Re: Issue 8 in nsscache: [PATCH] add support for RFC2307BIS

[nssc...@googlecode.com]

Comment #4 on issue 8 by Heineken...@gmail.com: [PATCH] add support for
RFC2307BIS
https://code.google.com/p/nsscache/issues/detail?id=8

Do we have the patch for map passwd & shadow support for rfc2307bis

I appreciate all your recommendation for this case

Regards

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

[nssc...@googlecode.com]

Comment #5 on issue 8 by j...@spacepants.org: [PATCH] add support for
RFC2307BIS
https://code.google.com/p/nsscache/issues/detail?id=8

Issue 33 has been merged into this issue.

[nssc...@googlecode.com]

Comment #6 on issue 8 by j...@spacepants.org: [PATCH] add support for
RFC2307BIS
https://code.google.com/p/nsscache/issues/detail?id=8

The way this patch is constructed, the LDAP client code has hardcoded one
or another schema into it. This patch needs a way to choose between the
existing schema and the RFC2370bis schema; either a simple flag in the
config file, or something more generic (such as a way to dynamically set
the mapping from /etc/passwd fields to LDAP schema attribute names,
perhaps.)

[nssc...@googlecode.com]

Comment #7 on issue 8 by j...@spacepants.org: [PATCH] add support for
RFC2307BIS
https://code.google.com/p/nsscache/issues/detail?id=8

Noted that the patch does indeed enable it with the rfc2307bis config
option.

I've lagged ont his too long. Applying as supplied and we can iterate on it.

[nssc...@googlecode.com]

Comment #8 on issue 8 by j...@spacepants.org: [PATCH] add support for
RFC2307BIS
https://code.google.com/p/nsscache/issues/detail?id=8

Ok, fixed in github master.

[nssc...@googlecode.com]

Updates:
Status: Fixed

Comment #9 on issue 8 by j...@spacepants.org: [PATCH] add support for
RFC2307BIS
https://code.google.com/p/nsscache/issues/detail?id=8

(No comment was entered for this change.)