Dear OBO Community,
The Editorial Working Group is requesting your feedback on a new
principle, Principle 19, called "Stability of term meaning". This
principle codifies already-common practice and provides guidance on
the somewhat disparate implementations of term obsoletion. The
relevant links are:
Discussion:
https://github.com/OBOFoundry/OBOFoundry.github.io/issues/964
Pull Request:
https://github.com/OBOFoundry/OBOFoundry.github.io/pull/2668
File Preview:
https://github.com/OBOFoundry/OBOFoundry.github.io/blob/76d8c2e31e000775dbdada8674ed01d11e0d02da/principles/fp-019-term-stability.md
The summary and purpose are given below:
Summary
The definition of a term MUST always denote the same
thing(s)--known as "referent(s)"--in reality. If a proposed change
to the definition would substantially change its referents, then a
new term with new IRI and definition MUST instead be created.
Purpose
Users of an ontology depend on the stability of its terms and
their meanings. Therefore, changes to the definition of a term
should never substantially shift its meaning. Put another way, its
set of referents MUST remain stable, within reason. That is,
changes to a term definition--or any mechanism to denote meaning,
including elucidations and logical axioms--should not cause that
term to point to different entities than it denotes already.
Best regards,
Darren Natale, EWG Chair