Comparision between sheduling techniques in LTE

[Sami Jaballah]

Hi guys,

Could you please help me to understand the following issue:

I have created a simple LTE scenario for video streaming.
The network topology is : single cell with 10 UEs
 Based on the Evalvid script i have  installed a client application for each UE (10 Client applications ) and 10 server applications. 

So when I tried to change the scheduling algorithm, I can't figure out why every tested scheduling algorithm provides the same result (Packet Loss Ratio for example) ?!
Please find attached the code.

Best.

[Biljana Bojović]

You are testing here only uplink? In uplink all schedulers have the same behavior.

Biljana

[Sami Jaballah]

Thanks for  the reply,

No in this code i try to simulate a video streaming application "remote host to UEs" (downlink)
  

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "ns-3-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ns-3-users/T_NPHOnaTSw/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to ns-3-users+...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to ns-3-...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ns-3-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--

Sami Jaballah

Ph.D Researcher in telecommunication
Innov'COM Research laboratory@Sup'Com
Higher School of Communication of Tunis, City of Communications Technologies 
2083 El Ghazala Ariana Tunisia
@mail : sami.jab...@ieee.org
Tel: (+216) 53 152191

[Konstantinos]

Personally I do not think that there will be any significant difference in PDR among the schedulers, particularly with low load (only 10 users). I do not know what is the load of each user but the cell capacity is the same in all scenarios.

Their difference is mainly in terms of throughput, delay (or delay distribution) or when the load increases (more users, more requested load)..

On Thursday, March 26, 2015 at 2:22:28 PM UTC, Sami Jaballah wrote:

Thanks for  the reply,

No in this code i try to simulate a video streaming application "remote host to UEs" (downlink)
  

2015-03-26 9:39 GMT+01:00 Biljana Bojović <biljana...@gmail.com>:

You are testing here only uplink? In uplink all schedulers have the same behavior.

Biljana

On Wednesday, March 25, 2015 at 6:25:32 PM UTC+1, Sami Jaballah wrote:

Hi guys,

Could you please help me to understand the following issue:

I have created a simple LTE scenario for video streaming.
The network topology is : single cell with 10 UEs
 Based on the Evalvid script i have  installed a client application for each UE (10 Client applications ) and 10 server applications. 

So when I tried to change the scheduling algorithm, I can't figure out why every tested scheduling algorithm provides the same result (Packet Loss Ratio for example) ?!
Please find attached the code.

Best.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "ns-3-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ns-3-users/T_NPHOnaTSw/unsubscribe.

To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to ns-3-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to ns-3-...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ns-3-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[Boopala Krishnan]

Hi,

     The comparison has already been done in this paper. Refer this... 

http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=7057250&punumber%3D7050733%26filter%3DAND%28p_IS_Number%3A7057217%29%26pageNumber%3D2

On Thursday, March 26, 2015 at 7:57:39 PM UTC+5:30, Konstantinos wrote:

Personally I do not think that there will be any significant difference in PDR among the schedulers, particularly with low load (only 10 users). I do not know what is the load of each user but the cell capacity is the same in all scenarios.

Their difference is mainly in terms of throughput, delay (or delay distribution) or when the load increases (more users, more requested load)..

On Thursday, March 26, 2015 at 2:22:28 PM UTC, Sami Jaballah wrote:

Thanks for  the reply,

No in this code i try to simulate a video streaming application "remote host to UEs" (downlink)
  

2015-03-26 9:39 GMT+01:00 Biljana Bojović <biljana...@gmail.com>:

You are testing here only uplink? In uplink all schedulers have the same behavior.

Biljana

On Wednesday, March 25, 2015 at 6:25:32 PM UTC+1, Sami Jaballah wrote:

Hi guys,

Could you please help me to understand the following issue:

I have created a simple LTE scenario for video streaming.
The network topology is : single cell with 10 UEs
 Based on the Evalvid script i have  installed a client application for each UE (10 Client applications ) and 10 server applications. 

So when I tried to change the scheduling algorithm, I can't figure out why every tested scheduling algorithm provides the same result (Packet Loss Ratio for example) ?!
Please find attached the code.

Best.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "ns-3-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ns-3-users/T_NPHOnaTSw/unsubscribe.

To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to ns-3-users+...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to ns-3-...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ns-3-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.