[Obi-devel] OBI and Nature Publishing Group's Scientific Data - Roadmap for Engagement

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Susanna-Assunta Sansone

unread,
May 15, 2013, 11:15:56 AM5/15/13
to OBI Developers, Bjoern Peters, Assunta Sansone, Susanna
Dear Bjorn and OBI communities,

the other day I released a blog post proposing a step-by-step process by which community groups can get involved with Scientific Data, the new open access data publication platform by Nature Publishing Group (www.nature.com/scientificdata)
This will serve as a guide as we work with community standards for different scientific fields and cooperate with public data repositories and resources: http://blogs.nature.com/scientificdata/2013/05/13/our-roadmap-to-engagement-your-call

Scientific Data introduces a new content type called Data Descriptor, described here: http://www.nature.com/scientificdata/for-authors/data-descriptor-content-and-submission

Please, see the steps we propose - those relevant to OBI in this case are probably 1-2 and possibly 3.
Wearing my Oxford hat I can say that given the involvement of my team and ISA project in OBI, I will advocate use of OBI in Scientific Data to harmonize the curation in-house. However, if you/OBI see this as an important engagement, we would like to hear from you directly.

Please feel free to send your thoughts by reply email, or comment publicly on Facebook or Twitter.

Kind regards,
Susanna
-- 
Susanna-Assunta Sansone, PhD
skype: susanna-a.sansone
http://uk.linkedin.com/in/sasansone

University of Oxford e-Research Centre
Associate Director, Principal Investigator
www.isacommons.org|www.biosharing.org

Nature Publishing Group
Consultant, Scientific Data
www.nature.com/scientificdata
--

Bjoern Peters

unread,
May 16, 2013, 1:44:16 AM5/16/13
to Susanna-Assunta Sansone, OBI Developers, Assunta Sansone, Susanna
Hi Susanna, 

Thanks for sending the links; this does sound like an exciting initiative. 

It is late, so my first question is probably dumb: Do I understand correctly that with the 'steps we propose' you mean point 1-3 in this document: http://blogs.nature.com/scientificdata/2013/05/13/our-roadmap-to-engagement-your-call

Obviously this sounds like a perfect opportunity to apply OBI, so this would be an important engagement. I am less clear on what that would mean in practice though? 

Best, 

Bjoern 




--
Bjoern Peters
Assistant Professor
La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology
9420 Athena Circle
La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
Tel: 858/752-6914
Fax: 858/752-6987
http://www.liai.org/pages/faculty-peters

Susanna Sansone

unread,
May 16, 2013, 4:26:39 AM5/16/13
to Bjoern Peters, OBI Developers, Assunta Sansone, Susanna
Hi Bjoern,
many thanks for the prompt reply. I will be happy to explain more on the next call, if useful.
Thanks,
Susanna
-- 

Phillip Lord

unread,
May 16, 2013, 5:10:19 AM5/16/13
to Susanna-Assunta Sansone, OBI Developers, Assunta Sansone, Susanna

900$ for a data descriptor and more if you don't want a crappy license.

Is this really the way that we want to go?

Phil


Susanna-Assunta Sansone <sa.sa...@gmail.com> writes:

> Dear Bjorn and OBI communities,
>
> the other day I released a blog post proposing a *step-by-step process by
> which community groups can get involved with*/*Scientific Data*/, the new open
> access *data publication platform* by Nature Publishing Group
> (www.nature.com/scientificdata)
> This will serve as a guide as we work with community standards for different
> scientific fields and cooperate with public data repositories and resources*:
> **http://blogs.nature.com/scientificdata/2013/05/13/our-roadmap-to-engagement-your-call**
> *
> Scientific Data introduces a new content type called *Data Descriptor*,
> described here:
> http://www.nature.com/scientificdata/for-authors/data-descriptor-content-and-submission
> <http://www.nature.com/scientificdata/for-authors/data-descriptor-content-and-submission/>
>
> Please, see the steps we propose - those relevant to OBI in this case are
> probably 1-2 and possibly 3.
> Wearing my Oxford hat I can say that given the involvement of my team and ISA
> project in OBI, I will advocate use of OBI in Scientific Data to harmonize the
> curation in-house. However, if you/OBI see this as an important engagement, we
> would like to hear from you directly.
>
> Please feel free to send your thoughts by reply email, or comment publicly on
> Facebook or Twitter.
>
> Kind regards,
> Susanna

--
Phillip Lord, Phone: +44 (0) 191 222 7827
Lecturer in Bioinformatics, Email: philli...@newcastle.ac.uk
School of Computing Science, http://homepages.cs.ncl.ac.uk/phillip.lord
Room 914 Claremont Tower, skype: russet_apples
Newcastle University, twitter: phillord
NE1 7RU

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AlienVault Unified Security Management (USM) platform delivers complete
security visibility with the essential security capabilities. Easily and
efficiently configure, manage, and operate all of your security controls
from a single console and one unified framework. Download a free trial.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/alienvault_d2d
_______________________________________________
Obi-devel mailing list
Obi-...@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/obi-devel

Susanna-Assunta Sansone

unread,
May 16, 2013, 8:17:46 AM5/16/13
to Phillip Lord, OBI Developers, Assunta Sansone, Susanna
Hi Phil,
one should probably separate the AO/APC discussion from promoting use of
OBI. I advocate the latter.
To (continue to) be successful, imo OBI has to be used widely and
visibly regardless if by an academic or commercial entity.
Susanna

--
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages