The general, not-very-helpful answer is that the two runners contain
different code. :-) The execution code will be unified in the nunit engine
under NUnit 3.0. Of course, that only means they will both do the
same thing - they could still both fail.
I suggest you start by debugging into your test and figuring out exactly
what it is that's unexpectedly null and where it comes from. NUnit could
still be the culprit, but we have to start where the error is found.
Charlie
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NUnit-Discuss" group.
> To post to this group, send email to nunit-...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to nunit-discus...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nunit-discuss?hl=en.
>
For a failed test, you should see the failure in the Errors and
Failures tab and it should also be indicated on the test properties
display, accessible through the context menu. Please check both
places.
This way we can figure out if it's a known bug or something new.
Charlie
> To post to this group, send email to nunit-...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to nunit-discus...@googlegroups.com.
Note that I asked Mike for more info in February but there has been
no reply. So I'll pass the request to you. :-)
Can you debug into this and find out exactly what is failing in the
Gui but working in the console? That's really the only way we can
start looking into it.
Charlie
Do the failing tests have anything in common? Do the errors?
Can you replicate this with an example?
Failing that, let's pick a test and look at it in detail.
Charlie