own. Try explaining so-called conversion disorder, or cognitive distortions, or generalized anxiety disorder to a potential employer. Yet, that doesn't stop me for applying for work. Once, again I've applied for a job as a cleaner, still haven't been contacted. Ideally, I would get a job as a truck driver, or cab driver. I know how to operate heavy equip, unfortunately I still can't due that b/c I owe the province nearly $2000 in traffic fines related to my driving while under suspension charges. With one hand they give and with the other they take away...Its illogical. Today, I have a partner whose legally blind. One of my good friends is bipolar. I volunteer at a local Salvation Army thrift store and a nearby retirement home,
whenever possible. I am absolutely dedicated to helping the disempowered in our society. I know the issues of sickness, disability, and poverty all too well and I know how the system works against us. While a minimum wage cleaner, I met a lot of people who had been equally ground-down by the gears of an ineffective, unsympathetic, and overly bureaucratic system. New immigrants, the poor, the mentally impaired, the illiterate, many of these people became my friends and I got deeply involved in a few of their lives. Once I agreed to accept legal custody of a coworker after she had been detained by police during a manic episode. I care about these people and care about our common issues. Frankly, I don't want to be sick, I don't want to be on ODSP, who does? People I went to school with now own condos, nice cars, and have interesting professions and security. Have they worked harder than me? Than you? Than any of
my former coworkers? Their degrees and designations were subsidized by taxpayers. Most work for the federal government and are making the very rules and regulations that the rest of us must abide. Some are married and travel frequently. I can't relate to that and they can't relate to me. They don't understand our issues, and yet they make the rules. Some hold the view that people "on the system" are lazy, weak, stupid, or frauds...Yet, you and I know otherwise, we all know otherwise. When I criticize the rules of the system, I'm not criticizing you, or anyone else, personally, as its beneficiary. I'm only questioning whether the best option is in use, or if there might be more constructive, more helpful alternatives. Chris |
Startears,
You priced things looking for the maximum prices you could pay for
them. When I shop, I look for the lowest prices to buy things, and I
never pay the kinds of prices you quoted. Actually I usually pay
about half of the low end of what you listed there. By stocking up on
things when they're on sale, you're able to hold out until the next
sale and never have to buy those things full price. You just have to
mind the amount you have left. Of course that doesn't apply to fresh
food.
| Angela, What I understand of your position is this: You say that your household food costs are disproportionally high relative to your household income, and that, therefore, to make food costs for you and your family more affordable, you buy cheaper foods. Moreover, you say that these cheaper foods are of inherently poor quality -- that's why their cheaper -- and thus, they cause you and your family weight gain, up to the point of obesity, and contribute to poorer health overall. Angela, unfortunately, I don't think your situation is uncommon. Certainly most, if not all, of ODSP households share your experience, given the information I've seen. So, my question is this: what foods do obese people need to eat that the rest of us don't need to eat [to maintain good health]? This is critical, there
must be a dietary basis for ODSP having made this decision? If not, then is this yet another arbitrary ruling by ODSP? Furthermore, here's the key point of contention I have regarding this issue, and why I feel that it lays bare the program's rules and regulations as being onerous, political, arbitrary, etc. According to ODSP eligibility criteria for the special diet, once an obese person reaches a BMI of less than 40, they lose the dietary allowance. Frankly, this is confusing. Either the allowance is necessary to maintain a healthy weight, or it is not? I find it surprising that you would be defending this type of criteria? It seems to me that once the allowance is removed, the beneficiary will yo-yo to a higher weight, perhaps, even higher than they were previously, as is so often the case for those battle weight issues. A temporary allowance does nothing to address any of
the real structural issues in an obese person's life...Its obviously arbitrary and not based on medical data or other medical considerations -- and that's been my point from the outset of this conversation. I fully support helping people suffering from obesity. However, how a few more bucks every month for food will actually help anyone to lose weight is beyond my level of comprehension. In terms of public health policy, both the World Health Organization and the Centre for Disease Control acknowledge that factors beyond diet and exercise can, and do contribute to a person being overweight. However, both of these public health authorities also state that bodyweight can be managed regardless of a person's genetic disposition, or medical condition, i.e., hypothyroidism, or mobility.... My take away from the information available thru the CDC and WHO websites is that no one's weight is predetermined and that anyone can manage
