Re: [npa-relativity] Abridged summary of npa-relativity@googlegroups.com - 9 updates in 4 topics

5 views
Skip to first unread message

Shafiq Khan

unread,
Dec 11, 2025, 10:00:00 AM12/11/25
to npa-rel...@googlegroups.com
Dear John-Erik 
I have shown the existence of aether in my paper titled 'Michelson-Morley Experiment; A Misconceived and Misinterpreted Experiment' which is published in a peer-reviewed journal. Now if you want to see the aether physically then look at the street light at night which is a bit far off and stress your eyes you will see the rainbow type of shinning substance surrounding the light. That is aether.
Everything you suggest is already done like explanation of gravity, unification of forces of nature in the paper titled 'Foundation of Theory of Everything; Non-living Things and Living Things' . How long mainstream physicists will fool the world. I have taken a vow that truth will be made to prevail sooner or later come what may. 
With Regards 
Shafiq 

On Thu, Dec 11, 2025, 7:00 PM <npa-rel...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
David Tombe <siri...@yahoo.com>: Dec 11 11:47AM

Cornelis,              I've never used the Lamb shift in any of my arguments.
              As regards what you say about the electron-positron sea being a substitute for quantum
...more
r.j.an...@btinternet.com r.j.an...@btinternet.com <r.j.an...@btinternet.com>: Dec 10 01:48PM

On Saturday 30 Nov (?)-  I only dealt with 2 philosophies to keep things
simple.
 
Below is some more philosophies and what their view on Special
relativity (SR) is -> 
 
 
Philosophy
...more
r.j.an...@btinternet.com r.j.an...@btinternet.com <r.j.an...@btinternet.com>: Dec 10 01:50PM

29th
------ Original Message ------
From: r.j.an...@btinternet.com
To: ta...@hotmail.com; frank...@yahoo.com Cc:
verhey....@gmail.com; andre...@gmail.com; siri...@yahoo.com;
...more
Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com>: Dec 10 07:25AM -0700

Franklin,
 
Let me repeat.
 
The point where a conductor is open-circuited (like the "open end" of a
meter) is a current node where the conduction current is zero. Therefore
your understanding
...more
Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com>: Dec 10 10:04PM -0700

Akinbo, et.al.,
 
 
I sent a similar animation of circular polarization as it dynamically
demonstrates how rotational polarization is created.
 
 
I see no reason to disagree with Maxwell's
...more
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Dec 11 08:51AM

Cornelis,
 
I saw your below comments, but I couldn’t see the attached files
 
“I sent a similar animation of circular polarization as it dynamically demonstrates how rotational polarization is
...more
Shafiq Khan <shaf...@gmail.com>: Dec 10 10:28PM +0530

Dear All,
 
Most of the scientists on ResearchGate and elsewhere are allergic to
invoking the name of Creator. To clarify my position I would like to inform
you all how and why I invoke the name of
...more
John-Erik Persson <joer...@gmail.com>: Dec 11 01:19AM +0100

Dear *Shafic Kahn* and all
 
You are right Shafic, Big Bang is nonsense. But you need to explain the
cosmic red shift without that nonsense. We must also explain gravity.
A material body absorbs
...more
John-Erik Persson <joer...@gmail.com>: Dec 10 03:42PM +0100

THE LORENTZ transform has been in conflict with the wave model since 1887.
Tell me what you think about this important question.
John-Erik
 
 
On Tue, Dec 9, 2025 at 8:24 PM John-Erik Persson
...more
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to npa-relativit...@googlegroups.com.

Shafiq Khan

unread,
Dec 11, 2025, 10:12:06 AM12/11/25
to npa-rel...@googlegroups.com
Dear John-Erik, 

Lorentz factor is the root cause of evolution of incorrect physics in the twentieth century. It has been experimentally shown that Lorentz factor is manipulation and not valid. The experiments are quoted in my paper titled Experimental and Theoretical Evidence of Fallacy of Space-time Concept and Actual State of Existence of the Physical Universe. 
You are absolutely correct and please keep it up we will win soon. 
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages