weaponization of conscience, cybercrime" - Novel Systems Theory & Tragedy

10 views
Skip to first unread message

Joseph Arabasz MD

unread,
Feb 20, 2025, 12:22:43 PMFeb 20
to
Subject- weaponization of conscience, cybercrime" - Novel Systems Theory & Tragedy
descriptions of the psyops sensory overload programs

Dear Topica,

FYI-
                                                                                                                                                        Biblical concept of "confounding" has been codified now with Publication of weaponization of conscience Research Article 2024

     Modern Text, "Forbidden Archeology" has described hidden oratory wars, eg, "While others toil and war, we do it with our voices

     Apparently, weaponization of conscience sotto voce, subliminal messaging sociopathy is often experienced after brain fog events, such as biologically with post covid, &c, or other gaseous attacks, when People are being stalked

"the Race to understand postcovid-19 conditions"
     "For more than a decade after the 1918 influenza pandemic, a mysterious Parkinson-like syndrome with sleep disturbance, hypomimia (aka lack of facial expression), and a high mortality rate developed in people over the globe. In 1920 the U.S. Surgeon General declared that the syndrome, popularly termed 'encephalitis lethargica,' was caused by influenza

excerpted-
March 2024
"Abstract and Figures
     This article mentions the concept of weaponization of conscience as a complex system and tactics employed by conartist aggressors to camouflage their activity, coerce others, or to deceive their victims. This study uses the conceptual approach, drawing from the theoretical underpinnings of military propaganda and psychological operations doctrines (aka psyops, now apparently used against other Military Veterans or Civilians) and adapting them to serve as a lens through which to understand and defend against weaponization of conscience (which is used to drive others to distraction, etc and apparently occurs with stalker scams)

     But Dr Axelrod's "Evolution of Cooperation" corollary concept is apparently that scamming, while pretending to cooperate always ends with etc, and might ameliorate such sociopathy
     As You are probably aware, hegemony is the opposite of cooperation
Professor of Political Science and Public Policy
Dr. Axelrod is a member of the American National Academy of Sciences and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. His honors include a MacArthur Foundation Fellowship for the period 1987 through 1992, &c

     While the management style of ivan is now always attack, since bully greed doesn't have any limits or presumed constraints, some protagonists must anticipate, react differently

     But the prospective, pre-emptive view is to warn Ivan that all those decorative globes would disappear from their pretty buildings if attacks occur
     Hardly meant to be tongue at mucosa comment, but serious
But that opinion is countered, apparently, by ivan's baths, now with antler serum

And the beat progresses more loudly, as People wonder if the dozen zoned ivan dislikes the nazi more than vice versa
     Some WWII Generals commented that ivan's territorialistic gang ambitions, etc should be immediately curtailed- only one of them got back to America alive
     Using the carrot and stick approach isn't always the answer, as it apparently is often misinterpreted

     Shouldn't use the sotto voce scammers

Best wishes always
Thank You for Your assistance with this matter

Cordially,

Joseph W Arabasz MD
S/P USAF, Top Secret 1964-69
University of Colorado at Boulder 1972, CU School of Medicine '75, '77, '83
Critical Care Fellowship
Past Division Chairman, Anesthesiology, Cook County Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
Past Chairman, Respiratory Therapy, Cook County Hospital, Chicago
Diplomate ABA
Mensa
Sigma Xi, The Professional Science Research Society
PO Box 6939
Denver, CO 80206
USA

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

"weaponization of cybercrime and online conartist sociopathy- Novel Systems Theory,  Tragedy of the commons

excerpted-

     "When a  problem is developing  exponentially,  such  as  cybercrime,  it  is  because positive feedback is dominating the system. Exponential growth is limited by the capacity of  the system, and to regulate, slow, or reverse cybercrime’s growth, one must identify the positive feedback and then counter it with a negative feedback or terminate the positive  feedback completely.  The  problem’s  growth  may  be  with some department,  an organization,  and/or  society.  Systems  are like matryoshka  (nesting)  figures,  each  subsystem embeds and interacts with a larger system. This is why cybercrime and online conartist sociopathy require examination  through  the lens  of complexity  science. Developing any solution with an organization or  at a societal level  requires understanding how it works, why it works, and/or why it does not work

     "This research introduces the concept of weaponization of conscience as a complex system and tactic employed by conartists to camouflage their activity, coerce others, or to deceive their victims. weaponization of conscience can be used alone or in combination with other tactics such as  weaponization  of  bias  and  weaponization  of  silence  to  synergize  results  and  extend  their effectiveness. Additionally, weaponization of conscience can be employed against coerced victims to strengthen their attack against the victim. weaponization of conscience is any complex subsystem  with  the  larger  complex  system  of  social  persuasion.  This  article contributes to the developing discourse on theoretical features and the advancement of knowledge in cybercrime and online fraud detection from a System Dynamics perspective. Hardin’s  seminal  article  on  the  Tragedy  of  the  Commons  posits  that  to  appeal  to  an individual’s conscience is to intentionally opt for the extinction of all conscience in the long run (Hardin,  1968).  

