Has anyone tested it against Ruby 3.0.3???

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Lars Elgaard

unread,
Feb 23, 2011, 3:01:06 AM2/23/11
to ObjectiveResource
I am working on a iPhone app that is using a RoR backend running
version 3.0.3.
I can see on git that the source has not been updated for a while.
Has anyone tested the current source code against RoR 3.0.3???

domenico sicignano

unread,
Feb 23, 2011, 9:05:06 AM2/23/11
to objectiv...@googlegroups.com
I just tested the source code downloadded on the railon iphone main page
(with a little modification how explained on the git)
and it works perfecly.


Lars Elgaard Mikkelsen

unread,
Feb 23, 2011, 3:23:02 PM2/23/11
to objectiv...@googlegroups.com
What about if you use coredata to store the data on the phone(in case network is unavailable) when you receive data from the RoR - would there be any problems using managed object class instead of the standard objective-c class in conjunction with objectiveresource??

Lars Elgaard Mikkelsen

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ObjectiveResource" group.
To post to this group, send email to objectiv...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to objectiveresou...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/objectiveresource?hl=en.

Fredrik Jansson

unread,
Feb 23, 2011, 3:29:35 PM2/23/11
to objectiv...@googlegroups.com
I separated my objects into managed and unmanaged objects and created initWithUnmanaged for alla my objects. So internally i only use the managed ones but when i get and set remote i translate  to and from unmanaged objects. Dont know if that is the best way but it works.

Aubrey Goodman

unread,
Feb 23, 2011, 3:46:54 PM2/23/11
to objectiv...@googlegroups.com
Local storage goes beyond the scope of the framework, as does the asynchronous request model. If you want a single framework to do all that, you need to use CoreResource (which is still in alpha). 
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages