CO2 foolishness
uitterdijk
Dear physicists and climate scientists, CO2 foolishness
I herewith refer to my book "Living Room Model" in which I provide alternative insights into the causes of atmospheric warming and the Earth's relatively thin crust, particularly that of the oceans. I use only publicly available measurements, supported by generally accepted physical and mathematical tools. *
Several highly unexpected conclusions emerged from this research, of which the most remarkables ones are shown below.
-It is, physically speaking, impossible that the very low concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere causes a temperature increase in as well itself as in Earth’s crust, realising that the last mentioned one requires about hundred times more energy than the first mentioned one. On top of this that energy is in the Greenhouse Model ultimately supposed to flow from cold to hot, given the very high temperature of Earth’s core. A more likely process is that instead the atmosphere releases directly its heat in the opposite direction: to the very cold universe.
-Earth’s hot core causes a heat flow from core to universe too. For that reason Earth has cooled down in the past billion years. When that heat flow is “hindered” by an increased temperature of the atmosphere it will cause a temperature increase at Earth’s surface. This increase equals the increase of the temperature of the atmosphere near that surface and decreases with depth. A basically comparable situation is a river flowing into a sea of which its level varies with the tide. The level of the water in the estuary rises and falls with the level of the sea. The further inland, the less remains in the river of that varying level in the estuary. In the case of global warming, there is no 'ebb tide'!
-It has been proven by physical and mathematical means that the atmosphere can be heated directly and amply by human energy consumption. The corresponding calculation is based on the physical law that all consumed energy, regardless of its nature, is ultimately converted into heat.
-The global monthly average concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere shows each year a sinusoidal variation, superimposed on the annual average, with the very small amplitude of 2 ppm. This phenomenon appears to be caused by the winter half-year in the Northern Hemisphere, during which CO2 absorption by nature there falls to a very low level. It can therefore be concluded that if the NH were reduced to a lunar landscape, while maintaining human activity, the annual average CO2 level would increase by only a few ppm. See the one page attachment for a bit more details.
Kind regards,
Sjaak Uitterdijk
* The book is shown at https://sites.google.com/view/sjaakuitterdijkbibliography/books and at https://independent.academia.edu/Uitterdijk