New OAuth.php

[bpedro]

Hi,

There's a new version of OAuth.php available with the changes
described at http://groups.google.com/group/oauth/msg/0502f3682ac12c64

Please upgrade your local copies.

Thanks,

Bruno Pedro

[Will Norris]

have you looked at Marc Worrell's library[0]? That's what I'm current
planning on using for the DiSo OAuth plugin for WordPress.

[0]: http://code.google.com/p/oauth-php/

On Jan 15, 9:07 am, bpedro <bpe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There's a new version of OAuth.php available with the changes

> described athttp://groups.google.com/group/oauth/msg/0502f3682ac12c64

[Bruno Pedro]

Hi Will,

Other than the obvious code separation (different files, etc.), are there any big differences between that library and the "official" one?

I'm gonna take a deeper look at Marc Worrell's work.

Bruno Pedro

[Morten Fangel]

Hi Bruno

Having just spent 25.7 seconds (or something like that) it seems that 

the before mentioned library is more feature-complete than the 

"official" php library.

The "official" is however way more lightweight, so I feel that it's fair to

have both continued so developers can have a choice.. Do you want

the lightweight one you can easily see what does, and solves what

you need know, or do you want to this feature-stuffed library that 

contains way more LOC that you can wrap your head around..

So let's just get the basis of the "official" library bullet-proof with the

most essential features..

Or, thats my humble opinion anywaysss..

-fangel

[Morten Fangel]

Hi Bruno

Having just spent 25.7 seconds (or something like that) it seems that 

the before mentioned library is more feature-complete than the 

"official" php library.

The "official" is however way more lightweight, so I feel that it's fair to

have both continued so developers can have a choice.. Do you want

the lightweight one you can easily see what does, and solves what

you need know, or do you want to this feature-stuffed library that 

contains way more LOC that you can wrap your head around..

So let's just get the basis of the "official" library bullet-proof with the

most essential features..

Or, thats my humble opinion anywaysss..

-fangel

On Jan 17, 2009, at 6:34 PM, Bruno Pedro wrote:

[Bruno Pedro]

Actually, I was gonna suggest to do some merging between both libraries but, like I said before, I need some more time to look into Marc Worrell's work.

Bruno Pedro

[fangel]

Yes - I think the more modular approach of oauth-php is better than
the current
structure

PS. Sorry about the double posting, having some issues with Google
Groups and
two registered emails for the same account..

-fangel

On Jan 17, 11:34 pm, Bruno Pedro <bpe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Actually, I was gonna suggest to do some merging between both libraries but,
> like I said before, I need some more time to look into Marc Worrell's work.
>
> Bruno Pedro
>
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Morten Fangel <fan...@sevengoslings.net>wrote:
>
> > Hi Bruno
> > Having just spent 25.7 seconds (or something like that) it seems that
> > the before mentioned library is more feature-complete than the
> > "official" php library.
>
> > The "official" is however way more lightweight, so I feel that it's fair to
> > have both continued so developers can have a choice.. Do you want
> > the lightweight one you can easily see what does, and solves what
> > you need know, or do you want to this feature-stuffed library that
> > contains way more LOC that you can wrap your head around..
>
> > So let's just get the basis of the "official" library bullet-proof with the
> > most essential features..
>
> > Or, thats my humble opinion anywaysss..
>
> > -fangel
>
> > On Jan 17, 2009, at 6:34 PM, Bruno Pedro wrote:
>
> > Hi Will,
>
> > Other than the obvious code separation (different files, etc.), are there
> > any big differences between that library and the "official" one?
>
> > I'm gonna take a deeper look at Marc Worrell's work.
>
> > Bruno Pedro
>