Why the US decided to
normalize relations with Belarus
Washington Restarts
Direct Contacts with Moscow's Ally, and Minsk Has
Nothing Against It
Gleb Mishutin
Ilya Lakstygal
White House spokesman
John Cole visited Belarus and de facto moved relations
between the two countries to a new stage of
development
White House spokesman
John Cole visited Belarus and de facto moved relations
between the two countries to a new stage of
development / Press service of the President of
Belarus
The United States
intends to open an embassy in Minsk and fully
normalize relations with Belarus. This was stated on
September 11 following a meeting with the President of
the Republic Alexander Lukashenko by John Cole, Deputy
Special Representative of the United States Keith
Kellogg, BelTA reports. The US Embassy in the
Belarusian capital has not actually been operating
since February 2022, the consular section does not
issue visas, but the building remains under
appropriate protection.
According to Cole, the
return of the embassy to Minsk is a matter of the near
future. The meeting with Lukashenko, according to the
American, was productive, and the strengthening of
economic and political cooperation was discussed. "The
presidents of Belarus and the United States are
leaders who are doing everything to normalize our
relations and focus not on differences, but on common
points," he emphasized.
According to BelTA,
the main goal of Cole's visit was to announce the
lifting of sanctions against the Belarusian airline
Belavia. Cole acknowledged that the remaining
restrictive measures would be discussed at further
negotiations. The decision to lift sanctions against
Belavia has already been made by the US State
Department, the US Department of Commerce and the
Treasury and has already been officially approved,
including on Trump's personal initiative. Footage of
Cole stating this was published by the Telegram
channel Pool of the First. As of 17:00 Moscow time,
however, Belavia continued to be listed on the
sanctions lists of OFAC, the US Treasury Department's
Office of Foreign Assets Control, which is responsible
for the restrictions.
As Cole, who also
serves as Deputy Assistant to President Donald Trump ,
noted, relations between Washington and Minsk are now
"good, but not great", and there is potential for
improvement. The White House representative also noted
that there may be disagreements between the countries,
but "they should not be brought to the surface".
According to Cole, Trump is ready for the final
normalization of bilateral relations.
US lifts sanctions on
Belavia airline
Politics /
International news
The United States
imposed sectoral restrictions on Belarus in 2021 in
connection with the violent suppression of protests in
2020, when Alexander Lukashenko officially won the
presidential election again . The restrictions were
strengthened in 2021, when an incident occurred with a
Ryanair plane: the plane was forcibly landed at Minsk
airport, and opposition blogger Roman Protasevich, who
was flying on it, was detained by Belarusian
authorities. The US added Belavia to the sanctions
list in 2023 under the presidency of Democrat Joe
Biden.
Cole also handed
Lukashenko a letter from Trump, in which the American
president congratulated his Belarusian counterpart on
his birthday (it was August 30 – Vedomosti), wished
him health, well-being and expressed confidence in
further joint constructive work. Trump also gave
Lukashenko a gift – cufflinks with an image of the
White House. In response, Lukashenko said that he
“will not remain in debt,” BelTA quotes him as saying.
The release of
Belarusian prisoners turned out to be timed to
coincide with Cole's visit to Belarus; this topic was
also raised during his talks with Lukashenko.
Lithuanian President Gitanas Nauseda reported on the
social network X that Minsk had released 52 political
prisoners, as Trump called them. According to Nauseda,
they include opposition figures, protesters, including
citizens of foreign countries (six from Lithuania). In
addition to Lithuanians, citizens of Great Britain,
Germany, France, Poland and Latvia were in Belarusian
prisons and have now been released. According to
Nauseda, all 52 people have already crossed the
Belarusian-Lithuanian border.
Causes, motives and
context of the "warming"
Cole's current visit
is not the first trip of US representatives to Belarus
in 2025. In June, Kellogg, who specializes in contacts
with the EU and Kiev in the context of the Ukrainian
settlement, visited Minsk in his company. As Reuters
reported, that visit could be seen as a step
accelerating the start of peace talks to end the
Ukrainian conflict. As a result of those talks, a
group of 14 Belarusian prisoners was released,
including Sergei Tikhanovsky, an opposition blogger
and husband of former Belarusian presidential
candidate in the 2020 elections Svetlana
Tikhanovskaya.
