On Sun, 11 Feb 2024, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <l...@nz.invalid> wrote:
>How would English sound if you restricted yourself to words that came only
>from its original Germanic roots?
Well of course the language evolves to encompass new technology &
science, so if you take away all those new words, then you'll have
trouble. Also few people appreciate how much English & French were
engineered in the 18th & 19th centuries by language leaders whose
top-down changes were delivered onwards by the schools.
>Quite a fun read. What’s he talking about here?
>
> At first it was thought that the uncleft was a hard thing that
> could be split no further; hence the name.
uncleft = atom
> Now we know it is made up of lesser motes.
motes = particles
> There is a heavy *kernel*
NUCLEUS
> with a forward bernstonish lading,
POSITIVE CHARGE
> and around it one or more light motes with backward ladings.
PARTICLES WITH NEGATIVE CHARGE
(The irony is "positive" and "negative" should have been the other way
around -- the "negative" delivers and the "positive" receives. But
the early researchers had a 50-50 guess as to which way it went -- and
guessed wrong.
> The least uncleft is that of ordinary waterstuff.
THE SMALLEST ATOM IS HYDROGEN
> Its kernel is a lone forwardladen mote called a *firstbit*.
ITS NUCLEUS IS A LONE POSITIVE-CHARGED PROTON
> Outside it is a backwardladen mote called a *bernstonebit*.
AROUND IS A NEGATIVE-CHARGED ELECTRON
> The firstbit has a heaviness about 1840-fold that of the bernstonebit.
THE PROTON HAS 1840x THE MASS OF THE ELECTRON
> Early worldken folk thought bernstonebits
> swing around the kernel like the earth around the sun, but now we
> understand they are more like waves or clouds.
EARLY THOUGHT WAS THAT THE ELECTRONS ORBITED THE NUCLEUS, BUT NOW WE
KNOW THEY ARE CLOSED-VIBRATION SYSTEMS.
Thanks for the diversion.