9/11’s GUIDED MISSILES
VTR
http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=296
MORE AND MORE AVIATION EXPERTS are now saying that it was highly unlikely that barely
novice-grade Arab ‘pilots’ could expertly maneuver the 9/11 jetliners into the World Trade
Towers on September 11 2001. Instead, because of advance aviation technology, experts are
contending that the 9/11 airplanes were guided by remote control.
There is ample evidence of US robotized military jets being operational long before September
of 2001. Here is a report from a Northrop Grunman pilot about the robot plane, Global Hawk:
“Global Hawk is the world’s most advanced unmanned aerial vehicle and holds the World Record of
31 hours for an unmanned flight. It has over 1000 total flight hours with four operational
aircraft.
On 22 April 2001, Global Hawk flew non-stop and unmanned from Edwards Air Force Base in
California to Edinburgh RAAF Base, South Australia. Global Hawk returned unmanned to Edwards
Air Force Base, California on 7 June 2001? Here.
On January 23 2008, BBC published a corroborating article regarding the use of unmanned robot
planes used by the US & UK military for “scientific” use.
The question now is what happened to the pilots & the passengers on the two airplanes, American
Airlines Flight 11, & United Airlines Flight 175?
9/11 experts are contending that the pilots’ controls were wiped out by Electro Magnetic Pulse
technology (EMP) that can disable on-board flight controls of targeted aircraft at command.
To add insult to injury, (3000 9/11 victims murdered), the US had already developed a method in
the 1970’s whereby they could rescue hijacked planes by intervening into the automatic pilot
system. Why didn’t NORAD use this method of intervention on 9/11?
‘DIFFERENT’ PLANES - SAME FOLKS
Aircraft Photos From Scott Myer’s Web Site Here - Copyright 2001
“WERE DIFFERENT PLANES USED in the WTC strikes?” many are now asking. Evidence of a difference
in the fuselage size and the plane nose of United Airlines Flight 175 proves that a different
airplane was utilized as a guided missile — whose target was the South Tower of the World Trade
Center.
United Airlines Flight 175 was a “Boeing 767-200 series” with its characteristic “stubby nose.”
Photos of the aircraft crashing into the South Tower, (allegedly United Flight 175), reveal a
different aircraft with longer fuselage dimensions and a longer & fuller nose. (See many photos
Here)
OBAMA & THE ROCKEFELLER/BRZEZINSKI CONNECTION
THE RENOWNED POLITICAL ANALYIST, Webster Tarpley, recently brought to light the political
connection between presidential candidate, Barack Obama, & David Rockefeller’s favorite foreign
policy advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski. Tarpley informs us that Brzezinski has been advising Obama
since March of 2008.
Prior to this recent confirmation by Tarpley, in January of 2002, shortly after the 9/11
attack, the highly respected former German Minister of Technology, Andreas von Buelow, had this
to say with regard to 9/11 & Brzezinski’s geopolitical agenda:
“Brzezinski, the mad dog, as advisor to President Jimmy Carter, campaigned for the exclusive
right of the US to seize all the raw materials of the world, especially oil and gas.
The events of 9/11 fit perfectly within the scope of the operations of the CIA intelligence
agency and the US military-industrial-complex. Justified by the events of 9/11, huge raw
material reserves of the former Soviet Union nations and pipeline routes are now at their
disposal” Here.
The Mossad, Israel’s version of the CIA, works very closely with the CIA and the US
military/industrial complex. This was recently evidenced by Russia’s accusation that Israel
played a central role in training Georgian troops for the invasion of S.Ossetia.
Methinks That There Is A Very Close Connection Between The Events Of 9/11
And Israel’s Murderous Intelligence Agency Known As The Mossad…
___________________________________
For More See: “9-11 & The Jewish Gatekeepers” Click Here
And: “Larry Silverstein: 9-11’s Inside Man!” Click Here
And: “9/11’s Cover-Up Man: Zionist Zelikow” Click Here
And: “9-11’s Real & Phony Spies” Click Here
And: “Exposing The Mossad” Click Here
Al Dykes
VTR <vexj...@gmx.us> wrote:
>
>http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=296
>
>MORE AND MORE AVIATION EXPERTS are now saying that it was highly unlikely that barely
>novice-grade Arab ‘pilots’ could expertly maneuver the 9/11 jetliners into the World Trade
>Towers on September 11 2001. Instead, because of advance aviation technology, experts are
Shouldn't that be singular, ONE alleged expert and he says things that
are silly to the 99.999% of knowledgable people and he refuses to
speak in public to these people and answer relevant questions.
Wy should I believe him?
--
Al Dykes
News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising.
- Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail
End.of.an.Error.012009
> http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=296
>
> MORE AND MORE AVIATION EXPERTS are now saying that it was highly unlikely that barely
> novice-grade Arab ‘pilots’ could expertly maneuver the 9/11 jetliners into the World Trade
> Towers on September 11 2001. Instead, because of advance aviation technology, experts are
> contending that the 9/11 airplanes were guided by remote control.
<< snip >>
Aren't there better things to do than come up with ridiculous conspiracy
theories about 9/11?
--
Obama '08. History in the making!
http://www.cafepress.com/saproducts/6033655
VTR
> In article <kN6dnaozjZd76XLV...@comcast.com>,
> VTR <vexj...@gmx.us> wrote:
>> http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=296
>>
>> MORE AND MORE AVIATION EXPERTS are now saying that it was highly unlikely that barely
>> novice-grade Arab ‘pilots’ could expertly maneuver the 9/11 jetliners into the World Trade
>> Towers on September 11 2001. Instead, because of advance aviation technology, experts are
>
>
>
>
> Shouldn't that be singular, ONE alleged expert and he says things that
> speak in public to these people and answer relevant questions.
>
> Wy should I believe him?
>
Your purpose isn't finding the truth, yours is hiding it. Any person with some brains can tell
that the official narrative about 9/11 is bullshit. Painful deceptions shows you how it is more
likely a global hawk than flight 77.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1336167662031629480
Al Dykes
There is a massive amount of hard science and evidence for the
"standard story". The "Half Truth Movement" doesn't dispute this
evidence, they do their damnedest to make sure people don't know it
exists.
In order to believe what you parrot, you have to be ignorant of a whole list
of things.
Ordinary knowledge of any single one of the topics in this list when
applied to the evidence and eyewitness accounts would clue you into the
fact that the claims of the "Truth Movement" are silly. Deeper and
broader investigation into any or all of these subjects will just show
how stupid the claims really are.
Physics, Aviation, aviation crash scene forensics, DNA analysis, the
characteristics and capabilities of Radio and Radar, the
organization of our military forces and the capabilities of the
aircraft as of 2001, structural engineering, metallurgy, demolition,
how the insurance industry works, NY Fire department training,
materials science, the history and expertise of NIST, Computer Data
Center operations, Security and construction practices in large 24x7
Manhattan buildings, flaws in the radio systems at WTC, all the
physical evidence and all the eyewitnesses statements, the massive
archive of video and same-day reporting that is in the archives of
all the media at Shanksville, Washington and NYC, and the history of
the Mid-east for the last 100 years.
I missed one; the meaning and use of metaphor and simile
in impromptu speech.
There are specific topics in that list that I would love to discuss
face-to-face with one of the self-described eyewitnesses that speaks
at Twoofer events and makes claims that don't make sense to me based
on my 30 years doing what he says he did immediatly prior to 9/11.
For each of those topics, 99.9999% of the knowledgeable people in the
world say the k00ks are wrong and the handful of people that claim
"Truth Movement" claims refuse to speak in public and answer polite,
relevant questions.
Why should I believe them?