Leading researcher at
the Institute of International Studies (IIS) of MGIMO
Nikolai Silaev believes that the conditional "warming"
of relations between the US and Belarus is not
connected with the settlement in Ukraine. Potentially,
mediation will not be in demand until some detailed
agreements appear. "And, as is known, Trump himself
wants to be a mediator [on the conflict in Ukraine],
he does not need Lukashenko for this. And even the
Minsk agreements of 2014-2015 were not prepared by
Lukashenko - he emphasized that Minsk is just a
platform."
Trump is now trying to
reset relations with Belarus, implementing theses
proposed by relevant American experts, such as Mark
Episkopos from the Quincy Institute, notes ISKRAN
senior research fellow Pavel Koshkin.
It was not until the
spring of 2025 that Quincy’s representatives were in
Minsk, and in mid-June Episkopos published an article
in The National Interest titled “Can Belarus Be Turned
Around?” In it, the author promoted the idea that
improving relations between Washington and Minsk would
be beneficial “for security and stability in Eastern
Europe as the United States prioritizes Asia.” The
article argues that, in addition to efforts to resolve
Ukraine, the Trump team “needs to seize short-term
opportunities to advance U.S. interests” in the
region. And in it, “the biggest window is a potential
agreement to normalize U.S. relations with Belarus,
which plays a key role in relations between Russia and
the West,” and which can be called a “balcony” – a
bridgehead between Moscow and NATO. Episkopos calls
the West’s approach after the events of 2020
“autopilot” towards maximum tightening of pressure,
which has only led to “aggressive import substitution”
in Belarus and its “distancing from the West.”
Koshkin believes that
the US sees Belarus as an intermediary for
communication and influence on Russia due to
Lukashenko’s trusting relationship with Russian leader
Vladimir Putin. The Trump administration has obviously
found the current moment advantageous for exerting a
kind of “psychological pressure” on Russia, the
Americanist believes: “This is a chance to ‘mirror’
Moscow in ‘its backyard’, since it has tried to
strengthen its ties with Cuba and the countries of
South America – ‘the US backyard’.”
In the Eastern
European region, Belarus is an important country for
the United States, which borders Lithuania, Poland,
and Ukraine – three of their allies, Silaev notes.
According to him, the Americans made their first
“approach to the projectile” during Trump’s first
term, when former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo
visited Minsk. At that time, Silaev notes, the
interests of Washington and Minsk coincided:
Lukashenko was looking for ways to reduce his
dependence on Russia, while the Americans and
Europeans wanted to tear Belarus away from Russia.
“Lukashenko played this game until it became clear in
2020 that the West wanted to tear Belarus away from
Russia without Lukashenko in power. And now,
apparently, the United States is arguing that since
they failed to overthrow him, it would be good to get
closer – the costs are zero anyway, and Lukashenko
wants separate relations with the West, not in the
context of Russian policy,” Silaev explains.
At the same time,
Silaev believes that Moscow will not condemn Minsk for
meetings with US representatives, but will rather
publicly call this a sign of them overcoming “old
prejudices.” Russia will also welcome the lifting of
sanctions against Belarus, since it benefits from not
waging an economic war against an ally. “But Moscow
will be very careful to ensure that the Belarusian
authorities do not sabotage integration with Russia,”
Silaev notes.
In addition to such
pragmatic considerations, Koshkin also admits that
Trump’s “sporting” interest may be a motive for
“normalization” with Minsk: “He likes to show off that
he can find a common language with the “bad guys.”
It’s a peculiar way to assert himself and demonstrate
his masculinity.” Silaev agrees that “autocrats,” to
which Lukashenko is considered in the West, do not
bother Trump, and this is a new feature of American
foreign policy.