Tournament Director

[Leronne Washington]

Doyou need a commercial license? Click here if you are unsure. If you wish to use the Tournament Director software for commercial (or revenue generating) events you must purchase a commercial license.It's really simple: if you are using the Tournament Director software to generate revenue, directly or indirectly, you need a commercial license. If you are using the software for your personal enjoyment, you don't need a commercial license. An example of using the software to directly generate revenue: you are hosting a tournament that costs $50 to enter, $45 of which goes into the pot and $5 you keep. An example of using the software to indirectly generate revenue: you are hosting a free tournament at a bar or pub. (Revenue does not refer to money paid out from the pot of a tournament; this refers to money "raked" from a tournament, or a "vig", or other fees collected from participants, establishment, or other related entities.)Using a personal license when a commercial license is required is a violation of the licensing terms of the software, and a violation of US and international copyright law, and is subject to fines and penalties.If you have questions concerning licensing, please write to sa...@thetournamentdirector.net.

Commercial licensing terms A commercial license may be installed on a single computer only. If use of the software is needed on multiple computers, a separate and unique license for each computer must be purchased. (Exceptions can be made; please email sa...@thetournamentdirector.net with questions.)For detailed information concerning software versions and upgrades, please see Questions? Email sa...@thetournamentdirector.net.

Click a "Buy Now" button above to place an order. You will be taken to the Tournament Director license order page at PayPal. After completing the transaction, you will be returned to the Tournament Director website with some additional information regarding your order.

You are purchasing a license that is delivered via email. Please note that you are purchasing a license to use the software, which is delivered via email. The software is not sold on any physical media.

Please double-check your email address when you place your order. Your Tournament Director license will be delivered via email to the address you provide. Obviously, an incorrect email address will impede the delivery of your license.

Please allow 24 hours* for delivery. Most licenses are delivered the same day, usually within a few minutes or a few hours. This is not an automated system, however, and sometimes it may take longer to process your order. If necessary, delivery can sometimes be expedited. If you are in need of a faster delivery, email sa...@thetournamentdirector.net. Not every order can be expedited. Please only request if absolutely necessary.

FP: It seems inevitable there is going to be some contraction of the schedule. You come from the business world, you must understand the market forces involved. But how challenging is it to put all this effort into hosting a tournament under these circumstances?

Shortly after PGA Tour commissioner Jay Monahan met the press on Tuesday at the Players Championship, offering a rosy assessment of the state of play, my phone rang. The caller was someone I\u2019ve never met or even spoken with. He is the tournament director at an old, proud PGA Tour event and he wanted to vent. \u201CWith all the change happening at the Tour,\u201D he said, \u201Cthere is one side to the story that is not being told: ours. Monahan, Tiger, Rory, all the other top players\u2014they seem to have forgotten their biggest customer, which is the title sponsors of the tournaments. Honda, Dell Computers, Mayakoba\u2026 they\u2019re gone. If the Tour keeps losing big, longstanding sponsors, none of this other stuff matters because the business model is going to collapse. Those of us at the tournament level, we\u2019re on the front lines right now, trying to hold everything together.\u201D

Tournament director: I enjoyed Bay Hill as much as everybody else. It was a great show and I\u2019m happy for the Tour to have some wins. We\u2019re fine this season because everyone knows this schedule was thrown together as part of a very transitional year. The real concern is 2024 and beyond. Nobody knows what the future will look like. We remain hopeful, but there are still so many unanswered questions. The most frustrating part is that the Tour has done so little to engage with the title sponsors and the tournaments. The communication has been clunky and minimal at best. It\u2019s almost like a form of avoidance. They do the absolute minimum and that has led to a lot of animosity between the Tour and the sponsors, which is unbelievable to me. You would think they would be working overtime to make their corporate partners feel valued and get them to buy into this new vision they are trying to create.

