Why We're Here | Introductions and Use Cases

[Christina Drummond]

Greetings from the American Midwest.

First of all, thank you for signing up for this discussion forum. Now that there are more than a few of us here, I wanted to kick off our first topic of conversation.

Let's start with introductions. This week, please take a few moments to: 

1. say hello and introduce yourself, and 

2. note why you or your organization is currently interested in OA monograph usage data. 

To ground this project in user-centered design, the OA eBU Data Trust team is seeking your help to describe the use cases and personas (roles) therein for organizations and staff members who might benefit from viewing OA eBook usage data. With these introductions, we’ll begin to understand who could use eBook usage information and for what purposes. These responses will also help us to get a clearer picture of the types of data, reports, exports, or tools that would be great to have. (If you have any "wish-list" items already in mind, please share.)

To propel the conversation forward, I share the following ideas generated from a 2018 workshop and shared in the “Exploring Open Access Ebook Usage” white paper authored by Brian O’Leary and Kevin Hawkins. 

>>>>>

Purposes include understanding and/or analyzing across data sources: 

Discovery

Access / Consumption / Engagement / Impact: 

• how / where OA monographs are being used

• relative performance of individual books and collections

• benchmarking and/or tracking of usage trends over time

• subject-specific patterns of use for OA monographs

• the communities engaging with OA monographs

Diversity

Quality

• data that informs the evaluation and communication of OA book/publishing value and performance

>>>>>

What do you think? Do these reflect the reasons you are here?

Are these the types of OA eBook usage insights that could matter to you or your organization or are there others?

Here are my answers to the above questions so that you can get to know me a bit...

Who am I: In addition to being the Program Officer for the OA eBook Usage (OAeBU) Data Trust effort, I'm a longtime data policy geek driven by impact and a deep love for the role of data visualizations in data-driven decision-making. After starting my career query and BI dashboard building to support B2B and nonprofit operations, I shifted into data policy, research development and program management. I focused on data analysis heavily in my social science training, prior to earning my MA in International Science and Technology Policy and I hold certifications in international business, design thinking, and information privacy. Aussi, je parle Francaise meilleur de j'écrit.

My interests in OA eBook Usage Data: While my role in this group is to facilitate discussion, I'm personally interested in how de-identified, aggregate usage data can facilitate ROI and gap analyses while surfacing trends in open knowledge flows.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

Christina

[Ronald Snijder]

Dear Christina,

Thanks for kicking off! 

And to answer your questions:

1. My name is Ronald Snijder. While I started from a library background, I quickly drifted into IT. In 2007 I started working at Amsterdam University Press, where a new project was being set up: OAPEN. Since then, I have been involved with the OAPEN Library, and later also the Directory of Open Access Books (DOAB). Nowadays I work fulltime at the OAPEN Foundation. I got rather fascinated by the question of how to prove the impact of open access on books, which resulted in a PhD (available here: https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/25287). 

2. The OAPEN Foundation is managing the OAPEN Library and the DOAB, two platforms dedicated to the dissemination of open access books and chapters. Understanding usage is vital to our mission.

Kind regards,

Ronald Snijder, PhD

 

OAPEN Foundation

Prins Willem-Alexanderhof 5

PO Box 90407

2509 LK The Hague

The Netherlands

 

email: r.sn...@oapen.org

www.oapen.org

 

ORCID: 0000-0001-9260-4941

[brussell]

Dear Christina

thanks for starting off the discussion. I'm sales director for HighWire, having moved across to the company after five years at Ingenta, where I headed up the Ingenta Connect aggregation platform and started Ingenta Open, which at the time was designed as a cost-effective home for OA-only publishers. Prior to that appointment I spent over 25 years in educational publishing, particularly in the field of learning management systems. As you will be aware, Highwire provides content delivery platforms, submissions systems, access and authentication gateways and - more importantly in the context of this group - an in-depth analytics tool which employs at-a-glance visualisation to determine impact and thereby guide editorial policies. .

We are constantly looking at ways of improving our range of products and services, but as with any new development in any sphere, a good business case must first be made to demonstrate, as far as possible, achievable ROI. It may be be that our current analytics tools can be adapted to focus attention on aggregated usage data, or that a completely new solution may need to be engineered. I'm here to learn what publishers may need, how those goals may realistically be achieved within budgetary constraints and whether Highwire should explore the building of appropriate toolkits to add to its portfolio.

I look forward to learning more in the coming months,

Byron

[Jennifer Kemp]

Dear all,

Like Ronald, I too have a library background (once a librarian, always a librarian though I always say), mainly in e-resources. I’ve spent more time in scholarly publishing though, mostly in marketing, product management and most recently, policy. For the past 4 years, I’ve been at Crossref where I am Head of Business Development, which means I work primarily with users of our metadata as well as service providers like hosting platforms that work with us on behalf of members. 

I thought my days of paying attention to usage might be behind me but Crossref has provided infrastructure support for something called Distributed Usage Logging (yes, DUL) which is a collaboration that includes, among others, COUNTER, of course. I also facilitate the Crossref Books Interest Group, which includes publishers, service providers and others and covers a range of Crossref and general industry topics. We were very fortunate to have Christina speak to the group today about the Data Trust! 

Hope everyone is staying well.

Best,

Jennifer

Jennifer Kemp
Head of Business Development | Crossref
Timezone: NY/Eastern U.S.

--
This message was generated through one of the OA eBook Usage Data Trust community forums. Learn more about this Andrew W. Mellon supported 2020-2022 pilot project at https://educopia.org/data_trust/.
---
To post to this group, email oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-platformsservices-group@ googlegroups.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OA eBU Data Trust Publishing Platforms/Services Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-pla...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-platformsservices-group/25552118-cf2c-4323-bb93-46f523f50c5co%40googlegroups.com.

[Charles Watkinson]

Thank you, Christina.

Who am I? I'm Charles Watkinson, Associate University Librarian for Publishing at University of Michigan and Director of University of Michigan Press. My main goal in life is to get the longest job title, but beyond that I am interested in monograph publishing and its future. University of Michigan Press is an integral part of U-M Library and publishes about 80 monographs a year. In 2016 we started working on our own publishing platform, now called Fulcrum, because it was becoming apparent that publishers need to innovate in form not only in content to compete. Recent moves by Cambridge UP to build Cambridge Core in-house and De Gruyter to build its own platform in collaboration with 67bricks show that other scholarly book publishers also see this. To sustain Fulcrum, we are offering hosting services at a low price point to aligned publishers. We recently launched British Archaeological Reports (3,000 titles) and the ACLS Humanities Ebook Collection (5,500 titles) on Fulcrum.

My interests in OA eBook Usage Data: Owning our own platform has the other advantage of being able to tell a rich story of usage to our authors, their funders, and our editors, and our funders. But with OA ebooks there is redeposit after redeposit on other platforms and the usage information gets split. For those platforms who do share usage information with us, they currently do so in such disparate ways that it is impossible to normalize the data. But so many other platforms don't share information with us. This makes it really hard to tell a data-driven story and, since usage is the currency of OA publishing, it makes it harder for us and our authors to justify an OA-forward approach.

Charles

--

This message was generated through one of the OA eBook Usage Data Trust community forums. Learn more about this Andrew W. Mellon supported 2020-2022 pilot project at https://educopia.org/data_trust/.
---
To post to this group, email oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-platformsservices-group@ googlegroups.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OA eBU Data Trust Publishing Platforms/Services Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-pla...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-platformsservices-group/25552118-cf2c-4323-bb93-46f523f50c5co%40googlegroups.com.

--

Charles Watkinson

Director, University of Michigan Press

Associate University Librarian, Publishing

University of Michigan Library

839 Greene Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48104-3209

(office) 734 936 0452, (mobile) 609 933 2410

wat...@umich.edu

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9453-6695

My pronouns are he / him / his

Learn more about how Michigan Publishing is making an impact and advancing the mission of our parent institution at https://www.publishing.umich.edu/ 

[Christina Drummond]

Greetings all:

Now that there are almost 30 of us in this group, I wanted to encourage everyone to take a moment to introduce yourself and your particular interest in OA eBook usage data. 

• How is your platform or service interacting with eBook usage data? 
• Which role(s) at your organization use OA eBook usage metrics (and for what types of applications / purpose)?  
• Is the data incorporated into a specific workflow, report, or decision process? 

I am going to be working behind the scenes to pull together what comes across this list to present it back next week for holistic review. 

If you're uncomfortable sharing this information publicly, please know that next week I hope to share a link to a virtual board that will let you add information about your particular use-case anonymously.  

I look forward to learning about how each of you are interacting with OA eBook usage data!

Warm regards, 

Christina

[Kelly B. Swickard]

Hell all,

 

I am Kelly; I work at Project MUSE, which is part of Johns Hopkins University Press.  I am the Metadata and Linked Data Strategist; my background is 10+ years of academic librarianship as a cataloger/metadata librarian. I am not directly involved with Open Access usage statistics. I know that we collect them and share them across departments for various functions. MUSE has COUNTER for the library customers. Publishers who work with MUSE can sign into the platform and collect statistics.

 

Thank you,
Kelly

 

Kelly B. Swickard, MA, MLIS

Metadata & Linked Data Strategist

Project MUSE

The Johns Hopkins University Press

2715 N. Charles Street

Baltimore, MD 21218

Email: K...@press.jhu.edu

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3197-2932

 

Pronouns: she/her/hers

 

From: oa-ebu-data-trust-publishi...@googlegroups.com <oa-ebu-data-trust-publishi...@googlegroups.com> On Behalf Of Christina Drummond
Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2020 2:00 PM
To: OA eBU Data Trust Publishing Platforms/Services Group <oa-ebu-data-trust-publishi...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [OAeBU-DataTrust-PlatformsServices] Why We're Here | Introductions and Use Cases

 

Greetings all:

 

Now that there are almost 30 of us in this group, I wanted to encourage everyone to take a moment to introduce yourself and your particular interest in OA eBook usage data. 

• How is your platform or service interacting with eBook usage data? 
• Which role(s) at your organization use OA eBook usage metrics (and for what types of applications / purpose)?  
• Is the data incorporated into a specific workflow, report, or decision process? 

I am going to be working behind the scenes to pull together what comes across this list to present it back next week for holistic review. 

 

If you're uncomfortable sharing this information publicly, please know that next week I hope to share a link to a virtual board that will let you add information about your particular use-case anonymously.  

I look forward to learning about how each of you are interacting with OA eBook usage data!

 

Warm regards, 

 

Christina

On Saturday, June 27, 2020 at 9:06:21 AM UTC-4 watkinc wrote:

Thank you, Christina.

 

Who am I? I'm Charles Watkinson, Associate University Librarian for Publishing at University of Michigan and Director of University of Michigan Press. My main goal in life is to get the longest job title, but beyond that I am interested in monograph publishing and its future. University of Michigan Press is an integral part of U-M Library and publishes about 80 monographs a year. In 2016 we started working on our own publishing platform, now called Fulcrum, because it was becoming apparent that publishers need to innovate in form not only in content to compete. Recent moves by Cambridge UP to build Cambridge Core in-house and De Gruyter to build its own platform in collaboration with 67bricks show that other scholarly book publishers also see this. To sustain Fulcrum, we are offering hosting services at a low price point to aligned publishers. We recently launched British Archaeological Reports (3,000 titles) and the ACLS Humanities Ebook Collection (5,500 titles) on Fulcrum.

 

My interests in OA eBook Usage Data: Owning our own platform has the other advantage of being able to tell a rich story of usage to our authors, their funders, and our editors, and our funders. But with OA ebooks there is redeposit after redeposit on other platforms and the usage information gets split. For those platforms who do share usage information with us, they currently do so in such disparate ways that it is impossible to normalize the data. But so many other platforms don't share information with us. This makes it really hard to tell a data-driven story and, since usage is the currency of OA publishing, it makes it harder for us and our authors to justify an OA-forward approach.

 

Charles

 

On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 4:31 PM Christina Drummond <chri...@educopia.org> wrote:

Greetings from the American Midwest.

 

First of all, thank you for signing up for this discussion forum. Now that there are more than a few of us here, I wanted to kick off our first topic of conversation.

 

Let's start with introductions. This week, please take a few moments to: 

1.    say hello and introduce yourself, and 

2.    note why you or your organization is currently interested in OA monograph usage data. 

--
This message was generated through one of the OA eBook Usage Data Trust community forums. Learn more about this Andrew W. Mellon supported 2020-2021 pilot project at https://educopia.org/data_trust/ .

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OA eBU Data Trust Publishing Platforms/Services Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-pla...@googlegroups.com.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-platformsservices-group/1058f63d-4d8a-4028-9374-57f66637cc53n%40googlegroups.com.

[Ronald Snijder]

Dear all,

 

For the OAPEN Library, usage data is an important indicator of our success. Our mission is to disseminate OA books, and having reliable data is crucial. Since mid-2013, we cooperate with IRUS-UK in order to obtain COUNTER compliant usage data (book and chapter downloads). See also https://irus.jisc.ac.uk/documents/IRUS-UK_working_with_OAPEN.pdf.

 

We send reports to our members (publishers and funders) about the usage of ‘their’ documents. Furthermore, we make usage and other ‘altmetrics’ visible for publications with a DOI. See for instance https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/30339.

 

Kind regards,

Ronald Snijder, PhD

 

OAPEN Foundation

Prins Willem-Alexanderhof 5

PO Box 90407

2509 LK The Hague

The Netherlands

 

email: r.sn...@oapen.org

www.oapen.org

 

ORCID: 0000-0001-9260-4941

 

Van: oa-ebu-data-trust-publishi...@googlegroups.com <oa-ebu-data-trust-publishi...@googlegroups.com> Namens Christina Drummond
Verzonden: donderdag 9 juli 2020 20:00
Aan: OA eBU Data Trust Publishing Platforms/Services Group <oa-ebu-data-trust-publishi...@googlegroups.com>
Onderwerp: Re: [OAeBU-DataTrust-PlatformsServices] Why We're Here | Introductions and Use Cases

 

Greetings all:

 

Now that there are almost 30 of us in this group, I wanted to encourage everyone to take a moment to introduce yourself and your particular interest in OA eBook usage data. 

• How is your platform or service interacting with eBook usage data? 
• Which role(s) at your organization use OA eBook usage metrics (and for what types of applications / purpose)?  
• Is the data incorporated into a specific workflow, report, or decision process? 

I am going to be working behind the scenes to pull together what comes across this list to present it back next week for holistic review. 

 

If you're uncomfortable sharing this information publicly, please know that next week I hope to share a link to a virtual board that will let you add information about your particular use-case anonymously.  

I look forward to learning about how each of you are interacting with OA eBook usage data!

 

Warm regards, 

 

Christina

On Saturday, June 27, 2020 at 9:06:21 AM UTC-4 watkinc wrote:

Thank you, Christina.

 

Who am I? I'm Charles Watkinson, Associate University Librarian for Publishing at University of Michigan and Director of University of Michigan Press. My main goal in life is to get the longest job title, but beyond that I am interested in monograph publishing and its future. University of Michigan Press is an integral part of U-M Library and publishes about 80 monographs a year. In 2016 we started working on our own publishing platform, now called Fulcrum, because it was becoming apparent that publishers need to innovate in form not only in content to compete. Recent moves by Cambridge UP to build Cambridge Core in-house and De Gruyter to build its own platform in collaboration with 67bricks show that other scholarly book publishers also see this. To sustain Fulcrum, we are offering hosting services at a low price point to aligned publishers. We recently launched British Archaeological Reports (3,000 titles) and the ACLS Humanities Ebook Collection (5,500 titles) on Fulcrum.

 

My interests in OA eBook Usage Data: Owning our own platform has the other advantage of being able to tell a rich story of usage to our authors, their funders, and our editors, and our funders. But with OA ebooks there is redeposit after redeposit on other platforms and the usage information gets split. For those platforms who do share usage information with us, they currently do so in such disparate ways that it is impossible to normalize the data. But so many other platforms don't share information with us. This makes it really hard to tell a data-driven story and, since usage is the currency of OA publishing, it makes it harder for us and our authors to justify an OA-forward approach.

 

Charles

 

On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 4:31 PM Christina Drummond <chri...@educopia.org> wrote:

Greetings from the American Midwest.

 

First of all, thank you for signing up for this discussion forum. Now that there are more than a few of us here, I wanted to kick off our first topic of conversation.

 

Let's start with introductions. This week, please take a few moments to: 

1.     say hello and introduce yourself, and 

2.     note why you or your organization is currently interested in OA monograph usage data. 

--

This message was generated through one of the OA eBook Usage Data Trust community forums. Learn more about this Andrew W. Mellon supported 2020-2021 pilot project at https://educopia.org/data_trust/ .

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OA eBU Data Trust Publishing Platforms/Services Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-pla...@googlegroups.com.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-platformsservices-group/1058f63d-4d8a-4028-9374-57f66637cc53n%40googlegroups.com.

