Groups keyboard shortcuts have been updated
Dismiss
See shortcuts

Re: [npa-relativity] Abridged summary of npa-relativity@googlegroups.com - 5 updates in 1 topic

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Shafiq Khan

unread,
May 1, 2025, 2:39:28 PMMay 1
to npa-rel...@googlegroups.com
What more evidence is required besides the scientific, philosophical and scriptural evidence given below. 
Quran is such a great and final word of Allah that the evidence of its divinity and secrets of physical and biological sciences were in just one verse. Read the verse (41-53) which means "Soon We shall show Our signs in the space and what is in their selves and then they will realise that this (meaning Quran) is truth and is not this enough that your Sustainer has the knowledge of everything?" The first sign is in the discovery of existence of aether, the electric dipoles, in space done through the scientific research paper published in peer-reviewed journal titled 'Michelson-Morley Experiment; A Misconceived and Misinterpreted Experiment' which is available in Indian Journal of Science and Technology with website address www.indjst.org besides many scientific websites. As the consequence of the discovery of aether in space all the physical sciences would require change.
Second sign has been given the name of 'energy' as it is allegorically mentioned as 'light' in Quran and is shown to be the only alternative which can explain the phenomena of life like consciousness, instincts, gowth, cell function, self-repair of cells etc., and above all biological laws in the scientific and philosophical paper titled 'Theory of Origin and Phenomenon of Life' published in the same as above-mentioned journal. However the paper is being revised in the 'Revised Theory of Origin and Phenomenon of Life' which is under preparation. As the consequence of this paper the biological sciences would require the changes.
This should be the sufficient scientific evidence of divinity of Quran and the existence of Allah as the Knower so Creator of everything in the universe.

On Thu, May 1, 2025, 7:00 PM <npa-rel...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
Roger Munday <munda...@gmail.com>: May 01 07:05AM +1200

Frank,
You say - *"The Void is infinite".*
How do you *know* this?
Roger Munday
 
...more
Frank Fernandes <aith...@gmail.com>: Apr 30 09:36PM -0400

Roger,
I have already answered your query -
 
*Infinite is that without a boundary. That which cannot be isolated even in
a math frame of reference. And even if we cut out a region in this void of ...more
Roger Munday <munda...@gmail.com>: May 01 04:03PM +1200

Frank,
*"Based on images of electrons impacting gold atoms."*
I do not consider that electrons exist, and they are *not* particles.
The transmission of light, and all radiant energy, is the ...more
Roger Munday <munda...@gmail.com>: May 01 04:12PM +1200

Add on:-
This is all explained in my "Continuous Magnetic Atoms" paper.
Here - https://romunpress.co.nz/romunnose/continuous-magnetic-atoms/
Roger Munday
 
...more
Frank Fernandes <aith...@gmail.com>: May 01 12:48AM -0400

Roger,
David Muller
<https://www.aep.cornell.edu/faculty-directory/david-anthony-muller> at
Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, and his colleagues captured this
image using a praseodymium ...more
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to npa-relativit...@googlegroups.com.

John-Erik Persson

unread,
May 1, 2025, 6:43:10 PMMay 1
to npa-rel...@googlegroups.com
Shafiq

The absurd Lorentz transform

John-Erik Persson

ask...@yahoo.se

In 1887 Lorenz stated, regarding Michelson’s interferometer, that in the arm transverse to the ether wind light must take a longer way due to the ether wind. Therefore, he also said that there is an effect of the ether wind also in the reference arm, and this effect is half the effect in the measuring arm. According to Michelson this effect in the reference arm does not exist. So, Michelson protested in vain, since most scientists supported Lorenz. This schism had the effect that Michelson had a nervous break-down.

Michelson’s reaction is understandable, since Lorenz was wrong, and the truth is that moving the detector cannot change the behavior of light. So, light takes the same way as before, and the only effect is that light hits another point on the detector. This change of position is falling inside the wave front and is therefore irrelevant. So, Lorenz mistake was devastating and we got the absurd Lorenz transform.

In 1905 Einstein accepted the absurd Lorenz transform, but invented another absurdity for motivating the theory. Einstein postulated that light can move with the same velocity in relation to all not accelerated observer motions. This theory is called the special theory of relativity. A remarkable property of this theory is that dilation of time is included. This means that two points in different positions can have different times. So, Newton’s concept with absolute time is conflicted.

So, Lorenz and colleagues (except Michelson) made a devastating mistake in 1887 by not understanding the wave model. The mistake regarding the reference arm in Michelson’s interferometer has been devastating to physics and Einstein’s modification of Lorenz’ theory has just made the error even more difficult to see.

We should have listened to Michelson.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325976477_Illusions_and_Reality_in_Relativity

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391279786_How_physics_was_damaged_by_Lorentz_and_Einstein


John-Erik


 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "npa-relativity" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to npa-relativit...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/npa-relativity/CAHYwPz11_2ty4JVhCrHeu%3DGM1PnYyzht_jN5VSZV2YDqU7Y8zw%40mail.gmail.com.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages