Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

lawyers Ernie Gartrell and Geoff Fulton

166 views
Skip to first unread message

Richard Hector

unread,
Feb 27, 2001, 9:14:08 PM2/27/01
to
"E. Scrooge" wrote:
>
> Tough luck, Dopey.
> That doesn't give you any right to post the private home details of these
> people.

And which you just reposted. Learn to snip.

Richard

E. Scrooge

unread,
Feb 27, 2001, 11:02:11 PM2/27/01
to

Richard Hector <rhe...@actrix.gen.nz> wrote in article
<3A9C5EF0...@actrix.gen.nz>...

It was already there. It was a bit late to close the barn door after the
horse had already bolted.
However, I probably should've, for all the difference that it would've
made.

E. Scrooge

E. Scrooge

unread,
Feb 28, 2001, 1:41:00 AM2/28/01
to

Col <cfra...@ihug.co.nz> wrote in article
<05ecOuH7TwT7nD...@4ax.com>...
> "E. Scrooge" <e.sc...@zfree.co.nx (z replaces x)> wrote:
>
> >
> >Peter Zohrab <zoh...@i4free.co.nz> wrote in article
> ><3a9b...@news.attica.net.nz>...
> >> Anyone who has been helped by myself or by MERA (NZ Men for Equal
Rights
> >> Association) Inc., or who supports me and/or our aims, please note the
> >> details of the following lawyers in the Wellington, NZ, area:
> >>
>> >> I may give further details later, but for now I will just say that I
have
> >> been subjected to abuse of my human rights and went to these two
lawyers
> >for
> >> help on separate issues, but was mucked about. If lawyers do not do
> >their
> >> job ethically, then there is no rule of Law.
> >>
> >> Peter Zohrab

> >
> >Tough luck, Dopey.
> >That doesn't give you any right to post the private home details of
these
> >people. What a sick mind you have. What about the rights of these MEN
> >(lawyers)? Don't you think that they deserve any, you damn hypocrite?
> >Still though, if you help to turn some people away from these MALE
lawyers,
> >it could only help some of the FEMALE lawyers that are out there. Well
> >done lad, keep up the good work.
> >More than likely you never had a case that needed to be answered.
Though
> >you could try using a FEMALE lawyer.
> >
> >It's obvious to anyone that sees your post, that the only rights that
> >you're worried about are your own (selfish prick). You didn't give a
stuff
> >about the rights of these people, when you posted their private details
> >into the news groups.
> >
> Scroogie. If those detail were available in the public domain ( Telephone
books,
> Yellow pages etc ) then they can be posted here. I don't agree with him
doing it
> though.
>
> --
> Col

That's right, Col. I've thought about that one. While these addresses are
freely available, one has to actually look them up to find them, before
they can get to see them.
What this bugger has done, is like opening up the phone book, and shoving
it under peoples noses while saying, "Here's the private address and
details of a lawyer that's no damn good" (or words to that fashion). He's
making the information a lot easier than it was already. A bit like if he
was to leave his front door unlocked tonight, to help give any burglers
easier access to his house.
While knowing these lawyers names, not many here would then bother to look
up the details that "Zippy" has provided. He could also start putting up
posters of this information around his town, or try putting these details
into his local newspaper as well, it would be much the same thing.

E. Scrooge

enkidu

unread,
Feb 28, 2001, 2:08:52 AM2/28/01
to
Col wrote:
>
> >> I may give further details later, but for now I will just
> >> say that I have been subjected to abuse of my human rights
> >> and went to these two lawyers for help on separate issues,
> >> but was mucked about. If lawyers do not do their job
> >> ethically, then there is no rule of Law.
>
> Scroogie. If those detail were available in the public
> domain ( Telephone books, Yellow pages etc ) then they can
> be posted here. I don't agree with him doing it though.
>
He should not have qaccused them of being unethical in an
open forum.

I hope that someone was watching!

Cheers,

Cliff

E. Scrooge

unread,
Feb 28, 2001, 2:19:46 AM2/28/01
to

enkidu <enk...@cliffp.com> wrote in article
<3A9CA404...@cliffp.com>...

There just might be someone that's involved in the legal profession, that
just may pass it onto the people concerned.

E. Scrooge

Big Brother

unread,
Feb 28, 2001, 2:27:56 AM2/28/01
to

E. Scrooge <e.sc...@zfree.co.nx (z replaces x)> wrote in message
news:01c0a156$b5c7bf40$96eeadcb@oemcomputer...

> There just might be someone that's involved in the legal profession, that
> just may pass it onto the people concerned.
>
> E. Scrooge

Yes, both lawyers have been informed.

jfwilson

unread,
Feb 28, 2001, 3:25:58 AM2/28/01
to

Big Brother <who...@blah.nz> wrote in message
news:97i938$ue8$1...@lust.ihug.co.nz...

Is'nt all publicity, good publicity? There may very well
be clients that approve of the lawyer's attitude. :)

Kerry

unread,
Feb 28, 2001, 4:50:02 AM2/28/01
to
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001 22:49:18 +1300, David Farrar <da...@farrar.com>
wrote:

>On Wed, 28 Feb 2001 07:36:08 +1300, "Peter Zohrab"
><zoh...@i4free.co.nz> wrote:
>
>>Anyone who has been helped by myself or by MERA (NZ Men for Equal Rights
>>Association) Inc., or who supports me and/or our aims, please note the
>>details of the following lawyers in the Wellington, NZ, area:
>>

>>1) Ernie Gartrell
>>a) Work:
>
>A lovely guy and excellent lawyer. I recommend him to anyone who is
>not mad.
>

Hahahahahaha

****************************************************
"Janice the day you are elected as a spokesperson for
"thinking NZ"is the day the brain drain ends because
we've run out."

DPF
****************************************************

E. Scrooge

unread,
Feb 28, 2001, 5:20:09 AM2/28/01
to

David Farrar <da...@farrar.com> wrote in article
<7cip9tcn1no9du78t...@4ax.com>...

> On Wed, 28 Feb 2001 07:36:08 +1300, "Peter Zohrab"
> <zoh...@i4free.co.nz> wrote:
>
> >Anyone who has been helped by myself or by MERA (NZ Men for Equal Rights
> >Association) Inc., or who supports me and/or our aims, please note the
> >details of the following lawyers in the Wellington, NZ, area:
> >
> >1) Ernie Gartrell
> >a) Work:
>
> A lovely guy and excellent lawyer. I recommend him to anyone who is
> not mad.
>
> DPF

Looks like he might be busy for a day or so.

E. Scrooge

Final Justice

unread,
Feb 28, 2001, 1:28:43 PM2/28/01
to

"jfwilson" <jfwi...@paradise.net.nz> wrote in message
news:97icp6$25id$1...@raewyn.paradise.net.nz...

Exactly. Someone who is looking for a tiger of a lawyer, guaranteed to go
after her ex's jugular vein, may very well be plunking down her retainer fee
in the near future, based on that post.


Diane

0 new messages