[Christina Drummond]

FYI, from Martyn Rittman at Crossref: 

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Martyn Rittman <mrit...@crossref.org>

Hello Christina,

My introduction:

I'm working as Product Manager at Crossref. One of my responsibilities is for Event Data, where we monitor events around the internet for any books or chapters that have a DOI registered with Crossref.

Thanks and best regards,
Martyn

This message was generated through one of the OA eBook Usage Data Trust community forums. Learn more about this Andrew W. Mellon supported 2020-2021 pilot project at https://educopia.org/data_trust/ .

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OA eBU Data Trust Publishing Platforms/Services Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-pla...@googlegroups.com.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-platformsservices-group/1058f63d-4d8a-4028-9374-57f66637cc53n%40googlegroups.com.

[Russell, Bonnie]

Hello everyone!

 

I’m Bonnie. I am now the Project Manager for MESH Research at Michigan State University, but previously I was the Technical Project Manager at the Wayne State University Press. Like Kelly I’m no longer directly involved in OA ebook usage metrics, however one of the projects I’m involved with may begin doing so.

 

On a personal note, in finishing my MLIS in April I began work on a research proposal that specifically looks at OA ebook usage data, and I am working to continue that research at MSU. I’m particularly interested in OA usage in regards to open educational resources.

 

I’m very much looking forward to working with all of you.

 

Best,

 

Bonnie

 

Bonnie Russell

She/Her/Hers

Project Manager MESH Research

College of Arts and Letters | MSU Libraries

Michigan State University

1. say hello and introduce yourself, and 

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-platformsservices-group/B42BAE0B0EB4404FA33BDF3734CF0ECE01F7D222B3%40EXDAG1.press.jhu.edu.

[Cristina.Mezuk]

Greetings!

My name is Cristina Mezuk, and I am the Books Licensing Editor at JSTOR. I've worked for JSTOR for the last 10 years on both the Content Management/Production side and now on the Content Development/Licensing side. I was one of the internal staff members who helped build out the metadata requirements for open access books on JSTOR, and worked with technical teams to get that completed. I've worked with KU, SHMP, TOME, and various other grant funded initiatives to get their content on JSTOR, or in some cases collaborate with other platforms to send them OA metadata/files.

From a research platform point of view, we use OA usage data to point to potential areas for development plans (such as by looking at discipline information) and also learn about users we are not aware of by simply looking at gated-content usage. As a platform for publishers, this is important for us to share with them, too, so they are aware of content creation opportunities and/or other hidden customer bases around the world they might not know about.

Cheers,

Cristina Mezuk

[cvandyck]

Hello, all. I am Craig Van Dyck, Executive Director of the CLOCKSS Archive. I have just joined this group. Digital Preservation might seem a bit tangential to the group's focus, but in principle I believe that Preservation is in-scope here, albeit maybe near the boundary. Preservation is, after all, meant to ensure long-term availability for usage. CLOCKSS preserves 200,000 books and growing. We preserve 25,000 journal titles, and provide Open Access to 64 journals because they were "triggered" due to the publisher ceasing to make them available. We have not yet triggered a book. Many of the journals and books that we preserve are made Open Access by their publishers. When we trigger content for access, we always do so OA. I look forward to contributing to this project. Thank you!

[Sebastian Nordhoff]

Hello,
my name is Sebastian Nordhoff. I am the director of Language Science
Press. Language Science Press has been publishing OA books in
linguistics since 2014, at a current rate of 30 a year.

Our content is available on our own OMP platform, on OAPEN, DOAB, Zenodo
and the university repository of the Freie Universität Berlin. The
lion's share of our books are downloaded from our own platform. We
extract usage data from the web server logs.

We disclose our download data per book and per month as csv:
https://github.com/langsci/opendata/blob/master/bookdownloads/langscidownloads.csv

Some insights and analyses of these figures are shared here:
https://userblogs.fu-berlin.de/langsci-press/category/statistics/

Our main use case is to give some feedback to authors how their books
are performing.

My current, somewhat tentative, position is that usage data can only be
meaningfully compared within the same platform. So if book A has more
downloads than book B on OMP, that tells me something. OTOH, if book A
has more downloads on OAPEN than book B on Zenodo, it will be difficult
to draw any meaningful conclusions from that.

Best wishes
Sebastian

> Hello everyone!____
>
> __ __

>
> I’m Bonnie. I am now the Project Manager for MESH Research at
> Michigan State University, but previously I was the Technical
> Project Manager at the Wayne State University Press. Like Kelly
> I’m no longer directly involved in OA ebook usage metrics,
> however one of the projects I’m involved with may begin doing

> so.____
>
> __ __

>
> On a personal note, in finishing my MLIS in April I began work
> on a research proposal that specifically looks at OA ebook usage
> data, and I am working to continue that research at MSU. I’m
> particularly interested in OA usage in regards to open

> educational resources. ____
>
> __ __
>
> I’m very much looking forward to working with all of you.____
>
> __ __
>
> Best,____
>
> __ __
>
> Bonnie____
>
> __ __
>
> Bonnie Russell____
>
> She/Her/Hers____
>
> Project Manager MESH Research <http://www.meshresearch.net/>____
>
> College of Arts and Letters <https://www.cal.msu.edu/> | MSU
> Libraries <https://lib.msu.edu/>____
>
> Michigan State University <https://msu.edu/>____
>
> __ __
>
> *From:*oa-ebu-data-trust-publishi...@googlegroups.com
> <oa-ebu-data-trust-publishi...@googlegroups.com> *On Behalf Of
> *Kelly B. Swickard
> *Sent:* Saturday, July 11, 2020 7:56 PM
> *To:* oa-ebu-data-trust-publishi...@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* RE: [OAeBU-DataTrust-PlatformsServices] Why We're
> Here | Introductions and Use Cases____
>
> __ __
>
> Hell all, ____
>
> __ __

>
> I am Kelly; I work at Project MUSE, which is part of Johns
> Hopkins University Press.  I am the Metadata and Linked Data
> Strategist; my background is 10+ years of academic librarianship
> as a cataloger/metadata librarian. I am not directly involved
> with Open Access usage statistics. I know that we collect them
> and share them across departments for various functions. MUSE
> has COUNTER for the library customers. Publishers who work with

> MUSE can sign into the platform and collect statistics. ____
>
> __ __
>
> Thank you,
> Kelly____
>
> __ __
>
> Kelly B. Swickard, MA, MLIS____
>
> Metadata & Linked Data Strategist____
>
> Project MUSE____
>
> The Johns Hopkins University Press____
>
> 2715 N. Charles Street____
>
> Baltimore, MD 21218____
>
> Email:K...@press.jhu.edu____
>
> iD iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3197-2932
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/orcid.org/0000-0002-3197-2932__;!!HXCxUKc!l8Qq1TpJe3zhLG7M0mwSWpUP_RbPV-cAbshYa8l5FUuK0pmCZ66lKQdLJkkAKg$>____
>
> __ __
>
> Pronouns: she/her/hers____
>
> __ __
>
> *From:*oa-ebu-data-trust-publishi...@googlegroups.com
> <oa-ebu-data-trust-publishi...@googlegroups.com> *On Behalf Of
> *Christina Drummond
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 9, 2020 2:00 PM
> *To:* OA eBU Data Trust Publishing Platforms/Services Group
> <oa-ebu-data-trust-publishi...@googlegroups.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [OAeBU-DataTrust-PlatformsServices] Why We're
> Here | Introductions and Use Cases____
>
> __ __
>
> Greetings all:____
>
> __ __

>
> Now that there are almost 30 of us in this group, I wanted to
> encourage everyone to take a moment to introduce yourself and

> your particular interest in OA eBook usage data. ____
>
> * How is your platform or service interacting with eBook usage
> data? ____
> * Which role(s) at your organization use OA eBook usage
> metrics (and for what types of applications / purpose)? ____
> * Is the data incorporated into a specific workflow, report,
> or decision process? ____

>
> I am going to be working behind the scenes to pull together what
> comes across this list to present it back next week for holistic

> review. ____
>
> __ __

>
> If you're uncomfortable sharing this information publicly,
> please know that next week I hope to share a link to a virtual
> board that will let you add information about your particular

> use-case anonymously. ____

>
> I look forward to learning about how each of you are interacting

> with OA eBook usage data!____
>
> __ __
>
> Warm regards, ____
>
> __ __
>
> Christina____
>
> On Saturday, June 27, 2020 at 9:06:21 AM UTC-4 watkinc wrote:____
>
> Thank you, Christina.____
>
> __ __

>
> Who am I? I'm Charles Watkinson, Associate University
> Librarian for Publishing at University of Michigan and
> Director of University of Michigan Press. My main goal in
> life is to get the longest job title, but beyond that I am
> interested in monograph publishing and its future.
> University of Michigan Press is an integral part of U-M
> Library and publishes about 80 monographs a year. In 2016 we
> started working on our own publishing platform, now called
> Fulcrum, because it was becoming apparent that publishers
> need to innovate in form not only in content to compete.
> Recent moves by Cambridge UP to build Cambridge Core
> in-house and De Gruyter to build its own platform in
> collaboration with 67bricks show that other scholarly book
> publishers also see this. To sustain Fulcrum, we are
> offering hosting services at a low price point to aligned
> publishers. We recently launched British Archaeological
> Reports (3,000 titles) and the ACLS Humanities Ebook

> Collection (5,500 titles) on Fulcrum.____
>
> __ __

>
> My interests in OA eBook Usage Data: Owning our own platform
> has the other advantage of being able to tell a rich story
> of usage to our authors, their funders, and our editors, and
> our funders. But with OA ebooks there is redeposit after
> redeposit on other platforms and the usage information gets
> split. For those platforms who do share usage information
> with us, they currently do so in such disparate ways that it
> is impossible to normalize the data. But so many other
> platforms don't share information with us. This makes it
> really hard to tell a data-driven story and, since usage is
> the currency of OA publishing, it makes it harder for us and

> our authors to justify an OA-forward approach.____
>
> __ __
>
> Charles____
>
> __ __

>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 4:31 PM Christina Drummond

> <chri...@educopia.org> wrote:____
>
> Greetings from the American Midwest. ____
>
> __ __

>
> First of all, thank you for signing up for this
> discussion forum. Now that there are more than a few of
> us here, I wanted to kick off our first topic of

> conversation.____
>
> __ __
>
> *Let's start with introductions. This week, please take
> a few moments to: *____
>
> 1. say hello and introduce yourself, and ____
>
> 1. note why you or your organization is currently
> interested in OA monograph usage data. ____
>
> __ __

>
> To ground this project in user-centered design, the OA
> eBU Data Trust team is seeking your help to describe the
> use cases and personas (roles) therein for organizations
> and staff members who might benefit from viewing OA
> eBook usage data. With these introductions, we’ll begin
> to understand who could use eBook usage information and
> for what purposes. These responses will also help us to
> get a clearer picture of the types of data, reports,
> exports, or tools that would be great to have. (If you
> have any "wish-list" items already in mind, please

> share.)____
>
> __ __

>
> To propel the conversation forward, I share the
> following ideas generated from a 2018 workshop and
> shared in the “Exploring Open Access Ebook Usage

> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/hcommons.org/deposits/item/hc:24147__;!!HXCxUKc!l8Qq1TpJe3zhLG7M0mwSWpUP_RbPV-cAbshYa8l5FUuK0pmCZ66lKQdA31T_4g$>”

> white paper authored by Brian O’Leary and Kevin Hawkins.

> ____
>
> >>>>>__ __
>
> Purposes include understanding and/or analyzing/across
> data sources/: ____
>
> /Discovery/____
>
> /Access / Consumption / Engagement / Impact: /____
>
> * /how / where OA monographs are being used____/
> * /relative performance of individual books and
> collections____/
> * /benchmarking and/or tracking of usage trends over
> time____/
> * /subject-specific patterns of use for OA monographs____/
> * /the communities engaging with OA monographs____/
>
> __ __
>
> /Diversity/____
>
> /Quality/____
>
> * /data that informs the evaluation and communication
> of OA book/publishing value and performance____/
>
> >>>>>__ __
>
>
> *What do you think? Do these reflect the reasons you are
> here? *____
>
> *Are these the types of OA eBook usage insights that

> could matter to you or your organization or are there

> others?*____
>
> __ __
>
> _Here are my answers to the above questions so that you
> can get to know me a bit..._____

>
> Who am I: In addition to being the Program Officer for
> the OA eBook Usage (OAeBU) Data Trust effort, I'm a
> longtime data policy geek driven by impact and a deep
> love for the role of data visualizations in data-driven
> decision-making. After starting my career query and BI
> dashboard building to support B2B and nonprofit
> operations, I shifted into data policy, research
> development and program management. I focused on data
> analysis heavily in my social science training, prior to
> earning my MA in International Science and Technology
> Policy and I hold certifications in international
> business, design thinking, and information privacy.

> Aussi, je parle Francaise meilleur de j'écrit.____
>
> __ __

>
> My interests in OA eBook Usage Data: While my role in
> this group is to facilitate discussion, I'm personally
> interested in how de-identified, aggregate usage data
> can facilitate ROI and gap analyses while surfacing

> trends in open knowledge flows. ____
>
> __ __
>
> I look forward to hearing from you.____
>
> __ __
>
> Sincerely,____
>
> Christina____
>
> -- ____

>
> This message was generated through one of the OA eBook
> Usage Data Trust community forums. Learn more about this
> Andrew W. Mellon supported 2020-2022 pilot project at
> https://educopia.org/data_trust/

> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/educopia.org/data_trust/__;!!HXCxUKc!l8Qq1TpJe3zhLG7M0mwSWpUP_RbPV-cAbshYa8l5FUuK0pmCZ66lKQc-KGP1UQ$>.

> ---
> To post to this group, email
> oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-platformsservices-group@
> googlegroups.com

> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/googlegroups.com__;!!HXCxUKc!l8Qq1TpJe3zhLG7M0mwSWpUP_RbPV-cAbshYa8l5FUuK0pmCZ66lKQcrPUTGtw$>

> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to
> the Google Groups "OA eBU Data Trust Publishing
> Platforms/Services Group" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
> from it, send an email to
> oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-pla...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-platformsservices-group/25552118-cf2c-4323-bb93-46f523f50c5co%40googlegroups.com

> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/groups.google.com/d/msgid/oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-platformsservices-group/25552118-cf2c-4323-bb93-46f523f50c5co*40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer__;JQ!!HXCxUKc!l8Qq1TpJe3zhLG7M0mwSWpUP_RbPV-cAbshYa8l5FUuK0pmCZ66lKQc2x9VA-A$>.____
>
>
> ____
>
> __ __
>
> -- ____
>
> __ __
>
> Charles Watkinson____
>
> Director, University of Michigan Press____
>
> Associate University Librarian, Publishing____
>
> University of Michigan Library____
>
> 839 Greene Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48104-3209____
>
> (office) 734 936 0452 <tel:(734)%20936-0452>, (mobile) 609
> 933 2410 <tel:(609)%20933-2410>____
>
> wat...@umich.edu____
>
> https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9453-6695
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/orcid.org/0000-0002-9453-6695__;!!HXCxUKc!l8Qq1TpJe3zhLG7M0mwSWpUP_RbPV-cAbshYa8l5FUuK0pmCZ66lKQdgeNpxpA$>____
>
> /My pronouns are he / him / his/____
>
> __ __

>
> Learn more about how Michigan Publishing is making an impact
> and advancing the mission of our parent institution at
> https://www.publishing.umich.edu/

> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.publishing.umich.edu/__;!!HXCxUKc!l8Qq1TpJe3zhLG7M0mwSWpUP_RbPV-cAbshYa8l5FUuK0pmCZ66lKQelSXvIPA$>
> ____

>
> --
> This message was generated through one of the OA eBook Usage
> Data Trust community forums. Learn more about this Andrew W.
> Mellon supported 2020-2021 pilot project at
> https://educopia.org/data_trust/

> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/educopia.org/data_trust/__;!!HXCxUKc!l8Qq1TpJe3zhLG7M0mwSWpUP_RbPV-cAbshYa8l5FUuK0pmCZ66lKQc-KGP1UQ$>

> .
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> Google Groups "OA eBU Data Trust Publishing Platforms/Services
> Group" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
> it, send an email to
> oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-pla...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-platformsservices-group/1058f63d-4d8a-4028-9374-57f66637cc53n%40googlegroups.com

> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/groups.google.com/d/msgid/oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-platformsservices-group/1058f63d-4d8a-4028-9374-57f66637cc53n*40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer__;JQ!!HXCxUKc!l8Qq1TpJe3zhLG7M0mwSWpUP_RbPV-cAbshYa8l5FUuK0pmCZ66lKQfHC3JaAA$>.____

>
> --
> This message was generated through one of the OA eBook Usage
> Data Trust community forums. Learn more about this Andrew W.
> Mellon supported 2020-2021 pilot project at
> https://educopia.org/data_trust/

> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/educopia.org/data_trust/__;!!HXCxUKc!l8Qq1TpJe3zhLG7M0mwSWpUP_RbPV-cAbshYa8l5FUuK0pmCZ66lKQc-KGP1UQ$>

> .
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> Google Groups "OA eBU Data Trust Publishing Platforms/Services
> Group" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
> it, send an email to
> oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-pla...@googlegroups.com.
>
> To view this discussion on the web visit

> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-platformsservices-group/B42BAE0B0EB4404FA33BDF3734CF0ECE01F7D222B3%40EXDAG1.press.jhu.edu
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/groups.google.com/d/msgid/oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-platformsservices-group/B42BAE0B0EB4404FA33BDF3734CF0ECE01F7D222B3*40EXDAG1.press.jhu.edu?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer__;JQ!!HXCxUKc!l8Qq1TpJe3zhLG7M0mwSWpUP_RbPV-cAbshYa8l5FUuK0pmCZ66lKQerCkiBUw$>.____

>
> --
> This message was generated through one of the OA eBook Usage Data Trust
> community forums. Learn more about this Andrew W. Mellon supported
> 2020-2021 pilot project at https://educopia.org/data_trust/ .
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "OA eBU Data Trust Publishing Platforms/Services Group" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to
> oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-pla...@googlegroups.com

> <mailto:oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-pla...@googlegroups.com>.

> To view this discussion on the web visit

> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-platformsservices-group/ee9812b9-5ddc-4b04-b869-6cd097b6d526n%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-platformsservices-group/ee9812b9-5ddc-4b04-b869-6cd097b6d526n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
Dr. Sebastian Nordhoff
Geschäftsführer

LangSci Press gUG (haftungsbeschränkt)
Bänschstraße 29, 10247 Berlin

Geschäftsführer Dr. Sebastian Nordhoff
Amtsgericht Berlin-Charlottenburg
Handelsregister HRB 188251 B

[Lorraine Estelle]

Dear Sebastian

Nice to meet you. I agree that usage statistics about a platform are useful, but many OA books are widely distributed across many platforms. Understanding the aggregate usage across platforms is also important. For the publisher and author of course, but also for the funders of the book. For example, libraries contributing to initiatives such as Knowledge Unlatched, are interested in the total usage of the books they to which they have contributed funding.

Comparing usage across platforms could also be useful in highlighting possible resource discovery issues.

Kind regards
Lorraine

> oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-platformsservices-group+unsubscribe@googl
> oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-platformsservices-group+egroups.com

> <mailto:oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-pla...@googlegroups.com>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-platfor
> msservices-group/ee9812b9-5ddc-4b04-b869-6cd097b6d526n%40googlegroups.
> com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-platformsservices-group/ee9812b9-5ddc-4b04-b869-6cd097b6d526n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
Dr. Sebastian Nordhoff
Geschäftsführer

LangSci Press gUG (haftungsbeschränkt)
Bänschstraße 29, 10247 Berlin

Geschäftsführer Dr. Sebastian Nordhoff
Amtsgericht Berlin-Charlottenburg
Handelsregister HRB 188251 B

--
This message was generated through one of the OA eBook Usage Data Trust community forums. Learn more about this Andrew W. Mellon supported 2020-2021 pilot project at https://educopia.org/data_trust/ .
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OA eBU Data Trust Publishing Platforms/Services Group" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-pla...@googlegroups.com.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-platformsservices-group/ad471850-3590-b257-5eaa-d25a7c4201e1%40langsci-press.org.

[Cameron Neylon]

I’d add to this that you can’t directly compare usage numbers across platforms and get a sensible result (without a lot of upstream work on standardising those numbers) but what we can aspire to is to understand enough about what usage looks like on different platforms (and how it is being measured) to be able to compare usage.

What I mean is that we should be careful about naively comparing numbers, but we can think through approaches that give us a sense of how usage is playing out on different platforms. We should also get away from imagining that those usage numbers tell us very much directly. They need interpretation and analysis and standardisation even if we’re not comparing them. 

As an example I’d agree we can’t tell much from the raw usage numbers for OAPEN vs Zenodo. But if we have a baseline of usage on each platform for a specific book and there is some kind of intervention we can probably tell how much that intervention affected usage on each platform and compare that. A question for further down the track is whether we could use baselines obtained from other books or whether that is not reliable, but that is a research question for the future! And with standards like COUNTER we are working towards enhancing comparability across platforms.

Cheers

Cameron

Cameron Neylon

Professor of Research Communications

Centre for Culture and Technology

School of Media, Creative Arts and Social Inquiry

Curtin University

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-platformsservices-group/a98af067528b4ebe8c11f851474e832d%40counterusage.org.

[Sebastian Nordhoff]

On 10/6/20 3:22 PM, Cameron Neylon wrote:
> I’d add to this that you can’t directly compare /usage numbers/ across

> platforms and get a sensible result (without a lot of upstream work on
> standardising those numbers) but what we can aspire to is to understand
> enough about what usage looks like on different platforms (and how it is

> being measured) to be able to compare /usage/.

>
> What I mean is that we should be careful about naively comparing
> numbers, but we can think through approaches that give us a sense of how
> usage is playing out on different platforms. We should also get away
> from imagining that those usage numbers tell us very much directly. They
> need interpretation and analysis and standardisation even if we’re not
> comparing them.
>
> As an example I’d agree we can’t tell much from the raw usage numbers
> for OAPEN vs Zenodo. But if we have a baseline of usage on each platform
> for a specific book and there is some kind of intervention we can
> probably tell how much that intervention affected usage on each platform
> and compare that.

