Atto Disk Benchmark Free Download
Marion Gwilt
From the world's leading provider of high-performance storage & network connectivity products, ATTO Disk Benchmark for Windows is the tool that top drive manufacturers use to build and test drives, IT professionals use to maintain IT ecosystems, and leading hardware review sites include in benchmark suites.
From the world's leading provider of high-performance storage & network connectivity products, ATTO Disk Benchmark for macOS is the tool that top drive manufacturers use to build and test drives, IT professionals use to maintain IT ecosystems, and leading hardware review sites include in benchmark suites.
ATTO Disk Benchmark is a handy harddisk and SSD benchmarking tool.Several options are available to customize your performance measurement including queue depth, overlapped I/O and even a comparison mode with the option to run continuously. Use ATTO Disk Benchmark to test any manufacturers RAID controllers, storage controllers, host adapters, hard drives and SSD drives and notice that ATTO products will consistently provide the highest level of performance to your storage. Features: Transfer sizes from 512KB to 8MB Transfer lengths from 64KB to 2GB Support for overlapped I/O Supports a variety of queue depths I/O comparisons with various test patterns Timed mode allows continuous testing Non-destructive performance measurement on formatted drives.
The first ATTO product was the SiliconDisk, a SCSI-based solid-state disk, released in 1989. The company received its first OEM contract with Kodak shortly thereafter, in 1990.[3] In 1992, ATTO introduced the ISA, EISA and MicroChannel (MCA) host bus adapters for the PC market at the Comdex trade show. By 1995, ATTO added to its product line yet again with the introduction of the ExpressPCI SCSI-3 Accelerator, which received the MacUsers Editor's Choice award that year.[4]
The ATTO Disk Benchmark is a utility provided by Attotech. It is used to measure the maximum speeds at which data can be transferred to and from a disk. The results are calculated by reading and writing blocks of data to a drive and timing how long each operation takes. Various tests are typically run, creating a transfer speed profile that shows both read and write transfer rates in megabytes per second for each user specified data block size. The results are displayed on an easy to read graph. Attotech provide the utility free of charge (available at the below download link).
A fio benchmark that performs 60 seconds of sequential write at QD4 on the first 10GB of the drive shows the difference in behavior in writing all 0s and all 1s. Drives affected by the data loss bug are shown below, with both their original firmware and updated data loss fix firmware.
ATTO Disk Benchmark is the quickest and simplest method to determine transfer speeds and utilizes the same test methodology as manufacturers in arriving at performance results. It simply measures raw sequential transfer speeds for both read and write access at various transfer sizes, producing a very easily understood result. This benchmark is by far the industry standard for spot-on raw sequential throughput.
ATTO Disk Benchmark is perhaps one of the oldest benchmarks going and is definitely the main staple for manufacturer performance specifications. ATTO uses RAW or compressible data and, for our benchmarks, we use a set length of 256mb and test both the read and write performance of various transfer sizes ranging from 0.5 to 8192kb. Manufacturers prefer this method of testing as it deals with raw (compressible) data rather than random (includes incompressible data) which, although more realistic, results in lower performance results.
The 4k random results write of 84MB/s are excellent as this disk access method is primarily responsible for the visible upgrade that we see when migrating from a hard drive to SSD. Typically, Crystal Diskmark results always tend to be a bit lower than those shown with ATTO Disk Benchmark.
You may not see this for long (and its definitely not common) but you get a freebee simply for reading! Over the last little while, we have been assisting with beta testing new benchmark software called Anvil Storage Utilities which is an absolutely amazing SSD benchmarking utility. Not only does it have a preset SSD benchmark, but also, it has included such things as endurance testing and threaded I/O read, write and mixed tests, all of which are very simple to understand and utilize in our benchmark testing. Recently, we published the exclusive public release here and, if you happen to check it out, there is a FREE download of the software! Lets see how the Future Storage 240GB SSD fares on the Anvil Pro:
The thing that stands out in these results has to be the random 4K write disk access at QD 16 which displays a high of 83,493 IOPS. This is significantly higher than the advertised high of 60,000 IOPS and the result of SandForces newly updated firmware. Overall, the results we have seen in all three synthetic benchmarks have been consistent and the mark of an upper tier SSD.
