Fwd: Your fireside chat for "Atomic clocks dependent..." is ready to view!

[John-Erik Persson]

To NPA relativity members:

ABSURD TIME DILATION IS NOT NEEDED

If an electron is circulating in an ether wind, v, it is moving in one of two  dimensions with the speed c+v and c-v the effect of the ether wind on frequency becomes half of the effect in a motion force and back in the ether ewind. So, we get a frequency dependency of:

f'=f.(1-v^/2c^2)

 theory of relativity says instead:

f'=f.sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)

and these two equations are almost equal, since   v<<c.   So, assuming an ether predicts the same as the absurd concept of time dilation.

So, assuming an ether gives a correct prediction by concepts from classical physics.

ASSUMING AN ETHER IS A RATIONAL EXPLANATION, and we do not have to commit violence against an absolute space.

What do you think?

John-Erik Persson

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: In Depth with Academia <upd...@academia-mail.com>
Date: Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 3:51 PM
Subject: Your fireside chat for "Atomic clocks dependent..." is ready to view!
To: <joer...@gmail.com>

Your fireside chat is ready to view! Atomic clocks dependent on the ether wind (modified Listen to fireside chat ▸ 580 California St., Suite 400, San Francisco, CA, 94104 Unsubscribe   Privacy Policy   Terms of Service   © 2026 Academia

                                                           

[John-Erik Persson]

All members

See attachment

John-Erik Persson

[John-Erik Persson]

Members

• Bound electrons move forth and back in relation to the ether wind in one dimension of two
• Two-way light speed is v.sqrt( 1-v^2/c^2)
• Effect on bound electrons is half the effect on electrons (or light) moving forth and back
• Effect on bound electrons = v.sqrt(1-v^2/2c^2)
• Atomic clocks depend on the ether wind
• Ether wind dependency explains behavior of clocks in the GPS system

We do not need absurd time dilation

Einstein was wrong

See attachment regarding atomic clocks

Tell me what you think

John-Erik Persson