Nigger Jokes
Jim Haaver
> Anyone know any good nigger jokes. No coons need apply. Here is some of my
> selection.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> What do you call three dead niggers in the back of a
> landrover?
>
> A: A good days hunting
>
>
> Whats the difference between a nigger and a pot hole?
>
> A: You would swerve to go around a pot hole
>
>
> Whats long, brown and smells?
>
> A: The Welfare queue in harlem.
>
>
> What do you call 1000 dead niggers at the bottom of
> the sea?
>
> A: A good start
>
>
> What do you call two dead niggers with no arms or
> legs in a boat?
>
> A: The drifters
>
>
> Nigger kid is watching his mother. He says "Wen you
> be finished, Can iz be licking de bowl out" She says
> no flush the fucking thing like everyone else
>
>
> Did you hear about the nigger who got sent to court for
> fucking a cat? The judge dismissed the case because he
> never heard of a nigger putting anything into a kitty
>
>
> Man walkes into a shop in harlem. Says to the nigress
> behind the counter 'can I smell your fanny'. certaintly
> not she replies. 'Oh it must be the drains then'
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> More jokes later.
Keep 'em coming!
Jim
Serene
Serene
Since I'm already a member of the Southern Poverty Law Center (make
monthly donations of a set amount) and also work with them in using
their Teaching Tolerance Packages at schools around here, and because my
husband recently got a great job and I can do this now...
Every time one of you cross posting trolls posts a racist joke, or a
racist tirade, or a link to something that that horrible man Pierce
said, I am going to add an extra $10 per month to my contribution to
Morris Dees S.P.L.C. Anything racist or bigoted gets Dees, who I know
you all hate, an extra $10 a month. That could really add up for me, so
I hope you just quit posting to ok.general
Now, if you'll excuse me, I've got bacon frying.
Serene
Jack Tyler
Serene <sere...@home.comehomelassie> wrote in message
news:3B5C25B0...@home.comehomelassie...
> Get off ok.general!!
And houston.general.
Che'Gu Maru
all by yourselves.
Since you seem to hate the United States of America so much, with its belief
that all citizens should be equal under the law regardless of ancestry, why
don't you leave and found your own little piece of white supremacist heaven
up around the North Pole? There, at least, everything you'd see would be
white.
"Jim Haaver" <jha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:b642e958.01072...@posting.google.com...
> Keep 'em coming!
>
> Jim
Billy Boy
Che'Gu Maru <chgu...@hal-pc.org> wrote in message
news:9jhgas$o5o$1...@news.hal-pc.org...
> If you racist bigoted slimeball pigs weren't so pathetic, you'd be a joke
> all by yourselves.
>
> Since you seem to hate the United States of America so much, with its
belief
> that all citizens should be equal under the law regardless of ancestry,
why
> don't you leave and found your own little piece of white supremacist
heaven
> up around the North Pole? There, at least, everything you'd see would be
> white.
>
Right on!! There is one country established on an old oil rig and since the
gulf is full of dead oil rigs the white racists could use them as island
countries. They could have there own money with pictures of KKK leaders. Not
sure what they could do for industry and trade although George W. would
probably help them out. Any ideas?
Ironwood
> This is America and people have the right to tell racist jokes.
"This" is not America. This is the Internet.
Ironwood
> ->> This is America and people have the right to tell racist jokes.
> ->
> On The Date Of Mon, 23 Jul 2001 16:05:13 GMT, "Ironwood" <Iron...@use.net>
Wrote The
> Followng:
> ->"This" is not America. This is the Internet.
> ->> Ok, John G. Censorship III
Bit defensive, are you?
Serene
> Why not give him $100K right now and let me read some of these funny jokes?
>
> This is America and people have the right to tell racist jokes.
>
> If you don't like my driving then get off the sidewalk!
> http://member.iquest.net/~derecho/pika.
Are you a regular in ok.general that I don't know about? How about just
not cross-posting them in here?
Serene
Ironwood
> ->> ->> This is America and people have the right to tell racist jokes.
> ->> ->> ->Wrote The
> ->> Followng:
> ->> ->"This" is not America. This is the Internet.
> ->> ->> ->> Ok, John G. Censorship III
> ->
> On The Date Of Mon, 23 Jul 2001 16:58:39 GMT, "Ironwood" <Iron...@use.net>
Wrote The
> Followng:
> ->Bit defensive, are you?> Not me. But those of you who jump at every chance to call someone a racist are
the
> ones being defensive.
>
> Racism is when you do something that directly prevents someone else from
having
> either a freedom or right that YOU have. Telling jokes is just that, jokes.
>
> People need to get the big chip off their shoulder.
>
> If a black man in the ghetto complains about racist humor for 20 years he will
still
> be in that ghetto. So the question should be asked: Why not do things to
improve your
> life and leave the moaning to wimmin??
Why not work on your reading comprehension? I didn't call anyone racist, or
mention censorship. I merely corrected your asinine statement about this being
America. For the record, though, I don't think your "jokes" are appropriate
either.
JETman
j-...@brokersys.com wrote:
>
>
>
> Only when they're funny. Retreaded <moron, Aggie, whatever> jokes aren't
> particularly funny.
Now wait a minnit pal..... These heeya parts revolve around Aggie jokes!
--
Regards,
JT (Residing in Austin, Texas)
Just Tooling Down The Internet Superhighway With my G4.......
Ironwood
> On The Date Of Mon, 23 Jul 2001 19:03:44 GMT, "Ironwood" <Iron...@use.net>
Wrote The
> Followng:
> ->Why not work on your reading comprehension? I didn't call anyone racist, or
> ->mention censorship. I merely corrected your asinine statement about this
being
> ->America. For the record, though, I don't think your "jokes" are appropriate
> ->either.
> ->
"David Nathan Cole" <dnc...@yahoo.com> wrote...
> Hey you god damn moron, I DIDN'T POST ANY JOKES!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> DO YOU READ THREADS???????????????????????????
>
> LEARN TO FOLLOW A THREAD!
Oddly enough, I never said that you did. However, you defended them. Maybe I'm
not the one who needs to learn to read.
By the way, you might want to calm down. You're beginning to look foolish.
Adam Weiss
>
> On The Date Of Mon, 23 Jul 2001 16:58:39 GMT, "Ironwood" <Iron...@use.net> Wrote The
> Followng:
>
> ->> ->"David Nathan Cole" <dnc...@yahoo.com> wrote...
> ->> ->> This is America and people have the right to tell racist jokes.
> ->> ->
> ->> Followng:
> ->> ->> ->> Ok, John G. Censorship III
> ->
> ->Bit defensive, are you?
> ->
>
> Not me. But those of you who jump at every chance to call someone a racist are the
> ones being defensive.
>
> Racism is when you do something that directly prevents someone else from having
> either a freedom or right that YOU have. Telling jokes is just that, jokes.
>
> People need to get the big chip off their shoulder.
>
> If a black man in the ghetto complains about racist humor for 20 years he will still
> be in that ghetto. So the question should be asked: Why not do things to improve your
> life and leave the moaning to wimmin??
>
> If you don't like my driving then get off the sidewalk!
On the same token, if a white man spends 20 years doing nothing but
thinking up racist jokes, he'll never be any better than where he
started. So the question should be asked: why not do things to improve
your life and give up the jokes? They aren't funny anyway unless you're
drunk and living in Idaho.
--
Adam Weiss
w...@whazo.com
--
"It's all fun and games until someone pokes an eye out, or until you see
the blue lights in the mirror"
--
a...@whatever.com
crap !!! this will be my only responce to yet another bigot !
Anita
Knowledge is power...support is essential.
Mapi
mapi
"Serene" <sere...@home.comehomelassie> wrote in message
news:3B5C57E7...@home.comehomelassie...
Mapi
liberal agenda and facism in disguise.
These yoyos are the nanny motherfuckers who want to control your life, your
thoughts and your speech. These assholes are the people who want busing,
welfare, more taxes and more socialism.
What they would really like to do with the internet is censor it all and to
make sure only their idea of free speech is allowed.
They want all your guns taken away from you and for more laws to keep you in
check.
Resist these do-gooding socialist liberals at every step.
Mapi
"Serene" <sere...@home.comehomelassie> wrote in message
news:3B5C290C...@home.comehomelassie...
Mapi
If you hate the racists so much.....
"why
> don't you leave and found your own little piece of intolerant facist
heaven
> up around the North Pole? There, at least, everything you'd see would
be".... just like you
mapi
"Che'Gu Maru" <chgu...@hal-pc.org> wrote in message
news:9jhgas$o5o$1...@news.hal-pc.org...
Mapi
"Ironwood" <Iron...@use.net> wrote in message
news:ZWX67.35170$k33.3...@typhoon.kc.rr.com...
> "David Nathan Cole" <dnc...@yahoo.com> wrote...
> > This is America and people have the right to tell racist jokes.
>
> "This" is not America. This is the Internet.
>
>
>
Which means you have the right to tell even more and grosser racist jokes
anytime you feel like it.
Ain't true democracy a bitch?
" ...but *you* can't handle it!"
mapi
Serene
>
> Southern Poverty Law center is a communist/socialist/liberal front for the
> liberal agenda and facism in disguise.
>
> These yoyos are the nanny motherfuckers who want to control your life, your
> thoughts and your speech. These assholes are the people who want busing,
> welfare, more taxes and more socialism.
>
> What they would really like to do with the internet is censor it all and to
> make sure only their idea of free speech is allowed.
> They want all your guns taken away from you and for more laws to keep you in
> check.
>
> Resist these do-gooding socialist liberals at every step.
>
> Mapi
I knew that would get to a few of you. And their record on the 1st
ammendment ain't great, but I don't care. I've got my ACLU card for
that. What they do they do well, and I'll take a liberal facist who
doesn't hate any day over a uneducated, socially deprived, small minded
bigot. I'm doing what I said I'd do. (Up to a point. I can't pay too
much every month, but I'll stretch it a little. I'm sick of feeling
helpless toward all the idiotic, racist ranting I read on here. I have
to do something proactive.)
Serene
Ironwood
> Southern Poverty Law center is a communist/socialist/liberal front for the
> liberal agenda and facism in disguise.
>
> These yoyos are the nanny motherfuckers who want to control your life, your
> thoughts and your speech. These assholes are the people who want busing,
> welfare, more taxes and more socialism.
But I'll bet they don't spend much time calling you names.
> What they would really like to do with the internet is censor it all and to
> make sure only their idea of free speech is allowed.
> They want all your guns taken away from you and for more laws to keep you in
> check.
All my guns, really? No big deal. I can count them on zero fingers.
Ironwood
> > > This is America and people have the right to tell racist jokes.
> > >
> > Are you a regular in ok.general that I don't know about? How about just
> > not cross-posting them in here?
> > Serene
"Mapi" <Ma...@austin.rr.com> wrote...
> How about you shut the hell up you facist liberal socialist nanny idiot?
How about you learn some manners?
Cass
Would you mind posting your address so that the resident kick-burglars that
are reading this will know that you don't have any guns and would like to
pay you a visit.
Cass
"Ironwood" <Iron...@use.net> wrote in message
news:TEn77.46750$k33.4...@typhoon.kc.rr.com...
Steve Wertz
>
> Ironwood,
>
> Would you mind posting your address so that the resident kick-burglars that
> are reading this will know that you don't have any guns and would like to
> pay you a visit.
What a whimp you are.
86% of residents in the midwest don't own deadly firearms, and even if they
did, they couldn't use them properly when the time came. They'd shit
their pants, more likely.
-sw (Chinese Stars - Use Them)
Ironwood
> > > They want all your guns taken away from you and for more laws to keep
> > > you in check.
> >
> > All my guns, really? No big deal. I can count them on zero fingers.
> >
> Would you mind posting your address so that the resident kick-burglars that
> are reading this will know that you don't have any guns and would like to
> pay you a visit.
Friends of yours?
Mapi
"Serene" <sere...@home.comehomelassie> wrote in message
news:3B5DF5B5...@home.comehomelassie...
Mapi
"Ironwood" <Iron...@use.net> wrote in message
news:TEn77.46750$k33.4...@typhoon.kc.rr.com...
> "Mapi" <Ma...@austin.rr.com> wrote...
> > What they would really like to do with the internet is censor it all and
to
> > make sure only their idea of free speech is allowed.
> > They want all your guns taken away from you and for more laws to keep
you in
> > check.
>
> All my guns, really? No big deal. I can count them on zero fingers.
>
>
>
Really? Where do you live?
Do you have lots of valuables?
Can I come over and visit with you?
Got any nubile daughters and a nice looking wife and a nice new car?
Do you daughters know your stand on non-violence and gun ownership and do
they have their own plans when daddy is on his sucking the home invader's
dicks in a vain attempt to keep them from killing him?
Why don't you just walk around with a big sign on your back " I have lots of
money and refuse to defend myself. I trust you."?
mapi
Ironwood
> > > What they would really like to do with the internet is censor it all and
> > > to make sure only their idea of free speech is allowed.
> > > They want all your guns taken away from you and for more laws to keep
> > > you in check.
> >
> > All my guns, really? No big deal. I can count them on zero fingers.
> >
> Really? Where do you live?
> Do you have lots of valuables?
> Can I come over and visit with you?
> Got any nubile daughters and a nice looking wife and a nice new car?
> Do you daughters know your stand on non-violence and gun ownership and do
> they have their own plans when daddy is on his sucking the home invader's
> dicks in a vain attempt to keep them from killing him?
>
> Why don't you just walk around with a big sign on your back " I have lots of
> money and refuse to defend myself. I trust you."?
Of course you would see it that way. Did I say anything about my "stand on
non-violence and gun ownership"? No, I did not. Did I say "I refuse to defend
myself" or that "I trust you"? No, of course not. Break into my house and see
what you get.
Typical knee-jerk reaction. Don't you know that jumping to foolish conclusions
can get you killed?
Steve Wertz
> Really? Where do you live?
> Do you have lots of valuables?
> Can I come over and visit with you?
> Got any nubile daughters and a nice looking wife and a nice new car?
> Do you daughters know your stand on non-violence and gun ownership and do
> they have their own plans when daddy is on his sucking the home invader's
> dicks in a vain attempt to keep them from killing him?
Mapi watched 'Fear' last night. The Teeny-Bopper one, not the serious one.
-sw
Serene
>
> So, when is the last time you foster childed an aids black kid?
>
thing to do. Black or white. What's your point?
Serene
Serene
> > All my guns, really? No big deal. I can count them on zero fingers.
> Really? Where do you live?
> Do you have lots of valuables?
> Can I come over and visit with you?
> Got any nubile daughters and a nice looking wife and a nice new car?
> Do you daughters know your stand on non-violence and gun ownership and do
> they have their own plans when daddy is on his sucking the home invader's
> dicks in a vain attempt to keep them from killing him?
> mapi
I don't have any guns either. But I have a great big dog. Come on by.
Serene
JETman
...and I have about five pounds of bloody hamburger meat to keep 'em busy!
Mapi
do something" about this and that and very rarely do you yourself do
anything except to vote for politicians to take away our money to fund your
socialist liberal programs.
It's like christians and church and the offering plate or leaving all your
money to the church when you die; they think they can buy their way into
heaven. You liberals think you can buy yourself some peace and get rid of
your guilt feelings by spending my money on useless feel-good projects that
only enrich the politicians, crooks and the grifters.
When you spend a year in the Peace corp, come back and talk to me.
mapi
"Serene" <sere...@home.comehomelassie> wrote in message
news:3B5EFDA1...@home.comehomelassie...
Mapi
What are you going to do? Gnaw me to death with your grandfather's false
teeth? Beat me with that baseball bat? Sic your Pomeranian on me?
Threaten to beat me up and thrash me with an inch of my life? Tell on me?
Call your daddy or mommy?
Sorry, but good old Sammy Colt and his "equalizer" is the only sure fire
weapon of first choice. Which is one reason why all dictatorships, facists,
whining liberals and cowards want all guns out of people's hands.
mapi
Mapi
"Serene" <sere...@home.comehomelassie> wrote in message
One shot to the head, and then he's after you. Nice defence.
When the burglar is laughing and kicking your bleeding dying dog down the
steps and he stalks up them to get to you, you'll wish you had re-thought
your abnormal liberal silly fear of a simple mechanical device that is the
greatest made equalizer for women.
mapi
Mapi
"JETman" <jeta...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:3B5F1B49...@worldnet.att.net...
>
>
> Serene wrote:
> >
> > Mapi wrote:
> >
> > > > All my guns, really? No big deal. I can count them on zero fingers.
> >
> > > Really? Where do you live?
> > > Do you have lots of valuables?
> > > Can I come over and visit with you?
> > > Got any nubile daughters and a nice looking wife and a nice new car?
> > > Do you daughters know your stand on non-violence and gun ownership and
do
> > > they have their own plans when daddy is on his sucking the home
invader's
> > > dicks in a vain attempt to keep them from killing him?
> > > mapi
> >
> > I don't have any guns either. But I have a great big dog. Come on by.
> > Serene
>
>
> ...and I have about five pounds of bloody hamburger meat to keep 'em busy!
And a plate of nice sweet tasting antifreeze.
Serene
> Not that I would advocate this but you do know a man with a gun ALWAYS wins against a
> man with a dog, you do know this?
You'd win, and then you'd end up in prison. So why would you even want
to take the chance? You'd hear my dog and keep walking if you had any
sense, but you don't.
Serene
Serene
> One shot to the head, and then he's after you. Nice defence.
>
> When the burglar is laughing and kicking your bleeding dying dog down the
> steps and he stalks up them to get to you, you'll wish you had re-thought
> your abnormal liberal silly fear of a simple mechanical device that is the
> greatest made equalizer for women.
>
> mapi
We don't get a lot of that kind of stuff in my silly liberal
neighborhood.
Serene
JETman
Mapi wrote:
>
> "JETman" <jeta...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> news:3B5F1B49...@worldnet.att.net...
> >
> >
> > Serene wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I don't have any guns either. But I have a great big dog. Come on by.
> > > Serene
> >
> >
> > ...and I have about five pounds of bloody hamburger meat to keep 'em busy!
>
> And a plate of nice sweet tasting antifreeze.
>
Naw, antifreeze takes too long to work. Gotta do the deed in about five
minutes or so......
Just keep the mutt busy 'cause he ain't 'ponsible fer his owner's plight....
JETman
Mapi wrote:
>
> "Serene" <sere...@home.comehomelassie> wrote in message
> news:3B5EFE1A...@home.comehomelassie...
> >
> >
> > I don't have any guns either. But I have a great big dog. Come on by.
> > Serene
>
> One shot to the head, and then he's after you. Nice defence.
>
> When the burglar is laughing and kicking your bleeding dying dog down the
> steps and he stalks up them to get to you, you'll wish you had re-thought
> your abnormal liberal silly fear of a simple mechanical device that is the
> greatest made equalizer for women.
>
> mapi
Thar's no justice like a carefully selected, "one behind the ear......."
--
Regards,
JT (Reloading in Austin, Texas)
Mapi
"Serene" <sere...@home.comehomelassie> wrote in message
"It will never happen to me."
7 million jews, 1 million gypsies, 14 million Ukranians, 200,000 Bosnia
Muslims, 3 million cambodians, Nicole Simpson, Susan Smith's children, and
millions of other dead, stupid humans all said the same thing.
Do you really want to forgo the use of a $150 security device for those
times that are the most deadly and the most dangerous, albiet unlikely times
you might really need one?
Do you buy life insurance?
If so, why won't you buy a gun?
It's a simple equation and a simple concept.
mapi'
Serene
> Do you really want to forgo the use of a $150 security device for those
> times that are the most deadly and the most dangerous, albiet unlikely times
> you might really need one?
>
> Do you buy life insurance?
> If so, why won't you buy a gun?
>
> It's a simple equation and a simple concept.
>
> mapi'
Because I have children, and kids find a way to get guns. Quit lecturing
me. I don't want a gun. I know all about guns, and my experiences don't
fit well into your fairy tail dreamland. I'm not against guns, I'm just
against them for me.
Serene
tommy...@austin.rr.com
infinitesimally low, I don't reckon she'll have to worry too much.
Probalby more to fear from drunken bubbas such as yourself accidently
firing a round through her front window while he shows off his latest
acquisition to his Kristian Kulture Klub butt buddies.
Then again, right-wing fear mongers such as your self never have been
known for having a very strong grip on reality, so what's the point?
Che'Gu Maru
> You're just as stupid as the racists.
>
> If you hate the racists so much.....
> "why
> > don't you leave and found your own little piece of intolerant facist
> heaven
> > up around the North Pole? There, at least, everything you'd see would
> be".... just like you
>
> mapi
Why, child, I HAVE found my own piece of heaven, but it is far from being
fascist (why don't you look up the actual MEANING of that word before you so
blithely toss it off as a perjorative. Since you're so much smarter than I am,
you won't have any problem using a dictionary now, will you?
Oh -- my piece of heaven is called The United States of America, a nation whose
principles are spelled out in two pieces of writing called The Declaration of
Independence and The Bill of Rights (first ten amendments) of the Constitution
of the United States.
Long ago and far away I took an oath to protect and defend that very same
Constitution. Since its underlying philsophy is diametrically opposed to the
racists and bigots, in attacking them (and, by extension you), I am still
upholding that oath.
(Was I speaking too fast for those of you taking notes?)
Che'Gu Maru
> Do you daughters know your stand on non-violence and gun ownership and do
> they have their own plans when daddy is on his sucking the home invader's
> dicks in a vain attempt to keep them from killing him?
>
> Why don't you just walk around with a big sign on your back " I have lots of
> money and refuse to defend myself. I trust you."?
>
> mapi
Ah, I am a liberal (which, paradoxically, is why I voted for George Bush this
time).
I believe in the Constitution of the United States of America -- ALL of it.
I believe in the principle of equality under the law, regardless of skin tone,
gender, religion, or any other irrelevant factor.
But I KNOW that the right to life logically implies the right to self-defense.
I KNOW that the right to self-defense is a specious right unless an individual
is permitted to obtain and use effective means of self-defense.
I am the NRA -- and I vote.
(Oh, and guess what: by most parameters, Charleton Heston is also a life-long
liberal who actively supported the Civil Rights Movement at a time when most
other "liberal" Hollywood actors were safely keeping their mouths shut. Do you
want to know where you find the most 1960's liberals who remain true to their
principles? In the NRA.)
Che'Gu Maru
Ah, but manners implies respect for others. That is precisely what is lacking
in the soul of a racist.
Che'Gu Maru
> So, when is the last time you foster childed an aids black kid?
>
When is the last time you read a book or thought for yourself?
Che'Gu Maru
I have to disagree with you here, dear Lady. I, too, have children, and they have
been taught that every gun in my house is always loaded. They have been taught
never to touch them when I am not with them, and they have been taught to shoot.
Just as you can train your child not to stick his finger into a light socket, so
can you train him not to pick up a gun.
The only protection we can really have against the violent racists is a firearm,
couipled with the will and training to use it at need. The police cannot protect
us, though they can arrest the perp AFTER he's tortured us to death.
In the end, each person must take responsibility for himself and the results of
his actions. That includes responsibility for defending himself and his family
against violent criminals of all stripes, shades, genders, and ethnicities.
Guns are the liberal's protection and the conservative's worst nightmare ....
Mapi
It costs about $10,000 for a good one.
A regular doberman or rottwieler is nothing more than a walking nice juicy
steak to the eyes of a Korean burglar.
I'll run like the wind if I thought the dog was a real attack trained dog,
with his vocal cords cut out making that wheezin noise at the last second as
he goes either for your testicles, throat or guts.
But if I were a burglar or a home invader, I'd go for Serena and that other
guy who advertised that they don't beleive in guns.
Wouldn't it be nice in your neighborhood if non-gun owners who made to put
little signs on their front yards to identify them?
mapi
"JETman" <jeta...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:3B5F5A50...@worldnet.att.net...
Mapi
"Che'Gu Maru" <chgu...@hal-pc.org> wrote in message
news:3B5F8A7F...@hal-pc.org...
> Mapi wrote:
> Long ago and far away I took an oath to protect and defend that very same
> Constitution. Since its underlying philsophy is diametrically opposed to
the
> racists and bigots, in attacking them (and, by extension you), I am still
> upholding that oath.
Geez. What idiots are they allowing to immigrate these days? You
obviously have no idea of what America is really all about.
I guess living in some slum outside Mexico city and sneaking across the
border and getting a free citizenship pass when that asshole Reagen made you
an instant citizen with no studying is telling.
>
> (Was I speaking too fast for those of you taking notes?)
>
mapi
Steve Henderson
> I have to disagree with you here, dear Lady. I, too, have children, and
they have
> been taught that every gun in my house is always loaded. They have been
taught
> never to touch them when I am not with them, and they have been taught to
shoot.
> Just as you can train your child not to stick his finger into a light
socket, so
> can you train him not to pick up a gun.
I was trained that way, and so were my children.
> The only protection we can really have against the violent racists is a
firearm,
> couipled with the will and training to use it at need. The police cannot
protect
> us, though they can arrest the perp AFTER he's tortured us to death.
Agreed.
