[Numpy-discussion] label NA and datetime as experimental

[Ralf Gommers]

Hi,

We decided to label both NA and datetime APIs as experimental for the 1.7.0 release. I made a PR that does this, please review: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/240

Ralf

[Richard Hattersley]

Hi,

My team are currently experimenting with extending datetime to allow
alternative, non-physical calendars (e.g. 360-day used by climate
modellers). Once we've got a handle on the options we'd like to
propose the extensions/changes back to NumPy. Obviously we'd like to
avoid wasted effort, so are there some aspects of datetime64 which are
more experimental than others? Is there a summary of unresolved issues
and/or plans for change?

Thanks,
Richard Hattersley

> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Di...@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Di...@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion