FW: [External] Comments on Efland Station

29 views
Skip to first unread message

Michael Harvey

unread,
Nov 4, 2020, 6:09:39 PM11/4/20
to Planning Board, Travis Myren, Craig Benedict, Perdita Holtz, Tina Love, Beth Trahos, Lewellyn, Earl

FYI

 

From: Edwards, Charles N <cned...@ncdot.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2020 6:05 PM
To: Jared Cates <ncj...@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Harvey <mha...@orangecountync.gov>
Subject: RE: [External] Comments on Efland Station

 

Mr. Cates,

 

My correspondence dated October 27, 2020 to Kimley-Horn accurately reflects the position of Department staff with regard to review of the traffic study and associated documents listed in the document. I regret if there has been a perception that this differs from the information I provided in response to your questions during our phone conversation. Any deviation is unintentional. I recall that you had inquired as to whether or not NCDOT had plans for road improvements in the area and specifically if there were plans to modify the 160 and 161 interchange and that I responded that neither the current State Transportation Improvement Program or the current Comprehensive Transportation Plan for the area included a specific project to modify this interchange. The absence of an identified project  does not necessarily rule out the need for such a modification with changed conditions such as the addition of traffic volumes either attributable to a significant spike increase generated by a large development such as is currently proposed or through more gradual background growth in future years. In closing, I will also point out  that as stated in the document, the proposed modification of the interchange and the proposed break in the controlled access right of way to accommodate the proposed site accesses will require review and approval by the NCDOT Right of Way Disposal  and Controlled Access Committee as well as the Federal Highway Administration.  The Applicant has not yet made the necessary submittals to these bodies; therefore, the outcome of this proposal is not determined at this time.  I hope that this provides some clarification to this matter. NCDOT will continue to strive to provide accurate and consistent information on this project. With that goal in mind, the referenced traffic study documents and NCDOT correspondence are available at the Orange County Planning Department website at http://www.co.orange.nc.us/1722/Current-Interest-Projects

 

 

C. N. Edwards Jr., PE (Chuck)

District Engineer

North Carolina Department of Transportation

Division of Highways

Division 7, District 1

 

336 570 6833   

cned...@ncdot.gov

 

115 East Crescent Square Drive

P. O. Box 766

Graham, NC 27253

 

NC_State_Seal_Gold_Email

 

From: Jared Cates <ncj...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2020 3:35 PM
To: Edwards, Charles N <cned...@ncdot.gov>
Subject: [External] Comments on Efland Station

 

CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to repor...@nc.gov

 

Chuck - 

 

I hope you are well. I'm confused over your statements in your Review of Traffic Study letter to Kimberley Horne after our conversation in September about NCDOT's concerns about the braided intersection at Exit 160. Can you explain what made NCDOT change their opinion and now have a concern about the braided intersection with any "normal" increase in traffic outside of the proposed Elfand Station development?  That was not your opinion when we spoke in September, so I'm a bit confused. 

 

Sincerely, 

Jared Cates

 



Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Michael Harvey

unread,
Nov 5, 2020, 1:28:14 PM11/5/20
to Planning Board, Perdita Holtz, Tina Love, Craig Benedict

Board members:  this is an email discussed briefly last evening, which we received late Wednesday night.

 

MDH

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages