Fwd: OPED in Honolulu Star Advertiser by VFP friend Lynda Williams--Invest in existing clean energy solutions, not nuclear fantasy

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Ellen Thomas

unread,
Oct 30, 2025, 8:15:58 PM (8 days ago) Oct 30
to NucNews



-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [VFP NoNukes] OPED in Honolulu Star Advertiser by VFP friend Lynda Williams--Invest in existing clean energy solutions, not nuclear fantasy
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 10:17:58 -1000
From: ann Wright <annw...@gmail.com>
To: VFP No Nukes <vfp-n...@googlegroups.com>
CC: Lynda Williams <lynda...@gmail.com>


Invest in existing clean energy solutions, not nuclear fantasy

By Lynda Williams

In the last legislative session, Hawaii lawmakers approved Senate Concurrent Resolution 136, directing the Hawaii State Energy Office (HSEO) to convene a Nuclear Energy Working Group to study whether “advanced” nuclear power could help meet the state’s 100% renewable energy goal.

I serve on the working group as a physicist representing the environmental organization 350 Hawai‘ i. Other members include representatives from HSEO, the departments of Health and of Land and Natural Resources, the state Public Utilities Commission, and the University of Hawaii, along with invited members from the U.S. Navy, nuclear-power lobby groups and environmental groups. No kanaka maoli-led organizations such as the Office of Hawaiian Affairs or KAHEA were included — a serious oversight in any discussion of Hawaii’s energy future. The following reflects my response to the working group survey on feasibility, safety and policy issues.

Nuclear power is not feasible in Hawaii because it faces insurmountable legal and technical barriers. Article XI, Section 8 of the Hawaii State Constitution prohibits the construction or operation of any nuclear-fission reactor without a twothirds vote of each house of the state Legislature — an exceptionally high bar without sweeping political change.

Hawaii law also defines renewable energy as sources that are naturally replenished, such as solar, wind, ocean and geothermal — not technologies dependent on mining that produce radioactive waste. By legal definition, nuclear power cannot contribute to meeting the state’s renewable energy goals, unless the law is changed.

Technical barriers are even higher. Despite growing hype around so-called “advanced” nuclear reactors, in reality, there are no operating “advanced” reactors anywhere in the world, no reliable timeline for when any might come online, and a decades- long record of cost overruns, cancellations and failed promises. Every design being promoted — from small modular reactors (SMRs) to molten-salt and thorium systems — is still a nuclear reactor that splits uranium atoms, generates radioactive waste and requires extensive cooling, shielding and waste-management infrastructure.

At our first meeting in September, there was discussion of whether Hawaii’s constitutional requirement for a two-thirds legislative vote to approve the construction of any nuclear-fission plant could somehow be avoided. That notion reflects a deep confusion driving this conversation: that “advanced” nuclear systems are fundamentally different from the fission reactors banned under Article XI. They are not.

Some advocates suggested that small “plug-and-play” SMRs could be shipped to Hawaii, used briefly, and sent back to the continent — a concept that exists only in fantasy. Any nuclear reactor unit requires installation, grid connection and refueling — all of which constitute the operation of a nuclear-fission facility under Hawaii’s Constitution. The first draft of HSEO’s report is due Nov. 5, with a final version to be submitted to the Legislature by the end of the year — a challenging timeline for such a complex report. How can anyone produce a thorough feasibility analysis — including cost, safety and environmental assessments — for a technology that doesn’t even exist? Even HSEO warned lawmakers in its testimony against this resolution that “given the current lack of cost, production, safety, and nuclear waste-management information on SMRs, the formation of a nuclear energy task force is premature.”

Hawaii’s path forward in clean energy lies not in nuclear fantasies but in strengthening the law protecting Hawaii from nuclear waste and investing in what already works — solar and wind — and in exploring tidal and ocean-energy resources to achieve clean, safe and independent power generation.

———

MORE ONLINE:

For my full responses with citations to the Nuclear Energy Working Group survey, visit nuclearfreehawaii. substack.com.

ISLAND VOICES

Lynda Williams, a physicist and Hilo resident, serves on Hawaii’s Nuclear Energy Working Group; the views here are her own.


--


Ann Wright
Dissent: Voices of Conscience
--


Virus-free.www.avg.com
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages