More Ardern garbage.

[Tony]

https://www.bassettbrashandhide.com/post/barry-brill-an-absurd-ardern-ambition
And we have to fix this crap - what a terrible person she is.

[Rich80105]

On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 20:45:10 GMT, Tony <lizan...@orcon.net.nz>
wrote:

>https://www.bassettbrashandhide.com/post/barry-brill-an-absurd-ardern-ambition
>And we have to fix this crap - what a terrible person she is.

I agree it is crap, Tony, and Barry Brill is male - you are getting
confused.

[Tony]

Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 20:45:10 GMT, Tony <lizan...@orcon.net.nz>
>wrote:
>
>>https://www.bassettbrashandhide.com/post/barry-brill-an-absurd-ardern-ambition
>>And we have to fix this crap - what a terrible person she is.
>

>I agree I am crap, Tony, and Barry Brill is male - you are getting
>confused.
Ardern is, apparently, female - not that I care. Rich is obviously some sort of
gender that is yet to be defined.
I was not referring to Brill you moron.

[Rich80105]

On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 23:51:36 GMT, Tony <lizan...@orcon.net.nz>
wrote:

>Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 20:45:10 GMT, Tony <lizan...@orcon.net.nz>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>https://www.bassettbrashandhide.com/post/barry-brill-an-absurd-ardern-ambition
>>>And we have to fix this crap - what a terrible person she is.
>>
>>I agree I am crap, Tony, and Barry Brill is male - you are getting
>>confused.

Changing a previous post is appalling behaviour - as those that have
any sense at all can see that my post said:
"I agree it is crap, Tony, and Barry Brill is male - you are getting
confused."

If you had meant that the article was not crap you should have been
clearer - posting a url and saying we must fix this crap clearly
indicated that you regarded the material at that url to be crap - all
I did was agree, and point out that the author is male. .

>Ardern is, apparently, female - not that I care. Rich is obviously some sort of
>gender that is yet to be defined.
>I was not referring to Brill you moron.

Your posting inadequacies are all your own, Tony - abusing others
posters is off bad enough, but misrepresenting the posts of others by
changing words is appalling behaviour regardless of your other
deficiencies. .

[Tony]

Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 23:51:36 GMT, Tony <lizan...@orcon.net.nz>
>wrote:
>
>>Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 20:45:10 GMT, Tony <lizan...@orcon.net.nz>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>https://www.bassettbrashandhide.com/post/barry-brill-an-absurd-ardern-ambition
>>>>And we have to fix this crap - what a terrible person she is.
>>>
>>>I agree I am crap, Tony, and Barry Brill is male - you are getting
>>>confused.
>Changing a previous post is appalling behaviour

Not at all - your deliberate changing what I and others post by going off
deliberately off topic is much worse.

> - as those that have
>any sense at all can see that my post said:
>"I agree I am crap, Tony, and Barry Brill is male - you are getting
>confused."
>

>If you had meant that the article was not crap you should have been
>clearer - posting a url and saying we must fix this crap clearly
>indicated that you regarded the material at that url to be crap - all
>I did was agree, and point out that the author is male. .

No - you deliberately twisted what I wrote that is truly appalling. but not new.

>
>>Ardern is, apparently, female - not that I care. Rich is obviously some sort
>>of
>>gender that is yet to be defined.
>>I was not referring to Brill you moron.
>

Abuse gone for now.

[Lawrence D'Oliveiro]

She’s long gone from political power, yet a powerful woman still scares
the shit out of you, doesn’t she?

[Tony]

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <l...@nz.invalid> wrote:
>She’s long gone from political power, yet a powerful woman still scares
>the shit out of you, doesn’t she?

No, she never has. I have worked for a much smarter woman than Ardern who had a
few other attributes Ardern lacks. My boss was not just intelligent but had
integrity, she didn't need to lie and she was not afraid to meet people who
disagreed with her. None of thos attributes exist in Ardern (or you
apparantly). Now, about integrity, how is your faux Hamilton business doing?

[Rich80105]

On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 02:14:22 GMT, Tony <lizan...@orcon.net.nz>

Readers of nz.general should take note that Tony more than once
changed the record of previous posts by another poster to
substantially change the meaning, and also often deletes posts that he
disagrees with.

[Rich80105]

On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 06:02:17 GMT, Tony <lizan...@orcon.net.nz>
wrote:

[Tony]

Rich - they know what you are and what you deserve so you can forget your
infantile holier-than-thou garbage. You are a lying, abusive, coward. Period.

[Tony]

[Rich80105]

On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 08:05:44 GMT, Tony <lizan...@orcon.net.nz>
wrote:

[Tony]

Rich - they know what you are and what you deserve so you can forget your
infantile holier-than-thou garbage. You are a lying, abusive, coward.

[Aristotle_the_3rd]

New here but have watched for a while.
The poster *Tony* has got you exactly where he (I assume it is a he)
wants you, every time he tells you to jump you ask how high. Why don't
you show some courage and kill file him. That would take more character
than you have got. The problem is, it won't stop him answering you, and
that would really upset you. Or you could pretend to do it and sneakily
read what he sends.
But imagine not being able to answer because you have pretended to kill
file him. What will you do.
Go on really kill file him and never answer him again, that would be nice.

[Rich80105]

On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 10:08:51 +1300, Aristotle_the_3rd
<aris...@wisegreeks.com> wrote:
<deleted>
Welcome Aristotle.

You are correct that there are few new posters to nz.general - other
"social media" are more the focus for most New Zealanders these days.
Anonymity can be useful at times, but sadly is so often used to
indulge in offensive behaviour. I have followed nz.general from around
the time it started, with a few breaks, I suspect it will take us by
surprise when it eventually stops.

