Git vs. Hg vs. Subversion

Jeremy Wadsack

unread,

Nov 12, 2011, 2:27:10 PM11/12/11

to npr-a...@googlegroups.com

About a year and a half ago, there was a request in the issue tracker to move the source control to Mercurial (Hg). At the time I preferred Hg but have been using Git almost exclusively for the past year and have gotten pretty comfortable with it. More to the point, I much prefer using git for handling feature branching, local branches, and pull request rather than the subversion branch-per-release process.

Google Code now supports Git. What does everyone think about switching over to git for source control

--
Jeremy Wadsack

Jeffrey Ollie

unread,

Nov 13, 2011, 7:13:10 PM11/13/11

to npr-a...@googlegroups.com

On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Jeremy Wadsack
<jeremy....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Google Code now supports Git. What does everyone think about switching over
> to git for source control

+1 from me!

--
Jeff Ollie

Justin Friberg

unread,

Nov 14, 2011, 12:03:15 AM11/14/11

to npr-a...@googlegroups.com

I'm definitely for the switch to Git. It's certainly a better choice for this kind of project in my mind. I'm also happy to take on the technical task of moving the project if needed.

Justin Friberg

Reply all

Reply to author

Forward