[NSL_KIT] Review comments from IEEE Internet of Things Journal

[Nguyen Bach Long]

Dear NSL members,

I forwarded the review comments from IEEE Internet of Things Journal. I hope you would gain ur experiences by reading my review comments.

Cheers,

==============================

Reviewer: 1 

Comments to the Author 
This paper presented a routing scheme to enhances energy comsumption and end-to-end delay for large-scale Industrial Internet of Things systems. The routing scheme was  compared with three other algorithms. The idea sounds interesting. However, the method still has some weaknesses. My detailed concerns include: 
section 1: 
- It would be better to highlight the main advantages of your method over others in a single paragraph. 
section 2: 
- It would be better to reorganize all the related work.  You may consider to classify the related work into several groups and each corresponds to a specific line of work. 
section 3: 
- In section A, when define router ri, "can reach an other....", it may be changed to "another". 
- In section C, What is  E(k) and E(k,d) in equations 1,2,3 stands for, please define them in table 1. 
section 5: 
- Fig.8 is too messy and hard to find out the topology,it should be simpler. 
- The symbols in fig.9 to fig.13 are hard to distinguish. It is much better to replace the symbols with other noticeable ones. 
-  In the sixth line at the second part of section C, the ERRS has been writen as EERS. It should be changed to ERRS. 
-  In the fifth line at the third part of section C, the ERRS has been writen as EERS. It should be changed to ERRS. 

Reviewer: 2

Please check the attachments.

==============================================

--

Nguyen Bach Long, M.Eng.,

Networked Systems Lab - NSL (D107),

Department of IT Convergence,

School of Electronics Engineering,

Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Korea.