Re: [npa-relativity] Abridged summary of npa-relativity@googlegroups.com - 8 updates in 1 topic

[Shafiq Khan]

Hi All, 

I have shown the existence of aether in my paper titled 'Michelson-Morley Experiment; A Misconceived and Misinterpreted Experiment' which is published in a peer-reviewed journal. Now if you want to see the aether physically then look at the street light at night which is a bit far off and stress your eyes you will see the rainbow type of shinning substance surrounding the light. That is aether, the electric dipoles and the fifth constituent of the universe besides matter, space, time and light/radiation.

With Regards 

Shafiq 

On Tue, Jan 6, 2026, 7:00 PM <npa-rel...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

npa-rel...@googlegroups.com

Google Groups

Today's topic summary
View all topics

• The meaning of U and the magnetic field. - Polarization doesn't require transverse waves - 8 Updates

The meaning of U and the magnetic field. - Polarization doesn't require transverse waves

Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com>: Jan 05 12:12PM -0700 Franklin,   As pointed out in *previous emails* all this speculation fails to explain the signal in the *DIPOLE* antenna in* your own video you shared*! The correct understanding of the *DIPOLE* ...more

Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com>: Jan 05 12:55PM -0700 Franklin,   You confuse wave frequency with wave speed! Even a 1hz radio wave, if you could produce one, would still propagate at the speed of light!   Your also confusing stereo (multiple ...more

Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Jan 05 08:14PM Cornelis, My point remains that the wave speed is irrelevant. Only the oscillation rate would matter to a stationary detector. Or you could create a standing wave and then run your detector along the ...more

Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Jan 05 08:25PM Cornelis, How does the video fail to explain the signal caused by a cylindrical longitudinal wavefront? As I said before, the antenna is directly across from the transmitter, it drives one end which ...more

Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com>: Jan 05 04:20PM -0700 It's all already been discussed and refuted Franklin. The email written over 2 weeks ago and was just found still in my outbox.   Cornelis Verhey   ...more

Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Jan 05 11:42PM I don't recall any discussion other than you just asserting it doesn't work which doesn't count as an argument. Well repaste it if it actually addressed the argument I just made below. ...more

Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com>: Jan 05 05:59PM -0700 Franklin,   There have been 8 emails sent from me alone since 2 weeks ago when that email was put into my outbox. You choose to ignore the conflicts pointed out in them and now refuse to ...more

Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com>: Jan 05 10:43PM -0700 Franklin,   Your point has been refuted as a strawman demand. You demand proof of a magnetic field in a radio wave while rejecting the very tool required to observe it. ​Electromagnetic waves ...more

Back to top

You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to npa-relativit...@googlegroups.com.