Do post again.

Rich80105

[Lawrence D'Oliveiro]

On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 06:02:17 GMT, Tony wrote:

> Lawrence D'Oliveiro <l...@nz.invalid> wrote:
>
>>She’s long gone from political power, yet a powerful woman still scares
>>the shit out of you, doesn’t she?
>
> No, she never has.

And yet you are still obsessing over her. If she is so ineffectual, why
waste your time?

[Tony]

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <l...@nz.invalid> wrote:
>On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 06:02:17 GMT, Tony wrote:
>
>> Lawrence D'Oliveiro <l...@nz.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>She’s long gone from political power, yet a powerful woman still scares
>>>the shit out of you, doesn’t she?
>>
>> No, she never has.
>
>And yet you are still obsessing over her. If she is so ineffectual, why
>waste your time?

Mentioning someone is not obsession - those comprehension lessons for you
appear to becoming more urgent. I simply loathe her dishonesty and deliberate
destruction of a country.
You have zero ability to determine what is a waste or otherwise of my time.

[Aristotle_the_3rd]

Kind of you to welcome me, funny really because I have been watching a
while.
I see you deleted most of what I wrote but you also don't like people
deleting your words. Why is it different for you? I have seen stuff from
you that is rude as well.

[Tony]

You just met the group troll. I suggest that you ignore him, butter turns
rancid whenever he is with a foot of some.
Others here will be pleasant and will debate without his lies and nastiness.

[Rich80105]

I started a new Subject, but left the reference to the other thread so
that the reason for the welcome could be identified. As a new thread
it really is a new discussion however.

I delete words far less often than others, but I do object when
deleting previous posts is used for avoidance of discussion. In the
days of dial-up modems it was done to keep band-width low, but those
days are long past. My concern in a recent thread was having my words
changed to the reverse of what I had actually said - that is
effectively libel or defamation, which I believe we should all take
seriously. In an anonymous group it is hardly worth trying to track
the cowardly defamer, but that does not excuse Tony for his dishonesty
and offensive post - yes I will respond rudely to some posts.

If you had only been watching we could not have welcomed you earlier,
but if you are now surprised, have you also posted under another name?
Feel free to start a post if there is a topic you believe could do
with discussion . . .

[Aristotle_the_3rd]

On 18/02/2024 4:45 pm, Rich80105 wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 14:47:47 +1300, Aristotle_the_3rd
> <aris...@wisegreeks.com> wrote:
>
>> On 18/02/2024 11:32 am, Rich80105 wrote:
>>> On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 10:08:51 +1300, Aristotle_the_3rd
>>> <aris...@wisegreeks.com> wrote:
>>> <deleted>
>>> Welcome Aristotle.
>>>
>>> You are correct that there are few new posters to nz.general - other
>>> "social media" are more the focus for most New Zealanders these days.
>>> Anonymity can be useful at times, but sadly is so often used to
>>> indulge in offensive behaviour. I have followed nz.general from around
>>> the time it started, with a few breaks, I suspect it will take us by
>>> surprise when it eventually stops.
>>>
>>> Do post again.
>>>
>>> Rich80105
>>>
>> Kind of you to welcome me, funny really because I have been watching a
>> while.
>> I see you deleted most of what I wrote but you also don't like people
>> deleting your words. Why is it different for you? I have seen stuff from
>> you that is rude as well.
>
> I started a new Subject, but left the reference to the other thread so
> that the reason for the welcome could be identified. As a new thread
> it really is a new discussion however.

Not really - you did just what you have said that others did.

>
> I delete words far less often than others, but I do object when
> deleting previous posts is used for avoidance of discussion. In the
> days of dial-up modems it was done to keep band-width low, but those
> days are long past. My concern in a recent thread was having my words
> changed to the reverse of what I had actually said - that is
> effectively libel or defamation, which I believe we should all take
> seriously. In an anonymous group it is hardly worth trying to track
> the cowardly defamer, but that does not excuse Tony for his dishonesty
> and offensive post - yes I will respond rudely to some posts.

To lots of posts, more often than most other posters. i say it as I see
it and I think there are lots here that agree. The poster you mean only
picks on you - why is that. got to be a reason.

>
> If you had only been watching we could not have welcomed you earlier,
> but if you are now surprised, have you also posted under another name?
> Feel free to start a post if there is a topic you believe could do
> with discussion . . .

May be not, I think you will be bad news and i just wanted to be
friendly, why are you never like that.
>
>
>
>
>
>

[Tony]

It is truly amazing how genuinely nasty people like Rich, can justify their
behaviour by putting the blame on those they defame and abuse.
Rich is one such.
I am convinced he is a sociopath, he can not relate to other people although he
will fake that in his personal life - true sociopathic behaviour is living a
lie.
He displays all the major symptoms.
He accuses me of defamation, the definition of which he clearly does not
understand, he on the other hand has defamed me and many others - some of those
people his betters by any definition.
He thinks he owns this newsgroup but the reverse is the truth - it owns him.
He is not very bright but he is cunning, all sociopaths are.
The sad thing is he actually believes he is not the guilty one and he always
will unless he gets treatment which is often unsucessful.

[Tony]

Sorry "unsuccessful", I don't use a spell checker and I type very fast -
sometimes I miss a typo.

[Aristotle_the_3rd]

Hell me too. Sometimes people get annoyed with bad spelling by other
people. Sometimes they complain just to be nasty.

[Tony]

Indeed yes.