Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Jan 23 02:55PM
Roger A.,
I saw your reply where you try to use your AI to change the goal posts concerning what SR says about absolute preferred frame. Your AI has told a few untruths about HI.
I will look for a
...more
|
|
|
r.j.an...@btinternet.com r.j.an...@btinternet.com <r.j.an...@btinternet.com>: Jan 23 03:26PM
HI is a collection of contradictory claims.
------ Original Message ------
From: ta...@hotmail.com
To: r.j.an...@btinternet.com; kc...@yahoo.com;
npa-rel...@googlegroups.com;
...more
|
|
|
r.j.an...@btinternet.com r.j.an...@btinternet.com <r.j.an...@btinternet.com>: Jan 23 03:34PM
Also I did not "try" anything.
AI by its own volition split what we know as SR into two parts
(something that I would not have thought of) - first part is just the
...more
|
|
|
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Jan 23 04:13PM
Roger A.,
I will not be using my computer till tomorrow. Without teleguiding your AI, can you ask it, by starting a New Chat:
What was Einstein's view on absolute preferred frame of reference, and
...more
|
|
|
r.j.an...@btinternet.com r.j.an...@btinternet.com <r.j.an...@btinternet.com>: Jan 23 05:16PM
Akinbo
Einstein kept changing his mind about things.
And it all ends up as Chatgpt notes - can introduce a preferred frame.
What was Einstein's view on absolute
...more
|
|
|
r.j.an...@btinternet.com r.j.an...@btinternet.com <r.j.an...@btinternet.com>: Jan 23 06:15PM
>> Truth cannot be blocked forever.<<
Chatgpt says - not provable
------ Original Message ------
From: ta...@hotmail.com
To: frank...@yahoo.com; munda...@gmail.com;
...more
|
|
|
Roger Munday <munda...@gmail.com>: Jan 24 07:51AM +1300
Franklin
You say *in a post to me alone* :-
*" you can isolate the positrons and electrons experimentally."*
Provide us all with a link to such an experimental explanation.
Roger Munday
...more
|
|
|
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Jan 23 07:20PM
Roger A.,
Bottom line (one sentence) from ChatGPT
Einstein consistently denied the existence of an absolute preferred frame of reference, even after reintroducing a non-mechanical “ether” in
...more
|
|
|
r.j.an...@btinternet.com r.j.an...@btinternet.com <r.j.an...@btinternet.com>: Jan 23 11:49PM
Akinbo
relevant part was - >>philosophical choice<< -- so it wasn't physics
So, it being "false" still holds; it was false to think of it
as physics.
>> At the beginnings
...more
|
|
|
Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Jan 24 06:54AM
I wrote a whole paper about it:
https://franklinhu.com/PoselectronExperiments.pdf
Maybe you'll read it this time. It's called "pair production"
-Franklin
On Friday, January 23, 2026 at
...more
|
|
|
Frank Fernandes <aith...@gmail.com>: Jan 24 04:55AM -0500
Franklin,
Standard Physics describes pair production.
Electron-Positron pairs combine to produce gamma rays and vice versa.
Pair production is depicted by the charge squared equation developed
...more
|
|
|
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Jan 24 12:46PM
Hi Roger A., et.al.,
You (Roger) said, “That's what Einstein believed (i.e. philosophical choice that there is no absolute preferred frame of reference), but it wasn't physics”
...more
|