Dear Members of the Orange County Board of Commissioners,
I am writing to express my deep concern and strong opposition to any proposal that would allow T-Mobile (the successor to LUMOS) to be released from its binding obligation to deliver fiber-optic broadband to rural parts of Orange County—particularly southern Orange County.
This is not just a technical or logistical matter. It is a question of basic fairness, infrastructure equity, and the integrity of public commitments made to those who have, for too long, been underserved.
1.
Southern Orange County Was Always the
Intended Priority
It is outrageous that LUMOS was permitted to begin fiber buildout in the
most densely populated and affluent areas of our county—areas that already
enjoyed high-speed cable internet, often in excess of 100 Mbps, including the northern
subdivisions of the Town of Hillsborough. Meanwhile, the real rural residents,
those that private providers find unprofitable—those most in need of the
support—were pushed to the end of the line. This alone undermines the spirit
and letter of the funding sources intended for underserved areas. But to now
consider abandoning the project before these rural areas are completed would
compound that injustice.
2. Rural Electrification. We’ve been here before, as we all know, Franklin D. Roosevelt stepped in in 1936 for the exact same issue in the form of the Rural Electrification ACT (REA). It didn’t beg or force the local utilities to provide power. Instead, it provided funds to local communities to get the job down themselves. This worked in 1936. What excuse do we have for failing in 2025?
3.
This Project Was Publicly Funded for Our
Benefit
Let me remind the Board: these broadband improvements were not funded solely by
corporate goodwill. They were made possible by federal dollars from the
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act—a once-in-a-generation opportunity to
close the digital divide—and specifically, $10 million allocated to Orange
County for this purpose.
These funds were designated to help communities like ours, where driveways are
long, houses are spaced far apart, and private providers have no financial
incentive to serve. If this contract is abandoned, it will leave residents with
no viable path to modern internet access—and millions of dollars of public
investment stranded.
4.
The Cost of Inaction is Too High
In the absence of this buildout, rural residents are left with pitifully
slow DSL service—often averaging 1.5–3 Mbps—or expensive and unreliable
satellite alternatives. In 2024, that level of service is unacceptable.
Internet access is no longer a luxury—it is as critical as electricity or
running water. President Biden and countless state leaders have said as much,
and the realities of remote education, telehealth, and farm operations demand
it.
5.
T-Mobile’s Financial Capacity is Not in
Doubt
T-Mobile, which now owns LUMOS, reported $11.34 billion in net
profit last year alone. Its stock has appreciated more than 24% over the past
year. The argument that this contract is too costly or inconvenient for them
does not hold water. If they are permitted to walk away from a taxpayer-backed
deal simply because the profit margins aren’t high enough, what message does
that send about our public planning process?
6.
What Must Be Done
I urge the Board to take the following actions:
- Enforce the contract with T-Mobile to the full extent of the law. If
necessary, pursue litigation. Yes, I understand Orange County is
conflict-averse, but in this case, failing to act would amount to abandoning
your constituents.
- If legal enforcement is not pursued, then the County must immediately set
aside funds to complete the rural fiber buildout using other means, whether via
public infrastructure investment or another qualified provider.
It is my understanding that this project was supposed to be complete by Spring
2024. Southern Orange County residents have waited long enough. We deserve
better—and the County must honor its obligation to us.
***********************************************************************
CONFIDENTIAL & PRIVILEGED
Unless otherwise indicated or obvious from the nature of the following communication, the information contained herein is attorney-client privileged and confidential information/work product.
The communication is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this transmission is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. To comply with certain U.S. Treasury regulations, please be advised that, unless expressly stated otherwise, any U.S. Federal tax advice contained in this e-mail, including attachments, is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding any penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service.
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Report suspicious emails with the Phish Alert Button located on your Outlook menu bar on the Home tab.