Re: [npa-relativity] Abridged summary of npa-relativity@googlegroups.com - 14 updates in 3 topics

[Shafiq Khan]

John-Erik Person

You are absolutely right, keep it up. Lorentz factor is the root cause of evolution of incorrect physics during the twentieth century and first quarter of the twenty-first century. 

With Regards 

Shafiq 

On Mon, Dec 15, 2025, 7:00 PM <npa-rel...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

npa-rel...@googlegroups.com

Google Groups

Today's topic summary
View all topics

• The meaning of U and the magnetic field. - 12 Updates
• Light duality, Lorentz transform. - 1 Update
• The Medium - 1 Update

The meaning of U and the magnetic field.

Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Dec 15 01:01AM I would once again argue that there isn't any E field as well. Is there any E field required for a radio signal to travel through a coaxial cable? How do you see radio signals travelling through ...more

Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com>: Dec 14 08:02PM -0700 " Franklin Hu's statement that there isn't any E field (Electric field) required for a radio signal to travel through a coaxial cable is incorrect in the context of the dominant mode of ...more

Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Dec 15 03:25AM Cornelis, That should tell you that your "standard electromagnetic" theory is wrong. It predicts that there should be zero current. However, if you actually did the experiment, you would see that ...more

Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Dec 15 04:04AM The easiest way to deal with the "thorniest problem" is to go back to your basic assumptions and show that they are wrong. The polarization of light DOES NOT show that light involves transverse ...more

Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Dec 15 04:11AM Akinbo, No, you are wrong again. You are once again, not reading what I said. A normal conductor only uses electrons and those oscillations would create a net magnetic field. But the aether ...more

Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Dec 15 04:22AM And once again AI is just spitting out the mainstream "opinion".  The conductor in the cable can only do "one" thing, which is to move electrons, so ultimately it can only be a simple flow of ...more

Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com>: Dec 14 10:37PM -0700 Franklin,   AI would like to respond to you "   Dear Franklin,   Thank you for continuing this discussion. Your perspective that the conductor's only job is to move electrons is correct, but it ...more

Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com>: Dec 14 10:59PM -0700 Franklin,   "So what do you think of that?" What I told you in the first place. Nothing has changed and you still can not measure a current leaving the end of the coaxial cable and into the ...more

Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Dec 15 06:19AM "Any signal being measured is due to the "bit of wire" behaving like an antenna which can have an alternating current induced in it due to electromagnetic induction."   That is the VERY thing which ...more

Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Dec 15 06:34AM That's very interesting about the speed differences, but dueling AI: The insulation (dielectric) in a coax cable changes transmission speed because its material properties, specifically ...more

Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Dec 15 09:00AM Franklin, et.al.,   In a transmission cable, both a wave in electric field E and in magnetic field B are propagated. This is unlike wireless transmission of energy through chargeless space. ...more

Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Dec 15 09:15AM Franklin,   Do you accept that seismic S-waves (transverse) can be polarized and P-waves (longitudinal) cannot?       You are yet to understand the concept of polarization, hence your saying, ...more

Back to top

Light duality, Lorentz transform.

John-Erik Persson <joer...@gmail.com>: Dec 14 10:10PM +0100 Dear Prof. Danielsson at University of Uppsala, Sweden Dear members of the npa-relativity group   In my opinion the idea of light duality presented by Niels Bohr is wrong. I think that the known ...more

Back to top

The Medium

Roger Munday <munda...@gmail.com>: Dec 15 06:36AM +1300 So according to the statements by physicists, in their books about the ultimate structure of matter, they collectively believe that atoms are kinetic and are in continuous motion in a universal ...more

Back to top

You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to npa-relativit...@googlegroups.com.

[John-Erik Persson]

Shafiq

Thanks for support

I send to Prof. Danielsson also

John-Erik

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "npa-relativity" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to npa-relativit...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/npa-relativity/CAHYwPz2y9st8rQxby%2BJXAwWqUKetbXZmzt7rggEfb0jtTnWQ%3Dw%40mail.gmail.com.