Dear all,
to prevent any misunderstandings, I am very much in favour of usage
data. And I am very much in alignment with everything Cameron writes here.
Best wishes
Sebastian

> A question for further down the track is whether we
> could use baselines obtained from other books or whether that is not
> reliable, but that is a research question for the future! And with
> standards like COUNTER we are working towards enhancing

> /comparability/ across platforms.

> oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-pla...@googlegroups.com

> <mailto:oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-pla...@googlegroups.com>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit

> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-platformsservices-group/857fca68-19bf-4173-b5be-7bbf96d7e96c%40Spark
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-platformsservices-group/857fca68-19bf-4173-b5be-7bbf96d7e96c%40Spark?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

[Roxanne Missingham]

Thanks for the discussion.

From my perspective what we look at in particular is trends rather than absolute numbers. There will always be different system and methodological issues - for example the move from COUNTER4 to COUNTER5 has generally meant there is a decrease in reported usage - however we have chosen to interpret that as a change in method so we are not comparing before and after, but taking the new number as a starting point from which to measure trends.

There are major differences as well between how others report usage - ProQuest for example reports pages rather than articles.

So it is a bumpy road with a need to understand different metrics and take our institutional perspective (for example ours is really about increasing reach - geographic and overall engagement through downloads) and doing the best we can to interpret the numbers that are available to us.

I think hat for me the great value in this project is that we can discuss the strategic and institutional goals as well as the goals of authors (information for promotions and other purposes) as well as publishers to understand the board landscape. And taking the information into a repository that will provide informative rich reports is astoundingly good and important.

Regards

Roxanne

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-platformsservices-group/2e771327-d091-2b1e-7843-8f61fee9c155%40langsci-press.org.

[Lorraine Estelle]

Dear Roxanne

Just two points here about 'a decrease in usage', which I hope may be helpful, although I realize may be too much information for others!!

Content providers deliver books in different ways. In Release 4 of the Code of Practice, this difference was dealt with in two separate reports:
BR1 for entire books delivered as a single PDF
BR2 for books delivered in chapters
This presented librarians with the problems of comparing usage across platforms and (for BR2) calculating cost per use at the title level.

To address this Release 5 introduced two new metrics: Unique_Item_Requests and Unique_Title_Requests.
The Numbers of Unique_Item_Requests may vary between publisher platform, based on whether the content is delivered as a complete book or by chapter, but the Unique_Title_Requests will be the same regardless of delivery mechanism.
For platforms that deliver books as a single PDF, comparison between R4 and R5 can be done using R4 Requests (BR1) and R5 Unique_Title_Requests AND Data_Type=Book
For platforms that deliver books as chapters, comparison between R4 and R5 can be done using R4 Requests (BR2) and Total_Item_Requests AND Data_Type=Chapter.
This method should provide a clearer picture of the trend across the releases.

The other point to note is that COVID-19 has had a big impact on usage statistics this year (certainly for journals). This is because some publishers and vendors have put a lot of content outside their paywalls in response to the pandemic. At the same time students and researchers have been working from home, and very often not authenticating to access library resources. As a result, several journal publishers have told me that they can only attribute about 20% of usage to institutions even though overall usage has increased. I don't know if the impact has been the same for book usage, but it is likely that some of the same is happening this year.

>>> ormsservices-group/B42BAE0B0EB4404FA33BDF3734CF0ECE01F7D222B3%40EXDA
>>> G1.press.jhu.edu
>>>
>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/groups.google.com/d/msgid/oa-ebu
>>> -d
>>> ata-trust-publishing-platformsservices-group/B42BAE0B0EB4404FA33BDF3
>>> 73
>>> 4CF0ECE01F7D222B3*40EXDAG1.press.jhu.edu?utm_medium=email&utm_source
>>> =f
>>> ooter__;JQ!!HXCxUKc!l8Qq1TpJe3zhLG7M0mwSWpUP_RbPV-cAbshYa8l5FUuK0pmC

>>> Z6
>>> 6lKQerCkiBUw$>.____
>>>
>>> --
>>> This message was generated through one of the OA eBook Usage Data
>>> Trust community forums. Learn more about this Andrew W. Mellon
>>> supported
>>> 2020-2021 pilot project at https://educopia.org/data_trust/ .
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "OA eBU Data Trust Publishing Platforms/Services Group" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>> send an email to
>>> oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-platformsservices-group+unsubscribe@goo

>>> oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-platformsservices-group+gl

> msservices-group/857fca68-19bf-4173-b5be-7bbf96d7e96c%40Spark
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-platformsservices-group/857fca68-19bf-4173-b5be-7bbf96d7e96c%40Spark?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
Dr. Sebastian Nordhoff
Geschäftsführer

LangSci Press gUG (haftungsbeschränkt)
Bänschstraße 29, 10247 Berlin

Geschäftsführer Dr. Sebastian Nordhoff
Amtsgericht Berlin-Charlottenburg
Handelsregister HRB 188251 B

--
This message was generated through one of the OA eBook Usage Data Trust community forums. Learn more about this Andrew W. Mellon supported 2020-2021 pilot project at https://educopia.org/data_trust/ .
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OA eBU Data Trust Publishing Platforms/Services Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-pla...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-platformsservices-group/2e771327-d091-2b1e-7843-8f61fee9c155%40langsci-press.org.

--
This message was generated through one of the OA eBook Usage Data Trust community forums. Learn more about this Andrew W. Mellon supported 2020-2021 pilot project at https://educopia.org/data_trust/ .
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OA eBU Data Trust Publishing Platforms/Services Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-pla...@googlegroups.com.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-platformsservices-group/SYYP282MB1069F5B1F0543E909A3A148AAF0D0%40SYYP282MB1069.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM.

[Roxanne Missingham]

thanks

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/oa-ebu-data-trust-publishing-platformsservices-group/53b0ba335fcc49d29730b1c8fcc85212%40counterusage.org.