Measurement

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Mhelz

unread,
Feb 26, 2010, 2:17:31 AM2/26/10
to ode-users
I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask about this... but this
is where sbook directed me to... so I might as well try, anyway, I'd
like to ask what is the basic unit of mass in JMEPhysics.... when we
use setMass() function, are we talking about grams here...?

Danny Price

unread,
Feb 26, 2010, 6:33:17 AM2/26/10
to ode-...@googlegroups.com
You're getting your units confused.

'grams' is a measure of 'weight'. Weight is the product of mass x gravity. A gram on mars is not the same as a gram on Earth.

I don't think ODE specifies a unit for it's masses because the gravity is variable. The closest science unit would be the mole or molecular mass.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ode-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to ode-...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to ode-users+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ode-users?hl=en.


Oleh Derevenko

unread,
Feb 26, 2010, 6:44:12 AM2/26/10
to ode-...@googlegroups.com
Gramms are the measure of mass, not weight.
And gramm on Earth is the same as Gramm on Mars: it's a quantity of stuff that if you need to achieve acceleration of 1 kilometer per second squared for it you need to apply force of 1 Newton to it.

Oleh Derevenko
-- Skype with underscore

Danny Price

unread,
Feb 26, 2010, 7:52:09 AM2/26/10
to ode-...@googlegroups.com
I looked it up and you are correct. I was taught the old definiton "the absolute _weight_ of a volume of pure water equal to the cube of the hundredth part of a metre". Thanks for the clarification.

Jon Watte

unread,
Feb 26, 2010, 12:57:34 PM2/26/10
to ode-...@googlegroups.com
ODE uses whatever units you want, as long as they are consistent (it applies no conversion constants internally).
Most people feel most comfortable using kilos, seconds, meters, but you can use whatever consistent set of units you want.

Sincerely,

jw


--
Americans might object: there is no way we would sacrifice our living standards for the benefit of people in the rest of the world. Nevertheless, whether we get there willingly or not, we shall soon have lower consumption rates, because our present rates are unsustainable.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages