They must have gotten her birth date and full name from the drivers licence. Do a credit check with that information and viola....credit check and sin number instantly
Annie, you realize you are going to have to pay for those purchases, eventually. Take care, When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns. Frank. _________________________________________________ ![]() --- On Sat, 2/7/09, Annie <hug...@cogeco.ca> wrote: |
|
Which makes it tricky for those of us who desire part time employment when a
SIN is requested on a job application.
It rarely happens but indeed, when I leave it blank they never call me for
an interview.
Then again, despite all the false open attitudes and inclusiveness crap, it
seems hardly anybody wants to hire someone with a disability.
Andrea, Many people have tried them. My husband is on his third service provider, nobody seems to have any jobs. The only job they found for him lasted three days at four hours a day, which was a job they KNEW he was not able to handle. Me? Though I have disabilities and was on his cheque, I am technically eligible, but I never got any support despite repeated requests. I was on my own virtually for everything. Now I am stuck appealing decisions re my husband's ODSP because of having to maintain my business MY way (because they certainly wouldn't give me any help THEIR way). Besides now, I think in this recession, the only concern this government has is to ensure laid off workers have another job to go to, not getting people with disabilities -- who are always in a recession -- to lift themselves out of perpetual poverty. I personally wouldn't even count on the 2% increase. Angela |
Andrea, This has changed in 2006. Only service providers get paid, and ONLY when they placed you and you remain in the job for 13 weeks or more. There is no more technical supports, unless your disability is clearly physical (and this comes from another fund of the E/S). The wage grant is federal, but has since been transferred to the provinces through Employment Ontario. Service providers can tap into this fund, but they have to go to an approved service provider for the targeted wage subsidy to co-ordinate the file. The economics of this results in service providers placing people in the easiest jobs to acquire ... that is, the lowest-wage, the highest-turnover and lowest-skilled. It does not necessarily mean the person is placed in the most appropriate positions. Not saying it doesn't work for ANYBODY, but for those that need more support than what is offered generically, or for those that seek employment beyond the minimum wage, low skill level, it is not a good fit. It is not the fault of the service providers, but when you are obviously not going to get paid to be creative or develop innovative programs like they once were able to, it acts as a sharp disincentive for some service providers. About half of the ones I was aware of when I did this work up until 2005-2006 are no longer doing this work. The only people who were able to get jobs here are working in greenhouses (and none of the ones I knew that got hired there lasted), telemarketing (with mixed results) and retail. People like myself that may need help growing a business, or people seeking higher advanced work are on their own with no help or support whatsoever. |
Angela --- On Sun, 2/8/09, Andrea Heward <andrea...@gmail.com> wrote: |
>>>, and thought it would be nice to send the service provider a daily report<<< |
Who is the service provider? Don't let them getaway with it. You've been robbed and allowed the cheater to rob ODSP. Do you realize you on the hook if ODSP ever does a financial audit. |
Take care, When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns. Frank. _________________________________________________ ![]() |
>>>I'm in Scotiabank too, and any time I've put a cheque in the machine, it's held for five days. <<< |
If you have been a customer for a few years, tell them to stop. There is no reason for this to be done to you. My RBC places no such constraints on me. I would be insulted if they did, especially being a customer for 30 years. |
Take care, When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns. Frank. _________________________________________________ ![]() |
Since we r all talking bout our banksI deal with Canada Trust and they r absolutely terrificPatrice
_________________________________________________
When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.
Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people.
--------------------------------------------------
>There was a man who fell for a Nigerian 419 scam. He got a letter that
>he had won a lottery and cashed the cheque for $500,000. The scam in
>most cases is you cash a large cheque, keep a small amount for your
>payment, and wire the rest through Western Union to someone. The
>cheque comes back fake and you have to reimburse the bank. This man
>lost his house, car, and wife, and is still paying the Royal Bank
>back.
Not sure how one can fall for a scam such as that.
For example, legitimate lotteries don't require surcharges or co-payments
etc.
Based on Canadian laws for unsolicited mail, he could keep the cheque and
not have to forward any payment.
Especially if it was in his name.
I don't see how he'd have to adhere to "foreign" laws pertaining to a
lottery he never entered.
Some banks will charge you for a cheque you deposit that bounces, but not
all will do this.
Other than that the poor guy shouldn't have been out any money. A drag.
I got a similar email at one time. I said, "great! Fork over the loot!"
They emailed back saying I need to pay some weird service charge.
Okay. I said to skim it off the top and send me the balance.
Nope. Can't do that <g>
I wonder if it would suffice to send them a cheque from an account I closed
long ago.
>>>Based on Canadian laws for unsolicited mail, he could keep the cheque and not have to forward any payment.<<< |
You missed the point, the cheque is bogus. If you deposit it, then you withdraw the amount minus your fee and send a money order to the final destination. Then they get the money order, of which, is valid, whereas you get broke as their cheque they gave you bounced. The bank then cease what cash assets you have and take you to court for any balance. So hang onto their cheque if you want to and not forward any money, this way, you can be rich on paper only. Heck, light a cigar with the the cheque, the most expensive smoke you'll ever have. Take
care, Frank. _________________________________________________ |
When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns. ![]() |