From: gypsyl...@gmail.com
Subject: Occupy burnersDate: 8 décembre 2011 21:14:20 UTC-07:00
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
<photo.JPG>
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
Yeah, more vague or abstract.
Even if we're not selling it, Occupy is something the Org has been skittish about, I just don't relish the fallout.
I know, I'm willing to go up against multinationals and the feds, bit not the Org. I'm weird.
'Natara
sent from a tricorder-like device with wonky autocomplete, please excuse any typos.
Oo, is there a way to superimpose that sort of round grid on, say a map of the world?
...I'm getting too complicated again. Nevermind.
'Natara
sent from a tricorder-like device with wonky autocomplete, please excuse any typos.
Loves it! (Of course, I like the BRC layout, so I'm kinda biased) Maybe we can re-work the words? It looks like "we the occupy burners people" to me, but that's just one fellas opinionSent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®From: Gypsy Marja Konecki <gypsyl...@gmail.com>Sender: occupy-...@googlegroups.comDate: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 00:55:54 -0700ReplyTo: occupy-...@googlegroups.comSubject: Re: [OWS-Burners] Occupy Burners LogoAnother concept:
<PastedGraphic-1.tiff>
Anyway to put the playa map as a background, or do ya think that'll make the whole thing too "busy"? I'm pretty sure its simply for-profit useage they don't like, but I'll try and get some clarification on that asap. (And yea, that one "reads" better, as far as the text goes)Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®From: Gypsy Marja Konecki <gypsyl...@gmail.com>Sender: occupy-...@googlegroups.comDate: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 01:09:47 -0700ReplyTo: occupy-...@googlegroups.comSubject: Re: [OWS-Burners] Occupy Burners LogoWell I like this better but we need to find out how sensitive BM is to the use of the Man.
<PastedGraphic-2.tiff>
I like all of these, but I like the grid more, as it's more inclusive (it could be ANY map, really, but those 'in the know'... well, know!).
And obviously it should say occupy burners on it, but... maybe not in the middle? I feel that it detracts from the message. I get that you want people to know who you are, but then it's like the only people who are people are occupy burner people.
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Occupy Burners <occupy...@gmail.com> wrote:
Felix: How long do you think it will take for you to get clarification? I like the design with the original logo if we can use it, but not if it will step on toes. I'm not sure how to make the Burner logo more abstract yet still recognizable -- ideas?Anyway if you are not sure about your contacts I have a person or two who can probably find out for us about this.
Kit
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 2:36 AM, <feli...@gmail.com> wrote:
Anyway to put the playa map as a background, or do ya think that'll make the whole thing too "busy"? I'm pretty sure its simply for-profit useage they don't like, but I'll try and get some clarification on that asap. (And yea, that one "reads" better, as far as the text goes)Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®From: Gypsy Marja Konecki <gypsyl...@gmail.com>Sender: occupy-...@googlegroups.comDate: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 01:09:47 -0700
ReplyTo: occupy-...@googlegroups.comSubject: Re: [OWS-Burners] Occupy Burners LogoWell I like this better but we need to find out how sensitive BM is to the use of the Man.
The difference is that your camp logo is for the burn. This is not a sanctioned use; it has, in the Org's eyes, nothing to do with the event; and is in fact related to something they have gone through considerable effort to not take an official position on.
sent from a tricorder-like device with wonky autocomplete, please excuse any typos.
> <occupyburners-logo.png>
On 9 déc. 2011, at 14:24, Ian MacKenzie wrote:
> <occupyburners-logo.png>
How about the man with a guy fawkes mask? There is a considerable amount of anonymous participation, after all...
mel
On Dec 9, 2:59 am, felixx...@gmail.com wrote:
> Loves it! (Of course, I like the BRC layout, so I'm kinda biased) Maybe we can re-work the words? It looks like "we the occupy burners people" to me, but that's just one fellas opinion
> Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gypsy Marja Konecki <gypsylione...@gmail.com>
>
> Sender: occupy-...@googlegroups.com
> Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 00:55:54
> To: <occupy-...@googlegroups.com>
> Reply-To: occupy-...@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [OWS-Burners] Occupy Burners Logo
>
> Another concept:
>
> On 9 déc. 2011, at 00:40, felixx...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Yea, considering it would be a huge win to have the Org support Occupy, its prolly wisest to NOT rattle their nest, so to speak.
> > Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®
> > From: Gypsy Marja Konecki <gypsylione...@gmail.com>
> > Sender: occupy-...@googlegroups.com
> > Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 00:38:19 -0700
> > To: <occupy-...@googlegroups.com>
> > ReplyTo: occupy-...@googlegroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [OWS-Burners] Occupy Burners Logo
>
> > Kind of on that track right now...
>
> > On 9 déc. 2011, at 00:08, 'Natara wrote:
>
> >> Yeah, more vague or abstract.
>
> >> Even if we're not selling it, Occupy is something the Org has been skittish about, I just don't relish the fallout.
>
> >> I know, I'm willing to go up against multinationals and the feds, bit not the Org. I'm weird.
>
> >> 'Natara
>
> >> sent from a tricorder-like device with wonky autocomplete, please excuse any typos.
>
> >> On Dec 8, 2011 10:56 PM, "Gypsy Marja Konecki" <gypsylione...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Kit,
>
> >> I was going for a old, aged parchment look. Like the quintessential Constitution look I think most people think of. I'll do one like that and one without the vintage look.
>
> >> On 8 déc. 2011, at 23:53, felixx...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >>> I think the "policy" is to ignore usage that isn't for profit, but put it on a T-shirt and charge 5 bucks and we might have an issue. I'll do an inquiry and see what I can find out.
> >>> Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®
> >>> From: "'Natara" <twisted...@gmail.com>
> >>> Sender: occupy-...@googlegroups.com
> >>> Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 22:48:36 -0800
> >>> To: <occupy-...@googlegroups.com>
> >>> ReplyTo: occupy-...@googlegroups.com
> >>> Subject: Re: [OWS-Burners] Fwd: Occupy Burners Logo
>
> >>> I suspect that, if the Man aspect is not made more derivative, we invite legal action by the Org.
>
> >>> 'Natara
>
> >>> sent from a tricorder-like device with wonky autocomplete, please excuse any typos.
>
> >>> On Dec 8, 2011 10:43 PM, "Occupy Burners" <occupyburn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> A proposed logo for our group. Inviting her to our group for discussion.
>
> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >>> From: Gypsy Marja Konecki <gypsylione...@gmail.com>
> >>> Date: Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:26 PM
> >>> Subject: Occupy Burners Logo
> >>> To: Occupyburn...@gmail.com
>
> >>> Hello!
>
> >>> I saw on the Occupy Burners Facebook Page that there was a need for a logo. This my first (rough) draft/idea. I intend to get a better font for the "Occupy Burners" text and use a digital image for the Man. I think this is a good representation of my idea. I want it to mimic the Preamble in look. If this is in line with what may have been envisioned so far please let me know. I will continue to work and refine the idea but wanted to throw in my first hand drawn concept for edits/comments/ideas.
>
> >>> Thanks!!!
> >>> Gypsy
>
> >>> ~Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs even though checkered by failure, than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much because they live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat.~
>
> >>> Begin forwarded message:
>
> >>>> From: gypsylione...@gmail.com
> >>>> Subject: Occupy burners
> >>>> Date: 8 décembre 2011 21:14:20 UTC-07:00
> >>>> To: gypsylione...@gmail.com
>
> >>>> <photo.JPG>
>
> >>>> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
>
> PastedGraphic-1.tiff
> 284KViewDownload
> occupyburners-logo.png
> 18KViewDownload
I like it. Thank you for this, Gypsy!
Obviously since we are working in the creative commons, people are free to play with their own derivations or the other ideas we have tossed around. We can have many logos for what we do.
Great working with y'all.
Kit