HARRY RICKER <kc...@yahoo.com>: Feb 04 02:09PM
David,
I think the MMX is a red herring. The Lorentz theory (and SR) is about changing the variables in Maxwell equations to make them invariant. Trying to explain MMX took him and Einstein on a wild
...more
|
|
|
r.j.an...@btinternet.com r.j.an...@btinternet.com <r.j.an...@btinternet.com>: Feb 04 02:30PM
David
>> The whole thing can be summed up like this. The maths comes first,
>> prior to any actual physical applications.<<
I think NOT in the case of Lorentz; he was supposed to be going
...more
|
|
|
r.j.an...@btinternet.com r.j.an...@btinternet.com <r.j.an...@btinternet.com>: Feb 04 02:32PM
add on: at the end of the day - mainstream says LTs deal with MMX, so I
don't see what your objections mean in that area.
------ Original Message ------
From: npa-rel...@googlegroups.com
...more
|
|
|
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Feb 04 02:40PM
Roger A.,
LT/LET deals with MMX in two mutually exclusive ways.
1) Length contraction + time-dilation due to interferometer motion through the aether. Einstein's Special relativity principle follows
...more
|
|
|
Viraj Fernando <vira...@yahoo.co.uk>: Feb 04 02:47PM
Hi Nick,I use Kaspersky. I got the following message:
Prevented downloading a dangerous object
Prevented downloading a malicious file or other object designed to infect your computer with
...more
|
|
|
r.j.an...@btinternet.com r.j.an...@btinternet.com <r.j.an...@btinternet.com>: Feb 04 02:54PM
>> both must fail.<<
that is false; for other experiments there are add-ons.
------ Original Message ------
From: ta...@hotmail.com
To: r.j.an...@btinternet.com;
...more
|
|
|
Joe Sorge <joe....@decisivedx.com>: Feb 04 05:44PM
I did a quick lit search for articles to support the idea that Doppler explains MM. Here is an interesting article.
Regards,
Joe
From: HARRY RICKER <kc...@yahoo.com>
Date: Wednesday, February
...more
|
|
|
Carl Reiff <cre...@elgenwave.com>: Feb 04 10:18AM -0800
Hi Akinbo,
I fear this could get a bit messy. In an attempt to ameliorate that, I
will reply in-line.
Kind regards,
Carl
----------------
On 2/4/2026 3:54 AM, Akinbo Ojo wrote:
...more
|
|
|
r.j.an...@btinternet.com r.j.an...@btinternet.com <r.j.an...@btinternet.com>: Feb 04 06:29PM
Quietism in Physics -
there are some things in Physics you are not supposed to talk about i.e.
you are supposed to be quiet about - Quietism
as per -
i.e. must be quiet about
...more
|
|
|
r.j.an...@btinternet.com r.j.an...@btinternet.com <r.j.an...@btinternet.com>: Feb 04 06:32PM
The method of mainstream physics community is to be quiet about certain
things - Quietism
------ Original Message ------
From: npa-rel...@googlegroups.com
...more
|
|
|
Stephan Gift <stepha...@uwi.edu>: Feb 04 06:55PM
Dear Joe,
Thank you for the Doppler paper. On page 11, in the derivation of his result, the author states,
“If we assume that the energy of light given by E = hf remains constant throughout the
...more
|
|
|
David Tombe <siri...@yahoo.com>: Feb 04 07:03PM
Harry, The MMX can't be explained by optical Doppler shift and Lorentz wasn't even considering that it was.
Lorentz was looking at length contraction of the
...more
|
|
|
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Feb 04 07:19PM
Hi Carl,
Yes, I agree can be messy and visibility can be diminished in a foggy environment. But it is not true that in a foggy environment, where equilibrium has been established, the ink particles
...more
|
|
|
Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com>: Feb 04 03:37PM -0700
Akinbo,
As I shared previously, I have no issues committing to the photon as a
packet of wave energy.
Light is created as a single event, such as an electron changing energy
levels in an atomic
...more
|
|
|
r.j.an...@btinternet.com r.j.an...@btinternet.com <r.j.an...@btinternet.com>: Feb 04 11:09PM
------ Original Message ------
From: npa-rel...@googlegroups.com
To: npa-rel...@googlegroups.com; ta...@hotmail.com;
frank...@yahoo.com Cc: verhey....@gmail.com;
...more
|
|
|
Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com>: Feb 04 04:28PM -0700
Franklin,
I have presented the arguments before you simply ignored them.
Now you try to address them with ambiguous rhetoric.
You speak incorrectly about the orientation of a receiving loop
...more
|
|
|
r.j.an...@btinternet.com r.j.an...@btinternet.com <r.j.an...@btinternet.com>: Feb 05 12:19AM
>> .... Time dilation. He [Lorentz} tried to sweep that under the carpet
>> under the cover of "local time" which he couldn't elaborate
>> on.<<
???
Me- Lorentz's view of local
...more
|
|
|
r.j.an...@btinternet.com r.j.an...@btinternet.com <r.j.an...@btinternet.com>: Feb 05 12:21AM
People here maybe using the same words such as "Lorentz's
theory"- but are using those words to mean different things
------ Original Message ------
From: npa-rel...@googlegroups.com
...more
|
|
|
r.j.an...@btinternet.com r.j.an...@btinternet.com <r.j.an...@btinternet.com>: Feb 05 12:41AM
As at 5 Feb - Norton still says threat and site can't be reached
------ Original Message ------
From: nper...@snet.net
To: frank...@yahoo.com; ta...@hotmail.com Cc:
verhey....@gmail.com;
...more
|
|
|
r.j.an...@btinternet.com r.j.an...@btinternet.com <r.j.an...@btinternet.com>: Feb 05 10:38AM
So, what I have so far-
Told AI that Einstein was wrong and should correct physics.
AI came up with what said was Unified theory (AUT- AI Unified Theory).
Asked it what does our
...more
|
|
|
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Feb 05 11:08AM
Cornelis,
Below reply appears to be either AI-assisted or AI-generated. It contains too much rhetoric, and contradiction, e.g. using photon and wave interchangeably.
As to whether “ink in
...more
|
|
|
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Feb 05 11:48AM
Hi Carl,
Does the animation you see in link below, compare with what is depicted as CMBR
...more
|
|
|
Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com>: Feb 05 06:24AM -0700
Akinbo,
Comments in line.
Cornelis Verhey
On Thu, Feb 5, 2026, 4:08 AM Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Cornelis,
> Below reply appears to be either AI-assisted or AI-generated.
...more
|