Most turprising seeing no gassing proved and even the existence of treblinka doubtful

[mose]

IN FACT YOU CAN EARN $250,000.00 IF YOU CAN SUBSTANTIATE ANY OF THE TREBLINKA CLAIMS AS DESCRIBED BELOW.

AND   - CHECK THE TALMUD WHICH ENCOURAGES JEWISH CRIMINAL ACTIONS AGAINST NON JEWS.

http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-6657600254881054584&hl=en

 

http://www.nafcash.com/

Forensic Experts Prove Holocaust Gas Chamber Myth a “Sheer Impossibility”

AND CONSIDERING THE ABOVE WHAT IS THE PROSECUTION CASE AGAINST DEMANJUK AS THERE WAS NO GASSING SO IF THERS WAS AN IVAN THE TERRIBLE WHAT DID HE DO? THAT WAS SO TERRIBLE? ACTING LIKE A GUARD?

The alleged Treblinka diesel gas chamber lie is only the latest on a long list of ever changing, ludicrous killing methods claimed by the “eyewitnesses” that have been totally debunked by forensic experts.

SO WHAT IS THE REASON FOR CHARGING THE MAN AGAIN? SIMPLY THE KANGAROO COURTS  SET UP IN GERMANY CAN CONVICT ANYONE THE JEWS SEND TO COURT, AS WITH THE IRVING CASE,

A SHOW OF POWER BY THE JEWS RO FRIGHTEN THE STEADILY INCREASING DISBELIEF IN THE HOLOCAUST STOTY?

 

THE TREBLINKA HOLOHOAX

According to the orthodox version of the holocaust, at Treblinka, the Germans allegedly murdered and buried, then dug up, burned and crushed the bones, and then reburied all the remains of the 870,000 jews into the same “huge mass graves;” thus, they allegedly “obliterated all evidence of their crime.” If you’re unfamiliar with the controversies surrounding this “judicially proven fact,” then it’s imperative that before you read any further, you understand the forensic argumentation presented in this link  (http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=3166)

Nothing remains? Who in their right mind could believe that a perfect crime could be committed while murdering 870,000 people? Everyone knows that at every crime scene - EVIDENCE IS LEFT BEHIND: “Cremated remains weigh between three and nine pounds.” In order to believe the orthodox Treblinka holocaust legend, you must believe this: The Germans, by putting a layer of soil over millions of pounds of bone fragments, tens of millions of teeth and tens of thousands of bullets and shell casings somehow, magically - “utterly eradicated” all evidence of their crime!

 

John Demjanjuk's vindication -- culminating in his recent reunion with his family in the United States -- has special meaning for Jerome Brentar. For more than a decade, this deeply religious man of Croatian ancestry and anti-Communist conviction has devoted countless hours of his own time and considerable money from his own pocket to help defend the Ukrainian-American auto worker.

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v13/v13n6p-2_Brentar.html

 

An Evil Campaign to Frame an Innocent Man

• The Demjanjuk Affair: The Rise and Fall of a Show-Trial, by Yoram Sheftel. London: Victor Gollancz, 1994. 379 pages.      http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v15/v15n6p45_Jones.html   

  On July 29, 1993, John Demjanjuk was acquitted by the Israeli Supreme Court of the charge of being the sadistic Treblinka guard "Ivan the Terrible." This book, written by his Israeli attorney, deals with the pivotal Israeli chapter of his 16 year ordeal.

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v11/v11p238_Cobden.html      An Expert on 'Eyewitness' Testimony Faces a Dilemma in the Demjanjuk Case

 

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v12/v12p109_Cobden.html

As Rosten uneasily observes, "some Jews use gay in a pejorative sense," which seems to fit most of Dershowitz's applications; so his decision to descend into this sort of calculatedly abrasive vocabulary certainly sets a bizarre tone for one trumpeted as a great civil libertarian who is demanding more sensitivity toward Jewish and "minority" concerns. Moreover, it seems an oddly Orwellian doublespeak from the principal architect of the sinister and one-sided "anti-hate" (or better, anti-White laws now being hammered into place across the country.

 

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v13/v13n6p36_Weber.html    Anti-Revisionist Work Takes Aim at Faurisson

For years now, Vidal-Naquet has been the Nemesis of Faurisson, even testifying against him in court. While he has repeatedly claimed that he does not believe that Faurisson should be brought to trial because of his views, he has belied this by his actions. In an English-language interview broadcast on American radio in mid-December 1992, Vidal-Naquet said that he opposes laws that criminalize revisionism, but also stated: "I hate Faurisson. If I could, I would kill him personally."

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v12/v12p133_Allen.html     After the death sentence was handed down, Demjanjuk's family was able to discover previously suppressed evidence -- much of it from Soviet Russian archives -- indicating that the real "Ivan the Terrible" was another Ukrainian named Ivan Marchenko (or Marczenko). This new evidence discredited the courtroom testimony of five Jewish camp survivors, each of whom had "positively" identified Demjanjuk as the sadistic mass murderer of Treblinka. (note 1)