> In the end, each person must take responsibility for himself and the
results of
> his actions. That includes responsibility for defending himself and his
family
> against violent criminals of all stripes, shades, genders, and
ethnicities.
Agreed.
> Guns are the liberal's protection and the conservative's worst nightmare
....
You are painting with entirely too broad a brush, and even then, don't
really have it right.
I consider myself more conservative than liberal and am highly trained in
the use (not misuse) of firearms. I own several.
There are more liberals than conservatives involved in the banning of
firearms.
Ironwood
> ->
> ->Mapi wrote:
> ->> Really? Where do you live?
> ->> Do you have lots of valuables?
> ->> Can I come over and visit with you?
> ->> Got any nubile daughters and a nice looking wife and a nice new car?
> ->> Do you daughters know your stand on non-violence and gun ownership and do
> ->> they have their own plans when daddy is on his sucking the home invader's
> ->> dicks in a vain attempt to keep them from killing him?
> ->> mapi
> ->
> On The Date Of Wed, 25 Jul 2001 17:12:59 GMT, Serene
<sere...@home.comehomelassie>
> Wrote The Followng:
> ->I don't have any guns either. But I have a great big dog. Come on by.
> ->Serene
>
"David Nathan Cole" <dnc...@yahoo.com> wrote...
> Not that I would advocate this but you do know a man with a gun ALWAYS wins
against a
> man with a dog, you do know this?
I don't know it. Let's see some proof.
Ironwood
> > Of course you would see it that way. Did I say anything about my "stand on
> > non-violence and gun ownership"? No, I did not. Did I say "I refuse to
> > defend myself" or that "I trust you"? No, of course not. Break into my house
and
> > see what you get.
> >
> > Typical knee-jerk reaction. Don't you know that jumping to foolish
> > conclusions can get you killed?
> >
> What are you going to do? Gnaw me to death with your grandfather's false
> teeth? Beat me with that baseball bat? Sic your Pomeranian on me?
> Threaten to beat me up and thrash me with an inch of my life? Tell on me?
> Call your daddy or mommy?
Only one way to find out.
> Sorry, but good old Sammy Colt and his "equalizer" is the only sure fire
> weapon of first choice. Which is one reason why all dictatorships, facists,
> whining liberals and cowards want all guns out of people's hands.
In your ludicrous opinion, to which you of course are entitled.
Ironwood
> > > > > This is America and people have the right to tell racist jokes.
> > > > >
> > > "Serene" <sere...@home.comehomelassie> wrote...
> > > > Are you a regular in ok.general that I don't know about? How about just
> > > > not cross-posting them in here?
> > > > Serene
> >
> > "Mapi" <Ma...@austin.rr.com> wrote...
> > > How about you shut the hell up you facist liberal socialist nanny idiot?
> >
> > How about you learn some manners?
>
> Ah, but manners implies respect for others. That is precisely what is lacking
> in the soul of a racist.
Agreed.
Mike Smith
>Of course, since the incidence of the situation you describe is
>infinitesimally low, I don't reckon she'll have to worry too much.
>Probalby more to fear from drunken bubbas such as yourself accidently
>firing a round through her front window while he shows off his latest
>acquisition to his Kristian Kulture Klub butt buddies.
>
>Then again, right-wing fear mongers such as your self never have been
>known for having a very strong grip on reality, so what's the point?
>
BWAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAA...........
Now we hear from a completely delusional extreme left-wing loony-toons
whacko complaining about Mapi not having a grip on reality.
This is too funny!
Mike Smith
Joseph Crowe
Che'Gu Maru wrote:
> Ah, I am a liberal (which, paradoxically, is why I voted for George Bush this
> time).
You might fit the mold of "classical" liberal, and you might even fit the mold
of 1960s liberal. The modern definition seems very difficult to pin down to
me. Same goes for conservative. Your views, from what I've read in austin.
general and talk.politics.guns, seem more lower case libertarian, if you have
to put a label on it.
>
> I believe in the Constitution of the United States of America -- ALL of it.
> I believe in the principle of equality under the law, regardless of skin tone,
> gender, religion, or any other irrelevant factor.
Yep, that's pretty much true, but it goes way beyond that. The U.S.C.
outlines powers of the government and limits on its powers, especially
with regards to individual rights. Individual rights from the view of the
U.S.C. trump government powers. We have the opposite case right now
in the U.S.
> But I KNOW that the right to life logically implies the right to self-defense.
> I KNOW that the right to self-defense is a specious right unless an individual
> is permitted to obtain and use effective means of self-defense.
That RKBA has even become an issue tells me how far we have strayed from
using the U.S.C. as a guide in the law. I suspect that does not surprise you.
> I am the NRA -- and I vote.
Ah, voting for the lesser of evils. Too bad we can't vote to throw the bastards
all out.......
> (Oh, and guess what: by most parameters, Charleton Heston is also a life-long
> liberal who actively supported the Civil Rights Movement at a time when most
> other "liberal" Hollywood actors were safely keeping their mouths shut. Do you
> want to know where you find the most 1960's liberals who remain true to their
> principles? In the NRA.)
That's a bit naive, IMO. The NRA really does not have a sterling record in
taking the right side in protecting RKBA. Further, the NRA and most of its
membership, seem like one issue advocates and where civil liberties that
do not relate to RKBA are concerned, the NRA and often large chunks of
its membership come down on the wrong side WRT respect of civil
liberties. That's another thread however.
Pax vobiscum,
J
--
Joseph Crowe
http://www.jcrowe.net/~jcrowe
mailto: jcr...@jcrowe.net
Serene
> > > > > Serene
Mapi wrote:
<snip>
> But if I were a burglar or a home invader, I'd go for Serena and that other
> guy who advertised that they don't beleive in guns.
What did I tell you guys about the idiots who can't get my name right?
This guy is even worse than the telemarketers, because he's got it
printed right in front of him, and he doesn't have to pronounce it. His
only challenge is copying down what he sees. Idiot.
Serene
Serene
> I have to disagree with you here, dear Lady. I, too, have children, and they have
> been taught that every gun in my house is always loaded. They have been taught
> never to touch them when I am not with them, and they have been taught to shoot.
Oh, really? How about the hundreds of deaths that occur every year from
kids who know all about guns, have been around them their whole lives,
and are trained, but then go and do something stupid. Like my nephew,
Tommy, son of a police officer. He took out his daddy's gun, which was
locked up, but he knew where the key was... he showed it to his friend,
and his friend shot him in the face. Some safety. Tell it to someone who
hasn't been there and doesn't know better.
And oh yeah, don't call me "dear lady." It's condescending, patronizing,
and implies that you know what the fuck you're talking about and that I
need your advice. I make decisions involving my fucking family based on
the funerals I've gone to of my family. Find someone else to preach to
who hasn't seen her family almost destroyed by guns. I'm not gonna be
convinced. Yours is philosophy. Mine is reality.
Serene
Not Me
Reality is that you want to take away my guns because your nephew was
too stupid to live, probably because his dad didn't emphasize gun
safety enough. Most of my friends own firearms, and have kids. Not
once has there been a problem, because the kids are taught proper gun
safety, and to never touch them when a parent isn't present. This is
reinforced by allowing them to touch the firearms when a parent is
present, thus removing the mystery and thrill of doing the forbidden.
Using your logic, I think we should ban cars because some drunk
misused his and killed my Aunt.
Serene
> Reality is that you want to take away my guns because your nephew was
> too stupid to live
Who said anything about wanting to take away anyone's guns? Just because
you want to live in a delusory fantasy that has people trying to take
away your guns doesn't mean you're going to drag me into it.
And did you read the part where I mentioned what his dad is a cop and
that Tommy was trained with firearms?
Serene
Medieval Knievel, the Adonis of Oklahoma
> Not Me wrote:
> > Reality is that you want to take away my guns because your nephew was
> > too stupid to live
Reality is nobody gives a shit about your guns.
--
********************
Medieval Knievel
ICQ # 26667824
"No, you can't change the password. You can erase it and create a new one,
but you can't "change" it. "--Chief schools ok.general on passwords
***********************
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
Mapi
state in public that they are morons don't generate a whole lot of respect
from me and if they did, I would bother to get their names right.
mapi]
"Serene" <sere...@home.comehomelassie> wrote in message
news:3B602D60...@home.comehomelassie...
Uncle Jerry
<sere...@home.comehomelassie> wrote:
>> > > > Serene wrote:
>
>> > > > > Serene
>Mapi wrote:
>
><snip>
>
>> But if I were a burglar or a home invader, I'd go for Serena and that other
>> guy who advertised that they don't beleive in guns.
