WG: Vocabulary for Search Results

26 views

Skip to first unread message

Neubert Joachim

unread,

Sep 20, 2010, 6:04:40 AM9/20/10

to oai...@googlegroups.com

Forwarding a conversation from publi...@w3.org, I'd like to add the question here if somebody from this list did already apply ORE to search result sets, and how this worked out.

Cheers, Joachim

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: public-lo...@w3.org [mailto:public-lo...@w3.org] Im Auftrag von Neubert Joachim
Gesendet: Montag, 20. September 2010 11:53
An: Bernhard Schandl; Linked Data community
Betreff: AW: Vocabulary for Search Results

Hi Bernhard,

at 20th Century Press Archives (http://zbw.eu/beta/p20) we plan to apply OAI-ORE to search results.

ORE (http://www.openarchives.org/ore/) covers in a pretty generic, LOD conform way *aggregations* of web resources (as non-information resources of its own), which are described by ressource maps (information resources), serialized as RDF/XML, RDFa or Atom.

Applying a special order to the result set (according to, say, a ranking algorithm) should be possible through ore:Proxy. Re. a paging mechanism for resource maps, which would be important for large result sets, there seem to be some early considerations (see http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1555400.1555503).

Hope this helps - Joachim

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: public-lo...@w3.org [mailto:public-lo...@w3.org] Im Auftrag von Bernhard Schandl
Gesendet: Montag, 20. September 2010 09:38
An: Linked Data community
Betreff: Vocabulary for Search Results

Hi,

I am looking for an RDF vocabulary to represent result lists of search requests. It should be able to represent an ordered list of result items, optionally with a score, where each result item points to a separate RDF resource. So far I didn't manage to find a suitable vocabulary, so I'd be grateful for any pointers.

If there is no such a vocabulary outside, I'd like to start developing one, if you like to participate please let me know.