Skip to first unread message
Cosmos
Dec 4, 2017, 12:58:24 AM12/4/17
to ns-3-users
Hello everyone,
I've set up a topology with 5 eNBs and a variable number of UEs. I'm trying to observe the throughput performance for different QCI categories. However, it remains the same, even when I use the CQA scheduler. I also applied the patch mentioned in this thread - (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/ns-3-users/$20Question$20regarding$20Dedicated$20Eps$20Bearer$20and$20handover$20%7Csort:date/ns-3-users/RvoYMP5uUso/zYaZj8noAgAJ).
Can someone help me figure this out? The EPS bearer can be modified in lines 404-405. The following line can be used for running the program:
./waf --run "scratch/lte-sample --nUE=40 --scheduler="ns3::CqaFfMacScheduler""
Thanks!
I've set up a topology with 5 eNBs and a variable number of UEs. I'm trying to observe the throughput performance for different QCI categories. However, it remains the same, even when I use the CQA scheduler. I also applied the patch mentioned in this thread - (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/ns-3-users/$20Question$20regarding$20Dedicated$20Eps$20Bearer$20and$20handover$20%7Csort:date/ns-3-users/RvoYMP5uUso/zYaZj8noAgAJ).
Can someone help me figure this out? The EPS bearer can be modified in lines 404-405. The following line can be used for running the program:
./waf --run "scratch/lte-sample --nUE=40 --scheduler="ns3::CqaFfMacScheduler""
Thanks!
Tommaso Pecorella
Dec 4, 2017, 4:44:19 PM12/4/17
to ns-3-users
The scheduler will just prioritize who gets their RBs first, but if there's no congestion, the throughput will be the same no matter what is the bearer class.
Moreover, if all the UEs use the very same bearer type, they'll all compete evenly.
Logic...
T.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages