I can't recall if I've brought up this issue before but I certainly think it warrants discussion:
There are quantifiable rules governing all aspects of the game -- the size of the ball, the weight of the ball, the size of the table and its height, and the height of the net; but, what's not quantifiable is the tension the net is supposed to possess. The rules only convey that the net is supposed to be 'tight', but that isn't a measurable characteristic, unlike everything else:
Here is what is said about the net:
2.2 THE NET ASSEMBLY
2.2.1 The net assembly shall consist of the net, its suspension and the supporting
posts, including the clamps attaching them to the table.
2.2.2 The net shall be suspended by a cord [emphasis mine ] attached at each end to an upright
post 15.25cm high, the outside limits of the post being 15.25cm outside the sideline.
2.2.3 The top of the net, along its whole length, shall be 15.25cm above the
playing surface.
2.2.4 The bottom of the net, along its whole length, shall be as close as possible
to the playing surface and the ends of the net shall be attached to the supporting posts from top to bottom.
This is intriguing. Nothing in the rules denotes the tensility that the net ought to possess. Indeed, the measurements of the ball are made clear, the length and height of the table, but net tensility isn't afforded a quantifiable measurement; I think it should.
The assumption is that the net should be made taut, but over time, as the net ages, regardless of how tight one might make the net, it loses tensility; it wears out. The ball inevitably makes contact with the net and there is often no way of knowing how it will affect the trajectory. Maybe if there is a gauge engineered to measure how tight the net is, then that would make play more predictable. Also, if we could measure net tensility we could objectively know when it is time to invest in a new net.
Marcus Allison