I was having a really hard time getting any benchmark to run on Windows 95 (RTM version, oldest). Roadkill's disk benchmark, HD tach, SiSoft Sandra 99 and 01 all crash with various DLL or page fault errors. The only thing that worked for me was SiSoft Sandra 98 (somewhat hard to find. Found it on this cd, direct download from inside the ISO here (filename SiSandra.exe). Install it and choose "Drives benchmark".
Hello,
im searching for some reliable Win98 storage benchmark, i have problem to find something, i used Atto benchmark, but its reports bad results - i dunno because of cache or used controllers or HDD, but it reports up to 1 GB/s on Sata II.. or just because it is bugged, or i have old version.. what is not sense.
Phil is usually good place.. but not for this.. there is 2x same Road Kill - and i tried it few days ago with real Socket 7 machines + 40 GB IDE Seagate, UDMA 33 were enabled and it really report other number in every run.. with growing size of data block im getting few normal results.. after that one results is very bad lesser than smaller blocks (17 MB/s vs. 1 MB/s or something else).. and after that again normal results.. Usually 2/3 rows are just nonsense and which ones its different in every run..
Atto benchmark also reporting very strange numbers for memory card adapters - too high, some for SSD on Sata.
Is anyone using NetApp for CommVault disk library, we just replaced the HP MSA2050 with NetApp FAS2720, this is 72 SATA 14.5 disk enclosure. The write performance is great but read is supper slow. The Aux copy is very slow for SQL DB backup and Exchange. I run Validate Storage on 1 path, all backup and aux was disabled, that is the max read of 31 MB/Sec
For write performance, I suspect that the writes are sent through the FAS cache, so of course performance is better than on commvault usage, while you would have to read from the spindle disks themselves and not the cache.
Also if possible try to have not an iSCSI volume but some NFS/SMB test volume created, mount it locally and re-run the performance tests (even using ATTO benchmark) to see if it could be protocol-related.
To test the performance of ADATA's SX8200 Pro SSD, I ran a series of benchmarks using CrystalDiskMark, HD Tach RW, ATTO Disk Benchmark, AS SSD, HD Tune Pro, Anvil's Storage Utilities, Iometer and PCMark 8. For comparison, I've also included test results from the Crucial P1, ADATA XPG SX8200, Western Digital WD Black NVMe, Samsung 970 EVO, Samsung 970 PRO, Plextor M9Pe, Plextor M8Se, Patriot Hellfire, ADATA XPG SX8000, Samsung 960 PRO, Toshiba OCZ RD400, Samsung 950 PRO, Samsung 860 QVO, Samsung 860 PRO, Crucial MX500, Plextor M8V, Samsung T5, Crucial BX300, ADATA Ultimate SU900, Plextor S3C, Toshiba OCZ VX500, ADATA Ultimate SU800, Plextor S2C and Crucial MX300.
First, I ran a few quick tests using CrystalDiskMark. This benchmark tool measures the performance of a storage device by testing its sequential read and write speeds as well as its random read and write speeds using blocks 512K and 4K in size.
We hebben de Orico Portable SSD getest met ons standaard ssd-testsysteem, gebaseerd op een X570-moederbord en Ryzen 7 3700X-processor. Daarbij testen we de drives onder Windows 10, met de externe ssd in een USB-poort achterop het moederbord geprikt. We draaien enkele synthetische benchmarks en kijken daarnaast ook naar de praktijk. Om bottlenecks van onze systeemdrive uit te sluiten, maken we voor de praktijktests gebruik van een ramdrive van 120GB als bron- en doeldrive.
Allereerst doen we enkele synthetische benchmarks (AS SSD en Atto Disk Benchmark) om specifieke prestatie-eigenschappen van de SSD's te achterhalen. Belangrijker zijn de real world benchmarks, gebaseerd op het schijfgebruik van échte applicaties. Hiervoor maken we gebruik van de diverse storage-benchmarks als onderdeel van PCMark8, als ook een drietal eigen workloads. Met behulp van de PCMark8 test bepalen we ook de prestaties van schijven na langdurige belasting. Op basis van de verschillende real world benchmarks bepalen we de Hardware.Info SSD Prestatiescore 2018 en de Hardware.Info SSD Entry Prestatiescore 2018, waarbij we het gemiddelde prestatieniveau vangen in één getal.
df19127ead