>
>What did I tell you guys about the idiots who can't get my name right?
Sure enough.
You run into that kinda' thing when dealing with BumbleFucks(tm).
>This guy is even worse than the telemarketers, because he's got it
>printed right in front of him, and he doesn't have to pronounce it. His
>only challenge is copying down what he sees. Idiot.
>Serene
Evidently some guys just can't get it right no matter what...
- - - - -
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large crowds.
George Carlin
- - - - -
Steve Henderson
"Not Me" <no...@springmail.com> wrote in message
news:mqh0mtgv5ov3jjbsf...@4ax.com...
> >> I have to disagree with you here, dear Lady. I, too, have children,
and they have
> >> been taught that every gun in my house is always loaded. They have
been taught
> >> never to touch them when I am not with them, and they have been taught
to shoot.
> >
> >
> >Oh, really? How about the hundreds of deaths that occur every year from
> >kids who know all about guns, have been around them their whole lives,
> >and are trained, but then go and do something stupid. Like my nephew,
> >Tommy, son of a police officer. He took out his daddy's gun, which was
> >locked up, but he knew where the key was... he showed it to his friend,
> >and his friend shot him in the face. Some safety. Tell it to someone who
> >hasn't been there and doesn't know better.
> >And oh yeah, don't call me "dear lady." It's condescending, patronizing,
> >and implies that you know what the fuck you're talking about and that I
> >need your advice. I make decisions involving my fucking family based on
> >the funerals I've gone to of my family. Find someone else to preach to
> >who hasn't seen her family almost destroyed by guns. I'm not gonna be
> >convinced. Yours is philosophy. Mine is reality.
> >Serene
>
> Reality is that you want to take away my guns because your nephew was
> too stupid to live, probably because his dad didn't emphasize gun
> safety enough. Most of my friends own firearms, and have kids. Not
Liar. At NO point has she advocated taking your, or anyone else's, guns.
She simply stated that they were not for HER.
Are you a Bible-thumping Jesus freak reminiscent of the Waco bunch? The "If
you aren't with us, you are against us" bullshit?
There is a lot of difference between choosing not to indulge in something
and preaching about removing YOUR right to do a particular thing.
> once has there been a problem, because the kids are taught proper gun
> safety, and to never touch them when a parent isn't present. This is
> reinforced by allowing them to touch the firearms when a parent is
> present, thus removing the mystery and thrill of doing the forbidden.
Until and unless you can comprehend the difference between making a choice
not to own firearms or have them in your home and campaigning to remove all
of them, don't go away mad, just go the fuck away.
> Using your logic, I think we should ban cars because some drunk
> misused his and killed my Aunt.
Non sequitur, moron.
Serene
> Liar. At NO point has she advocated taking your, or anyone else's, guns.
> She simply stated that they were not for HER.
> There is a lot of difference between choosing not to indulge in something
> and preaching about removing YOUR right to do a particular thing.
Yes, that's all I'm saying. For me, I just don't want them in my house.
I think there was a time a few years ago where I may have shot my
husband if I had had one. And as a teen, if we had had a gun, who knows
if I would have shot myself at one point. It's my choice. I'm amazed at
all those who preach "freedom" seem to want to condemn the freedom to
not have a gun. Freedom means to each his own, as long as it doesn't
hurt anyone else. Why does the fact that I choose not to have a gun
cause such an angry reaction in some people? I don't try to force my
choice on anyone else, but the people who are always preaching freedom
and individual rights seem to forget all that when I make a choice that
is different from theirs.
Serene
Double Standards Suck. Big time. All the time.(tm-Jerry)
brooks n. texas
says...
> > >kids who know all about guns, have been around them their whole lives,
> > >and are trained, but then go and do something stupid.
Actually if you look at CDC stats guns are pretty low on the list, I did
a search from 1-18 years of age and got these figures-
Cause of Death Number of Deaths and Percentage of Deaths
MotorVehicle Traffic 6,270 61.5%
Drowning/submersion 1,294 12.7%
Fire/burn 632 6.2%
Suffocation 326 3.2%
Transport, other 238 2.3%
Firearm 236 2.3%
Poisoning 217 2.1%
Pedestrian, other 192 1.9%
Fall 168 1.6%
Struck by, against 117 1.1%
Unspecified 114 1.1%
Other specified and classifiable 101 1.0%
Natural/environmental 98 1.0%
Medical Care, Adverse Effects 76 0.7%
Machinery 67 0.7%
BT
Mapi
"Steve Henderson" <etao...@keytech.com> wrote in message
news:tlv6t75...@corp.supernews.com...
> > I consider myself more conservative than liberal and am highly trained
in
> the use (not misuse) of firearms. I own several.
>
> There are more liberals than conservatives involved in the banning of
> firearms.
>
>
The American world is topsy turvy; the former liberals have turned into
facists and socialists and the conservatives have turned into slavering
muttering religious assholes who want a theocracy of only their brand of
christianity, and who's left that are normal, responsible people who
basically know what's right and wrong and who love our constititution and
bill of rights and democracy?
Who?
Mapi
Mapi
shot a 100 AIDS ridden burglars who just finished eating his whole family
except for his sister and he saved her.
So there!
Therefore there should be a law that all brothers must carry handguns from
now on.
::::::: I was waiting for something really stupid to come out of your
blabbering illogical, liberal, uneducated mouth and you didn't disappoint
me.
Why is the hallmark of liberals and morons a propensity towards illogic,
stupid arguements and inability to think?
Nothing need more be said.
mapi
"Serene" <sere...@home.comehomelassie> wrote in message
news:3B602ECA...@home.comehomelassie...
Ironwood
> Like my friend's friend who's name was Tommy also. I think. Anyway, he
> shot a 100 AIDS ridden burglars who just finished eating his whole family
> except for his sister and he saved her.
> So there!
> Therefore there should be a law that all brothers must carry handguns from
> now on.
>
> ::::::: I was waiting for something really stupid to come out of your
> blabbering illogical, liberal, uneducated mouth and you didn't disappoint
> me.
>
> Why is the hallmark of liberals and morons a propensity towards illogic,
> stupid arguements and inability to think?
>
> Nothing need more be said.
Why is the hallmark of certain other people an inability to express themselves
clearly, and without vitriol?
Ironwood
> > What did I tell you guys about the idiots who can't get my name right?
> > This guy is even worse than the telemarketers, because he's got it
> > printed right in front of him, and he doesn't have to pronounce it. His
> > only challenge is copying down what he sees. Idiot.
"Mapi" <Ma...@austin.rr.com> wrote...
> Look Serendipity do dah whatever-da-fuck-yur-silly-name-is... people who
> state in public that they are morons don't generate a whole lot of respect
> from me and if they did, I would bother to get their names right.
So your problem is no self-respect. That explains much.
Larry Kessler
Those gun nuts get VERY upset about this issue. It's as if you were
discussing the prospect of cutting their dicks off.
piss...@off.com
l_k_e_s_s_l_e_r@w_t_._n_e_t says...
> Sooner or later, EVERY thread seems to morph into a gun debate.
>
> Those gun nuts get VERY upset about this issue. It's as if you were
> discussing the prospect of cutting their dicks off.
>
Larry don't cut my dick off, you might swallow it. Actually since you are
to lazy/stupid/uneducated to understand what the Constitution is/was
about feel free to call concerned citizens gun nuts. Thats as long as we
can call you shit head....
Ironwood
> > Sooner or later, EVERY thread seems to morph into a gun debate.
> >
> > Those gun nuts get VERY upset about this issue. It's as if you were
> > discussing the prospect of cutting their dicks off.
> >
> Larry don't cut my dick off, you might swallow it. Actually since you are
> to lazy/stupid/uneducated to understand what the Constitution is/was
> about feel free to call concerned citizens gun nuts. Thats as long as we
> can call you shit head....
I always enjoy it when someone who doesn't use proper spelling, punctuation or
grammar calls someone else "lazy/stupid/uneducated".
Serene
> Larry don't cut my dick off, you might swallow it. Actually since you are
> to lazy/stupid/uneducated to understand what the Constitution is/was
> about feel free to call concerned citizens gun nuts. Thats as long as we
> can call you shit head....
I think we need a new law about threads. They either end up referring to
Hitler, BJ's or guns, and at the point when one party calls another
party uneducated, the thread is degenerating to the point of no return.