TD: Very. We have been told nothing about how much the top 50 players will have to play non-designated events next year. [Ed. note: In 2023, top players must compete in three non-elevated events to collect their full Player Impact Program bonus.] The only information we get is from the public press releases and that language appears to have been stripped away now. Of course, we joke that\u2019ll probably change three or four more times based on which players complain. This is part of the frustration and animosity: None of this feels like a well laid-out plan. From the very beginning, the Tour has been reactionary all the way across the board. They\u2019re just making this stuff up by the seat of their pants.

TD: We had already been in conversations about reupping. In our mind it was a done deal coming out of last year, when we had a spectacular field. Now, it\u2019s how can we show them value? How can they justify a $15 million investment? And if they can\u2019t, candidly, how do we find someone else? It\u2019s getting harder to ask for more and more from the sponsor without having answers. If we knew that every third year we would be designated, that would calm a lot of nerves. When you lose starpower, it definitely hurts. It hurts more from a perception standpoint. Make no mistake, when no big names show up at a tournament, like Honda, the news media around non-designated events turns very negative. Casual fans take note and the perception becomes they are being sold an inferior product. All of our local golf fans have been pinched by inflation, and discretionary spending has never been tighter. Fans are asking why they should spend 50 or 60 or 70 bucks to watch a bunch of players they\u2019ve never heard of. Objectively, it\u2019s a valid question.

TD: When the news broke last summer and big names started leaving for LIV, multiple sponsors looked into how they could get out of their contracts. They felt they could do it since the product had been irrevocably harmed, but nobody wanted to be first. It would have been a lose-lose for everyone involved. It never happened, but that tells you what the mood has been like. There is more animosity now because it\u2019s become two tours. If you\u2019re not a designated event, there is a lot of stress and uncertainty about how you are going to keep, or find, a title sponsor. It all boils down to eyeballs for the sponsors: Am they getting what they signed up for? The ratings have been pretty staggering for non-elevated events, down 20 percent or more. I\u2019m curious what TV is going to feel like for non-designated events next year. How does NBC feel? They paid $1.3 billion for TV rights; now the Tour is switching up the game on them. If two-thirds of their events are shit fields, with nobody in the top 20, what incentive do they have to invest in the broadcast? We\u2019re asking them to spend a lot of money on a fringe sport, a regional sport. If they\u2019re not getting eyeballs, that is a huge problem.

TD: Over the last five to seven years, we have tried to turn our tournament into an event that people in our community want to be a part of. That takes a lot of energy and work and investment from the title sponsor, putting in extra capital besides what they are contractually obligated to do. We\u2019re doing everything we can. But ultimately golf fans want to see the best players. That\u2019s what is so frustrating about what is happening right now: These top guys are making sure they get paid, but what will this do to the long-term health of the Tour? They are creating a closed loop. That\u2019s great for the top guys, and a small number of tournaments, but what about the rest of us?

TD: Our tournament doesn\u2019t pay players. We just don\u2019t. Do some ask? Absolutely. A lot of the guys who used to ask have gone to LIV, but others are still on Tour. How do you think Travelers gets so many top guys to show up? That tournament is the king of appearance fees, though they call them personal service contracts or something like that. Bubba [Watson] went public with some of these details, but it\u2019s been going on for a long time, basically paying guys to show up at a cocktail party and things like that.

TD: It makes me sad because the Tour is choosing the winners and losers. Yes, in the past there had always been different tiers of tournaments based on how the schedule fell, but it wasn\u2019t official policy and you always felt like you could overcome it. Maybe you\u2019d give a sponsor\u2019s exemption to a kid and he\u2019d become a superstar and keep coming back year after year. Or maybe some top players would want to work on their game and add your event. But now we can\u2019t control our own destiny and that is frustrating. You can do everything right but one or two decisions in Ponte Vedra Beach, or even from Tiger and Rory, can change everything. And that has a big effect on how your tournament is viewed in your community and the charitable impact you can have. And for what? Just so the top guys can make more money, even though they were already making a ton of it. It\u2019s really sad.

3a8082e126