Strictly Reptiles Price List Pdf Download
Latrisha Adan
This principle is actually true for both local pet stores that have cheap reptiles for sale near you and cheap reptiles for sale online. The reason behind this is a store that promotes low-cost reptiles generally is more concerned with making money than the actual animals they care for.
Instead of focusing so much on the price of buying live reptiles, finding either online reptile breeders or live reptile pet stores that emphasize an animals-first policy will most likely save you money in the long-run. Reptiles, like any animal, need to be properly cared for wherever they are kept to prevent diseases and health problems from happening.
A wholesale reptiles supplier, unlike a cheap reptile store, is designed to care for a large number of live animals, including reptiles, snakes, lizards, turtles, and even exotic animals. This means setting up a full-size facility that is certified by the USDA to ensure the health and well-being of the many animals they house.
This is a preferred option for animal lovers interested in a purchasing a new pet and is the likely root taken by those same local pet stores (and even many smaller online reptile stores). Buying live reptiles from a wholesale reptiles store are also much more likely to be shipped properly as their entire franchise is made by doing so successfully.
Strictly Reptiles is one of such online reptile stores that puts the safety and health of our creatures first. This is a guaranteed promise that we make to each and every one of our buyers, along with the warranty options to back it up.
Strictly Reptiles is the #1 online supplier of the best wholesale reptile selection and other exotic animals as well! We primarily work in wholesale reptile sales, as this is the best business model to benefit both us and our primary Customers. We provide this variety of reptiles and other animals at amazing wholesale prices that allow our clients such as breeders, caretakers, and resellers to purchase many animals at once at a price much better per animal than standard retail. Of course, we also have a storefront and our entire Variety of Reptiles is available for individual retail sale as well inside. However, we wanted to share more with you about our wholesale options!
The savings acquired by purchasing wholesale can open doors for other purchase and sales opportunities. Spending less per animal means that you can order more at once while making a large profit per sale. The overhead might free you up to be able to make larger purchases, or purchase a wider variety of reptiles, or both! Expanding your business is usually a great plan! When you buy wholesale rather than retail, another area in which you save big is shipping. Even if the singular cost of shipping a bulk order is more than a small one, all those smaller shipping costs ad up to way more than just ordering once every so often. Now, say your business is the kind that supplies many exotic animals. Whether you are an enthusiast, a big or small zoo, museum, wildlife sanctuary, a pet store, or a breeder, Strictly Reptiles is without a doubt your number one resource for your wholesale needs. We have a wide variety of reptiles and other types of animals like amphibians, insects, and arachnids too!
Strictly Reptiles Inc ships priority overnight door-to-door service for weekday arrival. Saturday delivery service is also available for an additional charge. We answer our telephones six days a week, and those who work at our facility are the same people who pack your order, so you can be assured that the same quality customer service you receive over the phone is the same to pack up and ship your order. We have over 30 years of experience in the reptile business and care deeply about the animals we have here. Call us six days a week with any questions at 954-967-8310.
LinkedIn and 3rd parties use essential and non-essential cookies to provide, secure, analyze and improve our Services, and to show you relevant ads (including professional and job ads) on and off LinkedIn. Learn more in our Cookie Policy.
In my previous Post ("The Future of Water Meters is (probably) Solid State....") I looked at why solid state was believed to be the future but did not really explore what that future is likely to be, nor to challenge it in any way.
No mention of consumption metering where accuracy (repeatability) is usually far less important than linearity. This packages the features more conveniently for assimilation by the reptile brain and provides less potential for the logical brain to interfere nor establish a decent foundation into which to receive new ideas.
It implies the ultimate desirable solution.
What it actually offers is better performance than mechanical meters and it cannot promise any significant continued performance improvements though it might offer some future cost reductions. But in reality solid state is a new compromise. It is not simply a compromise between what the market currently enjoys and what it needs as a step on the road to the future, it means that if Solid State is the future then the market must accept that what it wants and once thought it might have cannot be.
So what does the market need? Certainly we can assume it will always want better performance at lower costs. Maybe solid state can offer some of that. This too is a connotation of the modern world view of the future, our perception that technology is always delivering better quality, more features, better performance and lower costs. But if there is a specific target performance, then that is what we should measure against and not simply compare to what we can already deliver and claim simply to be doing better.
This map helps us visualise the development history. Each significant advance creates a new cost/benefit curve and meters that were once successful, however briefly, are then lost in the encroaching junk yard.
The Nash designs of the volumetric meters, rotary piston and nutating disc meters, finally exclude the other technologies. But neither can be further improved.
It is also found that none of the hundreds of designs have delivered better cost benefit ratios and it is then assumed that no new better technologies can be found.
Both assumptions had lasted over 60 years to the point where it was then justifiable to consider that solid state might be the only way forward, if a cost/benefit advantage can be found.During the following decades during which solid state has finally matured, those assumptions have remained unchanged.
Success depends not exclusively on the performance, but on a balance of cost and performance. What the map shows is that solid state has established cost/benefit equivalence with the volumetric meters but not yet established a clear advantage. This is hoped to be achieved by the lower costs that are expected. Even so, it is unclear if this will allow solid state to take the major share of the market or make volumetric meters entirely obsolete. It seems that given no one manufacturer has established more than cost/benefit parity with volumetric meters nor better than cost/benefit parity with each other that solid state may be at or near the achievable performance limits.
What the map shows is that solid state cannot deliver the theoretical performance necessary to meet the market perfect product performance. But it also shows that PD meters did or do possess that potential. This leaves open a significant potential for competition from mechanical meters if either or both assumptions should break down.
The risk of one or other assumption failing is considered increasingly remote due to the lapse of time. However, though the passage of time may seem to have made them more and more like absolutes, they are and remain genuine risks. (If they are to be taken seriously there needs to be some "meat" to the risks; which "the elusive missing performance of volumetric meters" attempts to provide in the case of one assumption.)
What is also interesting is the degree to which mechanical meter advance needs to be made to upset the solid state future.
This is shown in this next map.
In this new map 7 represents the volumetric meters. They do not realistically show much potential for or from any further price reductions but it does show tremendous scope for performance improvement (12).
The assumption that the volumetric meters are mature is probably valid, if they are only ever capable of semi-positive displacement operation. However, if they can be transitioned from semi-positive to true positive displacement meters, the probability is that they will out-perform the solid state meters, including a significantly increased service life, and cost no more than now. Indeed, they may even prove to be the best of the PD meters.
Thus this is a very serious threat to solid state. Not simply a modest performance improvement that might subsequently be clawed back by solid state development, but one that might put the performance completely outside of the solid state potential. That such a transition is possible is not negated by the fact that no one has found such a solution in the 150 years or so since the Tylors rotary piston design first appeared. In all probability, once it was initially concluded that the designs could not be improved, no one has properly looked for this solution.
These are all pretty good reasons for rejection.
On the other hand, when someone suggests they actually have a solution, the reptile brain may not see the difference and impose the same response.
To be able to include the possibility of the assumptions failing and plan contingencies it was necessary to remind ourselves of how decisions are made, and more particularly, how they are influenced and it was necessary to show that rather than just an abstract idea, there is a solid foundation for the possibility that these assumptions might fail.
Should this also include the "disabiguation camp" that removes partial listings used as navigation aids and who remove list pages? Example: List of Carpenter named articles - nominated for deletion mainly because it duplicates Carpenter (disambiguation).
7fc3f7cf58