I love it when someone calls me uneducated. That or when they call me
fat. Like either of those are going to bother a gal who had to work to
gain weight last year and graduated summa cum laude (not to mention
Cosby's "thank you, Lordy") with a B.S. in biochemistry, which means 72
hours of Chemistry, 6 hours of physics, and math through Calc 2. So to
me, that's just the writer's *own* insecurity showing through.
Here's the truth about income and education and voting trends:
Washington Post April 5, 2001
[Begin Partial Quote]
As recently as the 1988 contest between Michael S. Dukakis and George
Bush, voters
making more than $50,000 a year voted for the Republican by a 25
percentage point
margin, 62 percent to 37 percent. By the 2000 election, the spread in
the $50,000-plus
bracket fell to 7 percentage points, 53 percent Republican to 46 percent Democratic,
and to 11 percentage points -- 54 percent to 43 percent -- among the
richest voters,
those making more than $100,000.
In the process, some of the nation's best educated and highest income communities
have become Democratic bastions, and some of the nation's poorest white
counties --
especially in southern border states -- have turned into GOP strongholds.
In 2000, the voters in 17 out of 25 of the nation's most affluent
counties -- all with
high percentages!
of people with advanced degrees -- cast majorities for Al Gore,
sometimes by more
than 70 percent.
In nine out of the 10 poorest counties in Kentucky, for example, places
where the
Democratic Party of Harry S. Truman ran roughshod over Republican adversaries,
George W. Bush won, frequently by margins the mirror image of Gore's in
the nation's
richest and best educated counties.
These new voting patterns are changing the composition of the House.
According to a
study by the National Committee for an Effective Congress of the 88 congressional
districts that shifted from Democrat to Republican from 1994 to 2000, 59
had average
incomes below the national norm, and in 68, the percentage of residents
with college
degrees was below the national average.
Conversely, of the 46 seats that went from Republican to Democratic, 29
were districts
that had higher than average incomes.
The changes have not produced a full-scale reversal of the two parties' traditional
constituencies.
In the bottom half of the income levels, the Democratic Party remains
strong among
African Americans, Hispanics and white union members, while GOP support
has swelled
among nonunion whites. In the top half, there has been a realignment of white,
well-educated professionals (lawyers, doctors, scientists, academics),
now one of the
most reliably Democratic constituencies.
[end partial quote]
Mapi
I feel the same way about the first, third, and the rest of the admendments.
Too bad others are so willing to give up some of their basic rights for a
comfortable ostritch existence.
mapi
"Larry Kessler" <l_k_e_s_s_l_e_r@w_t_._n_e_t> wrote in message
news:3pc6mtgvu98307o7n...@4ax.com...
Cass
"Mapi" <Ma...@austin.rr.com> wrote in message
news:%s687.18029$v5.30...@typhoon.austin.rr.com...
Beelzebubba
> I love it when someone calls me uneducated. That or when they call me
> fat. Like either of those are going to bother a gal who had to work to
> gain weight last year and graduated summa cum laude (not to mention
> Cosby's "thank you, Lordy") with a B.S. in biochemistry, which means 72
> hours of Chemistry, 6 hours of physics, and math through Calc 2. So to
> me, that's just the writer's *own* insecurity showing through.
Uh huh <snicker>.
I, for one, make no such impressive (yet seemingly unverifiable) claims
to scholastic prowess or a svelte, girlish figure. I am but a lowly, 500
lb grease monkey who inhabits the dark recesses of Farm Road 525. I
dabble occasionally, being somewhat of an amateur man of science myself...
wandering to and fro in my mobile home. In fact, I assembled this home
computer out of spare parts from three working computers and a composite
touch screen that I adroitly thieved from a map kiosk in the Houston
Tunnel System.
> Here's the truth about income and education and voting trends:
>
> In the bottom half of the income levels, the Democratic Party remains
> strong among African Americans, Hispanics and white union members, while
> GOP support has swelled among nonunion whites. In the top half, there has
> been a realignment of white, well-educated professionals (lawyers,
> doctors, scientists, academics), now one of the most reliably Democratic
> constituencies.
So you believe that this indicates some sort of larger social trend
rather than just the voter demographics in one election? It has
nothing to do with the fact that Democrats have ditched their
progressive stance to make their party more palatable to the
American mainstream?
Come on.
Mike Smith
Let's see..... Who benefits from a restrictive government and/or stays
employed with a huge government? Plaintiff lawyers, professors,
scientists that receive federal grants? Yep, that about covers it.
(note: doctors thrown into above statement to make it sound good)
President Bush is a well-educated conservative, in case you forgot.
Terry McAuliffe forgot to mention to the Post that all of the east
coast and west coast major cities went democrat, too. Not to mention
the major cities around the Great Lakes.
You libs do get goofy when you are out of power. (Or is this more
"feel good" material about your defective logic?)
Mike Smith
Professor Vonroach
>Let's see..... Who benefits from a restrictive government and/or stays
>employed with a huge government? Plaintiff lawyers, professors,
>scientists that receive federal grants? Yep, that about covers it.
I'm sure it was an oversight but you forgot to mention federal
workers, their unions, and the trashy womanizing scum like Condit and
Clinton who deal with them.
>(note: doctors thrown into above statement to make it sound good)
>President Bush is a well-educated conservative, in case you forgot.
Doctors benefit from socialized medicine? ROFLMAO. They were signaling
warnings while the general public was still swallowing the bait. Let's
see _which_ `doctors' (new bureaucrat term=providor) might: Academics
in line for more government grants (includes medical school
faculties), political doctors want more control, er... guess that's
about it.
>Terry McAuliffe forgot to mention to the Post that all of the east
>coast and west coast major cities went democrat, too. Not to mention
>the major cities around the Great Lakes.
Did he note a slight difference in voting patterns in the suburbs
resulting from suburban flight to escape bureaucratic bungling in the
slum dominated cities? Cities around the Great Lakes have a very high
union presence with members led around by the union bosses, with that
usually goes high Afro-american density - another block vote that
obeys pathetic leaders. Some major cities have special situations -
NYC where a coalition of block votes by minority groups
(Afro-americans, Jews, Gays) can swing an election These are not
`individual voters', they are out for any advantage that they can sell
their vote for (usually very little except perhaps in the Jews seeking
dollars for Israel).
Serene
> Uh huh <snicker>.
>
> I, for one, make no such impressive (yet seemingly unverifiable) claims
> to scholastic prowess or a svelte, girlish figure. I am but a lowly, 500
> lb grease monkey who inhabits the dark recesses of Farm Road 525.
>I'll bet you do.
I'm not svelte. I graduated in 1993
> from OCUSA, and that's completely verifiable, because those in here know my full name and I'm sure that OCUSA's number is listed in the phone book. It's a small school, and you'll find that they're very helpful. Or you could call my favorite professor, Dr. Gibson, personally in the Science Dept. at 405-425-5404. And my picture is on Ben's website at the ok.general FAQ. Maybe Kris will come with me to Johnnie's
> soon, or MK's band will play sometime, and we'll all see each other.
> Certainly a good number of people on here have seen each other, and I
> knew that from the get-go, so I strived to make sure that every word I
> said was completely true and not exaggerated, as I would with any group
> of friends that I saw every day. Also, if I was going to lie about myself, I'd make me a lot more tan, with bigger boobs, and with a better car than I currently lease.
So you believe that this indicates some sort of larger social trend
> rather than just the voter demographics in one election? It has
> nothing to do with the fact that Democrats have ditched their
> progressive stance to make their party more palatable to the
> American mainstream?
>
> Come on.
Well, actually, yes. It's a very long article that tracks trends seen in
congressional races and Presidential races from the time of Dukakis vs.
Bush in 1988, as you might have noticed from part of the quote if you'd
been paying attention. But just in case, here's a link to the rest of
the article:
Mapi
"Serene" <sere...@home.comehomelassie> wrote in message
news:3B6351DC...@home.comehomelassie...
>
> > Larry don't cut my dick off, you might swallow it. Actually since you
are
> > to lazy/stupid/uneducated to understand what the Constitution is/was
> > about feel free to call concerned citizens gun nuts. Thats as long as we
> > can call you shit head....
>
> I think we need a new law about threads. They either end up referring to
> Hitler, BJ's or guns, and at the point when one party calls another
> party uneducated, the thread is degenerating to the point of no return.
> I love it when someone calls me uneducated. That or when they call me
> fat. Like either of those are going to bother a gal who had to work to
> gain weight last year and graduated summa cum laude (not to mention
> Cosby's "thank you, Lordy") with a B.S. in biochemistry, which means 72
> hours of Chemistry, 6 hours of physics, and math through Calc 2. So to
> me, that's just the writer's *own* insecurity showing through.