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 "The principal concern of Hardin's essay was overpopulation of the planet.
Some scholars have argued that over-exploitation of the common resource is by no means inevitable, since the individuals concerned may be able to achieve mutual restraint by consensus. Others have contended that the metaphor is inapposite because its exemplar – unfettered access to common land – did not exist previously, the right to exploit common land being controlled by law. The work of Elinor Ostrom, who received the Nobel Prize is seen by some as having refuted Hardin's conclusions. Hardin's views on over-population, along with those of writers like ehrlich have been criticised as simplistic.

Tragedy of the Commons
"The metaphorical term is the title of a 1968 essay by ecologist Garrett Hardin. The concept itself did not originate with Hardin, but rather extends back to classical antiquity, being discussed by Aristotle."

Hardin  refers  to  the  conscience  as  pathogenic  and  likens  the  conjuring  of conscience to using a biological weapon. Hardin’s arguments are from Darwin’s (19th century) theory on survival of the fittest, which posits that organisms best adjusted to their environment  are the most  successful.  Put  simply,  to  act  with  empathy,  compassion, altruism  is  to  sentence  oneself  to  demise at the world  of  barbarians.  But  without  empathy  and compassion  for  one  another,  what  more  are  we  but  barbarians-  Defending  against  the weaponization  of  conscience,  requires  strikes on  the  balance  between  self-aware and compassion or pro-social behaviors.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"METHOD
This study adopts a conceptual approach, drawing from the theoretical underpinnings of military propaganda and psychological operations doctrines and adapting them to serve as a lens through  which  to  understand  and  conceptualize  how  cognitive  strategies,  specifically  the weaponization  of  conscience,  is  employed  by  conartists, &c who camouflage  their  activities  and deceiving victims.

"CONSCIENCE LAWS
The development of conscience laws in the United States reflects a complex relationship between legal,  ethical,  and  religious  considerations. Conscience laws, often  referred  to  as  conscience clauses  or  accommodation  laws,  are  designed  to  protect  individuals  and  entities  from  being compelled to participate in activities that conflict with their deeply held moral or religious beliefs. In summary, the progression of conscience laws in the U.S. reflects a  dynamic  evolution,  driven by changing societal values,  legal  interpretations, and  ongoing  debates about the  balance  between religious freedom and  the rights of individuals. The purpose behind adding references to conscience laws within  this  theory adaptation is  to  underscore the notion that conscience transcends mere philosophical abstraction. By grounding the discussion on conscience as defined in within a legal context, we can focus on the details of the theory. For this framework, conscience is defined  as an intrinsic motivational force guided by a person’s moral beliefs. Those moral beliefs may or may not be based on religion, since each person’s moral beliefs could evolve, etc. Moral beliefs or decisions could also be situational or relative. One need only ponder a variant of the trolley problem to realize how moral dilemmas can scramble our understanding of decision-theory

PSYOPS
Propaganda and  other  variants  of  psychological manipulation  have  been used  since  the dawn of time. The US Department of Defense updated its  doctrine on psychological operations and clarified that the purpose of PSYOPS is to convey selected information, indicators to foreign audiences to influence their emotions, motives, objective reasoning, and ultimately the behavior of  foreign  governments,  organizations,  groups,  and  individuals  favorable  to  the  originator’s

CONSCIENCE LAWS
The development of conscience laws in the United States reflects a complex balance between legal,  ethical,  and  religious  considerations.  Conscience  laws,  often  referred  to  as  conscience clauses  or  accommodation  laws,  are  designed  to  protect  individuals  and  entities  from  being compelled to participate in activities that conflict with their deeply held moral or religious beliefs. In summary, the development of conscience laws in the U.S. reflects a  dynamic  evolution,  driven by changing societal values,  legal  interpretations, and  ongoing  debates about the  balance  between religious freedom and  the rights of individuals (Health and Human Services Department,  2024; Office for Civil Rights (OCR), 2010) . The purpose of adding references to conscience laws with  this  theory adaptation is  to  underscore the notion  that  conscience transcends mere philosophical abstraction. By grounding the discussion on conscience as defined in legal context, we could focus on the details of the theory.

     "Hardin’s argument that the conscience weakens humanity might be true, but  we must develop defenses against the weaponization of conscience. Missing conscience, humanity couldn't survive 

(APPARENTLY THAT IS THE FINAL OPINION OF THIS ARTICLE, MARCH 2024, BUT POSSIBLY THE WORSE CASE SCENARIO IS WHEN THE CULTURE WHICH DOESN'T HAVE OR VALUE CONSCIENCE, ATTEMPTS TO OVERTAKE THE SOCIETY THAT DOES)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      Determining what is illegal, immoral, unethical or worse has varying opinions-
the impression is that-

     Principles ( possibly considered by some as determined by specific groups, &c ) ie, boundary conditions, determine Philosophy
     Apparently, when the Western Civilization Countries transitioned from paganism to Christianity, several methods had developed for the differences    

     Philosophy (some might say things such as Pledge of Allegiance to this Country, etc) drives details of important prospective daily decisions

     Details- daily decisions often depend upon Management Style

     Apparently, the Ad Hoc type of management style is aka "Adhocracy is a flexible, adaptable, and informal form of organization defined by a lack of formal structure and employs specialized multidisciplinary teams grouped by function. It operates in the fashion opposite to bureaucracy."

     Transactional management style is described as somewhat different

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
Mr Pug Chihuahua Auditory Service Animal needs Protection.jpg
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages