I am new to Oakfoam go program and I have been evaluating the software in the past comparing it to fuego, pachi and gnugo on strength. In my own testing, I found that Oakfoam
lost to gnugo, fuego, in 5 games match. It even lost to fuego in 6 handicap advantage. Am i missing anything here? I expected Oakfoam go program to be a lot stronger
given it uses DCNN and feels similarity to fuego. on its engine features.
I have successfully compiled oakfoam version 0.2.1-dev(1.0). I have caffe enabled in compiling. However, my caffe version is CPU only so that I commented out some of
GPU device related codes as suggest in this group. Below is configuration file I used for the testing:
param thread_count 2
param cnn_num_of_gpus 1
param playouts_per_move 10000
param playouts_per_move_max 10000
param playouts_per_move_min 500
param uct_expand_after 20
The above is saved as file oakfoam.config, then when I run it, I run it like oakfoam -c oakfoam.config in command line.
The above configuration file idea came from some posts here mentioning the NG04 bot configuration. My hardware is duel core linux Ubuntu machine for the above testing environment.
Please correct me if I did wrong on above configurations.
Shoreline at DGS/KGS.