You too!?!? Amazing. I have all the same degrees to. Except I also work
for the CIA, and am Steven Hawkings proof reader and mentor.
This is besides the fact that I'm a handsome devil with muscles like Mr.
Atlas and look like Fabio.
mapi
Mapi
On one side are the stupid, the lazy and the people who suck at the
government's tit and have to vote democratic to keep the gravy train
rolling. Lump with them the liberals who haven't grown up yet and don't
make enough money to be concerned about taxes or savings.
On the other side are people who don't work for the government, make enough
money to actually pay taxes and believe in personal responsibility and
saving money for a rainy day and actually work and compete in the real world
for jobs, not at universities, unions or the government which only rewards
your ability to keep quiet and longevity to keep your job.
People who vote democrat are either young liberals or bloodsuckers.
People who vote republican are thrifty, hard working taxpayers who want to
keep their own money.
Pretty simplified, but that is the gist of them both.
mapi
"Mike Smith" <m...@wt.net> wrote in message
news:C4962305DF6D6686.757D917D...@lp.airnews.net...
tommy...@austin.rr.com
hot and bothered about their guns to compensate for their lack of, um,
equipment?
tommy...@austin.rr.com
>It's all really simple. Democrats and Republicans.
>
>On one side are the stupid, the lazy and the people who suck at the
>government's tit and have to vote democratic to keep the gravy train
>rolling. Lump with them the liberals who haven't grown up yet and don't
>make enough money to be concerned about taxes or savings.
>
>On the other side are people who don't work for the government, make enough
>money to actually pay taxes and believe in personal responsibility and
>saving money for a rainy day and actually work and compete in the real world
>for jobs, not at universities, unions or the government which only rewards
>your ability to keep quiet and longevity to keep your job.
>
>People who vote democrat are either young liberals or bloodsuckers.
>
>People who vote republican are thrifty, hard working taxpayers who want to
>keep their own money.
>
>Pretty simplified, but that is the gist of them both.
>
>mapi
>
>
>
Nice try, Mapi, but you're delusional. There are plenty of thrifty,
hard working taxpayers who vote for Democrats. Most of them realize
that greed is not good and helping out the less fortunate is
positively Christian. Moreover, they reject the hate-filled Republican
rhetoric for what it really is ...
you...@mydong.com
pa...@austin.rr.com says...
> Of course they feel that way Larry. Don't you know that they get all
> hot and bothered about their guns to compensate for their lack of, um,
> equipment?
the stretch marks on her face.....
-One of them
Mike Smith
And now we have heard from the hate-filled ultra-left-wing group.
BTW, another difference is conservatives will give their own money to
help the poor and down-trodden. The liberals want to help out the poor
with "other people's money", not their own. (Yes, liberals tend to be
hypocrites)
Mike Smith
tommy...@austin.rr.com
>
>BTW, another difference is conservatives will give their own money to
>help the poor and down-trodden. The liberals want to help out the poor
>with "other people's money", not their own. (Yes, liberals tend to be
>hypocrites)
>
>Mike Smith
I know plenty of liberals who give generously of their own money to
help out others. In fact, I've already given my tax "rebate" to a
local homeless shelter. No doubt you spent yours on more Nazi regalia.
It's the conservatives I know who could give a flip about helping
others -- remember, conservatives are the self-centered, greedy
hypocrites who think everyone else is here to serve their needs.
Mike Smith
And, once again, our anonymous, clueless, extreme left-wing, typical,
lying liberal shows us how truly ignorant he is.
Do you liberals really want this type of anonymous, lying bozo
representing your side of the political spectrum? Of course you do.
That's why you're liberals.
Mike Smith
Ironwood
> >>BTW, another difference is conservatives will give their own money to
> >>help the poor and down-trodden. The liberals want to help out the poor
> >>with "other people's money", not their own. (Yes, liberals tend to be
> >>hypocrites)
> >>
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 23:00:34 GMT, tommy...@austin.rr.com wrote:
> >I know plenty of liberals who give generously of their own money to
> >help out others. In fact, I've already given my tax "rebate" to a
> >local homeless shelter. No doubt you spent yours on more Nazi regalia.
> >
> >It's the conservatives I know who could give a flip about helping
> >others -- remember, conservatives are the self-centered, greedy
> >hypocrites who think everyone else is here to serve their needs.
>
> And, once again, our anonymous, clueless, extreme left-wing, typical,
> lying liberal shows us how truly ignorant he is.
>
> Do you liberals really want this type of anonymous, lying bozo
> representing your side of the political spectrum? Of course you do.
> That's why you're liberals.
Okay, so you're both fond of generalizing. Now take it outside.
Adam Weiss
My experience has been that the worst democrat is one from old money.
This democrat believes that high taxes are fine because they themselves
have no problem paying them. They've never had to build wealth and
savings because they inherited those. I'd wager to say that Serene is
one of these. She has admitted to being rich enough to pay her taxes
with no problem at all, and has furthurmore admitted to living in a very
posh and exclusive neighborhood.
Me, I was a liberal. Then two things happened. First, Bill Clinton got
blown by Lewinscrew. Second, and much more importantly, I lived in New
York City for a year. On an income of $20,000, I paid over $6,000 in
taxes. That left me with $14,000 to live on for the whole year, and in
New York City that's a paltry sum. After that experience I simply
cannot align myself with a political party that doesn't at least attempt
(even if they fail in the end) to lower taxes.
--
Adam Weiss
w...@whazo.com
--
"It's all fun and games until someone pokes an eye out, or until you see
the blue lights in the mirror"
--
tommy...@austin.rr.com
Of course, truth has never gotten in the way of a good right-wing
pogrom.
Les Cargill
I dunno about "worst", but there are no old money Democrats,
except for the odd seventh son of a seventh son( who probably
doesn't have any money, anyway ). Old money in the US is Republican
and says "Boola Boola".
There is the odd Yella Dawg in the South who is still Democrat out
of habit, but that's falling quickly. The South isn't very Southern
anymore.
There are a few old hardcore Yankees who are still Democrat, but
they're disappearing rapidly, too.
> I'd wager to say that Serene is
> one of these.
This is funny. I don't think it's true, although I don't know.
> She has admitted to being rich enough to pay her taxes
> with no problem at all, and has furthurmore admitted to living in a very
> posh and exclusive neighborhood.
Most people have no trouble at all paying taxes, because the Gov't gets
first cut. We don't feel a thing.
>
> Me, I was a liberal. Then two things happened. First, Bill Clinton got
> blown by Lewinscrew.
Tragic.
> Second, and much more importantly, I lived in New
> York City for a year. On an income of $20,000, I paid over $6,000 in
> taxes. That left me with $14,000 to live on for the whole year, and in
> New York City that's a paltry sum.
<silence>
In Tulsa, that's a paltry sum. Hell, that's poor in Jay. The 6K couldn't have
been all Federal, because you qualified for EIC at that level. Look,
in NYC the epxected behavior is to go into crime until you get some seed
money together. It's understood. NYC is the nexus of the Survival Ethic.
> After that experience I simply
> cannot align myself with a political party that doesn't at least attempt
> (even if they fail in the end) to lower taxes.
The Republicans will raise your taxes faster than the Dems, generally (other
than FDR and Johnson ). Nobody raised taxes faster than Reagan. The '86 plan
like to wiped the country out. The Repoblicans take the "to provide for a
common defense" thing literally.
> --
>
> Adam Weiss
> w...@whazo.com
>
> --
>
> "It's all fun and games until someone pokes an eye out, or until you see
> the blue lights in the mirror"
>
> --
tommy...@austin.rr.com
"Oh dear, you mean the Republicans LIED about the tax cut?"
http://quote.bloomberg.com/fgcgi.cgi?T=uspolitics_news.ht&s=AO2HN4hWeSW50ZXJu
JETman
Adam Weiss wrote:
>
>
>
> My experience has been that the worst democrat is one from old money.
> This democrat believes that high taxes are fine because they themselves
> have no problem paying them. They've never had to build wealth and
> savings because they inherited those. I'd wager to say that Serene is
> one of these. She has admitted to being rich enough to pay her taxes
> with no problem at all, and has furthurmore admitted to living in a very
> posh and exclusive neighborhood.
>
> Me, I was a liberal. Then two things happened. First, Bill Clinton got
> blown by Lewinscrew. Second, and much more importantly, I lived in New
> York City for a year. On an income of $20,000, I paid over $6,000 in
> taxes. That left me with $14,000 to live on for the whole year, and in
> New York City that's a paltry sum. After that experience I simply
> cannot align myself with a political party that doesn't at least attempt
> (even if they fail in the end) to lower taxes.
> --
>
> Adam Weiss
> w...@whazo.com
>
> --
>
Gad, $14K in NYC is waaaaaaaaaaay below the poverty line.
Did you dine on "roof rabbits" for protein???
<G>
--
Regards,
JT (Residing in Austin, Texas)
Just Tooling Down The Internet Superhighway With my G4.......
Adam Weiss
<<snipped>>
>
> > Second, and much more importantly, I lived in New
> > York City for a year. On an income of $20,000, I paid over $6,000 in
> > taxes. That left me with $14,000 to live on for the whole year, and in
> > New York City that's a paltry sum.
>
> <silence>
>
> In Tulsa, that's a paltry sum. Hell, that's poor in Jay. The 6K couldn't have
> been all Federal, because you qualified for EIC at that level. Look,
> in NYC the epxected behavior is to go into crime until you get some seed
> money together. It's understood. NYC is the nexus of the Survival Ethic.
No, the $6k wasn't all federal. In fact, only about 1/3 of it, $2k
was. Another $2k or $3k was New York State income tax, and then another
$1k or $2k in municpal taxes. I guess something has to keep Albany New
York on its feet. That city's been stuck in a recession since 1970, and
the only thing left there is the state government of New York (oh, and
SUNY Albany). And I guess it must take alot of money to keep the
subways in the "shitty" (New York City) running so damned slow.
To be honest, another huge problem was housing costs. I paid over half
of my net income on rent. As a general rule, you're not supposed to pay
more than 1/3 net income on housing. But the only housing to be found
for $390 a month in New York City is in dangerous government subsidized
housing projects and is reserved for jobless mothers. (Oh, and this
housing has a long waiting list even for jobless mothers willing to live
in gangland).
>
> > After that experience I simply
> > cannot align myself with a political party that doesn't at least attempt
> > (even if they fail in the end) to lower taxes.
>
<<snipped>>
Mapi
"Adam Weiss" <aw...@pdq.net> wrote in message
news:6E5EAC54F5C27DDC.6E9A436D...@lp.airnews.net...
> My experience has been that the worst democrat is one from old money.
> This democrat believes that high taxes are fine because they themselves
> have no problem paying them. They've never had to build wealth and
> savings because they inherited those. I'd wager to say that Serene is
> one of these. She has admitted to being rich enough to pay her taxes
> with no problem at all, and has furthurmore admitted to living in a very
> posh and exclusive neighborhood.
No kidding. Remember those assholes Warren Buffet and Bill Gates urging
congress not to
give inheritence tax breaks during the tax cut?
Hell, 55% of 3 billion dollars is 1.5 billion left for one little girl.
Assholes.
Why don't they put on a long white wig, stand on a balcony and yell to the
middle class crowd below " let
them eat cake!"?
I hope what happened to clueless Louis and Marie Antoinette happens sooner
or later to our new aristocracy.
>
> Me, I was a liberal. Then two things happened. First, Bill Clinton got
> blown by Lewinscrew. Second, and much more importantly, I lived in New
> York City for a year. On an income of $20,000, I paid over $6,000 in
> taxes. That left me with $14,000 to live on for the whole year, and in
> New York City that's a paltry sum. After that experience I simply
> cannot align myself with a political party that doesn't at least attempt
> (even if they fail in the end) to lower taxes.
Then don't forget the sales tax you paid on everything, the tax on your
phone bill, your cell phone,
taxes taxes upon taxes and then the tax if you saved your money and then
wanted to use it to pay for your hemorrhoids operation that your HMO won't
cover, because, they can.
It's the hidden taxes, the "it's only pennies a day" tax that really gets
you.
Like toll roads.
> --
>
> Adam Weiss
> w...@whazo.com
>
> --
>
> "It's all fun and games until someone pokes an eye out, or until you see
> the blue lights in the mirror"
>
> --
mapi
Mapi
"Les Cargill" <lcar...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:3B6617C9...@worldnet.att.net...
>
>
> Adam Weiss wrote:
> >
> > > > You libs do get goofy when you are out of power. (Or is this more
> > > > "feel good" material about your defective logic?)
> > > >
> > > > Mike Smith
> >
> > My experience has been that the worst democrat is one from old money.
> > This democrat believes that high taxes are fine because they themselves
> > have no problem paying them. They've never had to build wealth and
> > savings because they inherited those.
>
> I dunno about "worst", but there are no old money Democrats,
> except for the odd seventh son of a seventh son( who probably
> doesn't have any money, anyway ). Old money in the US is Republican
> and says "Boola Boola".
I guess you never heard of Al Gore and the Kennedies, to just mention a few
of the
filthy rich democrats that run our country.
>
> There is the odd Yella Dawg in the South who is still Democrat out
> of habit, but that's falling quickly. The South isn't very Southern
> anymore.
>
> There are a few old hardcore Yankees who are still Democrat, but
> they're disappearing rapidly, too.
The biggest increasing demographic, that is scaring the shit out of the
repubs and dems,
are the "independents".
One reason why that moron Al Gore lost the election. Ralph Nader.
Independent. Anyone but the above
voters.
Give me a third choice in any election and 8 out of 10 times I'm going to
vote 3rd party even if it's a rabid chipmunk with delusions of grandeur and
a little brushy mustache and a funny salute.
>
> > The Republicans will raise your taxes faster than the Dems, generally
(other
> than FDR and Johnson ). Nobody raised taxes faster than Reagan. The '86
plan
> like to wiped the country out. The Repoblicans take the "to provide for a
> common defense" thing literally.
You need to study history before you spout off stuff your liberal parents
indoctrinated into
you while they were stoned at the Greatful dead concert.
Go do your own research.
Suffice to say you're backackwards.
mapi
Mike Smith
Generalizing??!!??
I'm not generalizing. I am dead-on accurate about this idiot. Every
single descriptive word I posted clearly and precisely describes this
imbecile.
When the lefties post their lies, I'll be happy to point them out for
the lies that they are.
Mike Smith
Mike Smith
>Anonymous yes. Lying no. {lie}
>
>Of course, truth has never gotten in the way of a good right-wing
>pogrom. {lie}
>
>>>On Sun, 29 Jul 2001 19:58:52 -0500, Mike Smith <m...@wt.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>BTW, another difference is conservatives will give their own money to
>>>>help the poor and down-trodden. The liberals want to help out the poor
>>>>with "other people's money", not their own. (Yes, liberals tend to be
>>>>hypocrites)
>>>>
>>>>Mike Smith
>>On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 23:00:34 GMT, tommy...@austin.rr.com wrote:
>>>I know plenty of liberals who give generously of their own money to
>>>help out others. {lie} In fact, I've already given my tax "rebate" to a
>>>local homeless shelter. {lie} No doubt you spent yours on more Nazi regalia. {lie}
>>>
>>>It's the conservatives I know who could give a flip about helping
>>>others --{lie} remember, conservatives are the self-centered, {lie} greedy {lie}
>>>hypocrites {lie} who think everyone else is here to serve their needs {lie}.
Hmmmm.........
I'm counting 10 lies in this Austin idiot's post. The anonymous
imbecile has an uncanny knack for lying. I think he's related to one
of the clinoons.
BTW, try to figure out how to NOT top-post. (headers arranged so we
all know who posted what.)
Mike Smith
Serene
> My experience has been that the worst democrat is one from old money.
> This democrat believes that high taxes are fine because they themselves
> have no problem paying them. They've never had to build wealth and
> savings because they inherited those. I'd wager to say that Serene is
> one of these. She has admitted to being rich enough to pay her taxes
> with no problem at all, and has furthurmore admitted to living in a very
> posh and exclusive neighborhood.
I never said either one of those things. We've struggled plenty. And if
payroll taxes were cut, maybe you'd be helped in the above situation,
but while making only $20,000 a year, you're not paying a whole lot in
income taxes. Most of those taxes are payroll taxes, which the Democrats
tried to cut this year, but Bush would have none of it.
New York is one expensive place to live. They practically charge you to breathe.
Serene
Serene
<snip>
> The biggest increasing demographic, that is scaring the shit out of the
> repubs and dems,
> are the "independents".
<snip>
I'd have voted for McCain this year if I'd had a chance. I actually did
vote for him in the Primary. (Imagine that, a registered Republican.) He
may be somewhat of a media darling, but I liked him a heck of a lot more
than Gore or Bush.
Serene