their weight when empowered by the proper tools. Chris |
| Blackiepoo, Thanks for your kind remarks. Immediately after I issued those comments, I contacted the moderator and asked that they not be posted. Apparently, that's not an option. I wanted to retract them because of the level of candor I used and the extent to which I exposed some personal details. Whenever I reflect back on the last 5 or 6 years, I often get emotional. I think that's apparent in some of what I said. The level of frustration and anger I can experience, is at times overwhelming. I'm sure many here share my sentiment. Sorry, for being so emotional. Chris |
|
|
| Blakiepoo, |
"With what you wrote about food prices, it was kind of a big proclaimation and should really have a source for that info if it is fact." |
My response: For example, this week, No Frills has "No Name" bacon on sale for $2.99. I bought two packages that will last until the end of the month. Walmart has Kraft Dinner on sale, 0.49 per box. I bought six boxes of the whole wheat version, which I'll prepare using skim milk and Becel. When I travel for groceries, I use public transit. Typically, I spend several hours traveling for the best available deals. Chris |
| Star, As a diabetic you should be receiving the full dietary allowance. I completely understand that diabetics have novel dietary needs. As for my Third World analogy, I believe its applicable because, in life, often times our behavioural habits and the information we possess can be improved to our benefit. For instance, many in that Vietnamese village that I referred to, weren't aware that shrimp and crab additives in their meals could provide them with the essential proteins and vitamins that they were lacking. And, I say with all do respect, you have proved this point by asking why I mentioned ginger and garlic in my listing of healthy foods. Although this items may not be independently consumable (not foods), they certainly are additives that will enhance the nutritional value of any meal, and that's the
point. I agree, we all should be eating better, unfortunately that's not the reality and we're best to do whatever we can for the sake of our own health, which requires creativity. Google uses of ginger and garlic for their respective medicinal properties. Chris |
|
|
When I travel for groceries, I use public transit. Typically, I spend several hours traveling for the best available deals.
Chris |
"With what you wrote about food prices, it was kind of a big proclaimation and should really have a source for that info if it is fact."My response: For example, this week, No Frills has "No Name" bacon on sale for $2.99. I bought two packages that will last until the end of the month. Walmart has Kraft Dinner on sale, 0.49 per box.
That was me, StarTears. I don't canned and haven't for years. It is
not worthwhile and my energy to make it for one person, not when I
have some good and bad days every day. Bad days - I am talking about
depression on some days. On good days, I go out to the library, dollar
store, exercise, etc.
Thanks so much for your support and kindness. If nothing else, my story might make a few others a little more grateful about their own circumstances knowing that things could be worse....That they could be me. Lol
Chris
How many here have ever had to use the services of a food bank?
Star,Liver is an excellent food and one that I forgot to mention.It sucks to be diabetic, it can really complicate other health matters.
Hi Star Tears...I was the one talking about tomatoes, but I didn't talk about acidity. I have a problem with the ones that are sold in the store because all the stuff they put into them.
mar
kw
Annie
Sent wirelessly from my BlackBerry device on the Bell network.
Envoyé sans fil par mon terminal mobile BlackBerry sur le réseau de Bell.
|
Some of us are very protective of our privacy.
Uppity
-------Original Message------- |
Anyway when I told the Food Bank this they took down my information,
asked me about dietary requirements and said they could send someone
to deliver the next day whereupon I was to show them/give them my
proof of I.D. etc. They keep all the people in a data base so when I
require the Food Bank I call them up, tell them my name, they look my
file up and we go from there. Again they do NOT normally deliver but
because of my situation they will do it.
I also have found that M & M Meats in my area will also allow me to
call in an order and they will deliver and I pay cash for the products.
People I have found, at least in the KW area will tend to help in
situations where someone cannot get out. I ask everytime. The worst
they can say is no, but I find that has not been the case with me.
Guess I have lucky horseshoe underwear.
mar
kw
p.s. I use the direct deposit stub from my ODSP and my driver's
licence as proof of I.D. Plus they can always call and verify as well.
I think I had to sign a form saying I was who I was. It's been so long
I really can't remember.
mar
kw
Michael,
Sorry, if this sounds like a dumb question...What do you mean when you say,"allowed"?
Chris
Subject: Re: [odspfireside: 33234 ] Re: Changes to the Special Diet Program Announced
I am allowed to go to the local food bank once every two months and the food comes in handy...Mike