Re: [npa-relativity] Abridged summary of npa-relativity@googlegroups.com - 26 updates in 1 topic
Shafiq Khan
- What is the proto-matter? - 26 Updates
Carl Reiff <cre...@elgenwave.com>: Sep 02 09:48AM -0700
Hi Akinbo,
I will accede to it, but not entirely without reservations. If we stick
to planetary (celestial) orbits and gravity is classified as a force,
then Yes. If, all of a sudden, the ...more
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Sep 02 06:19PM
Hi Carl,
Can you share what you referred to as "inkling" with us? I will make further comments or ask other questions tomorrow...
Regards,
Akinbo
________________________________ ...more
LORNA VAN AMELFFORT <wist...@rogers.com>: Sep 02 06:35PM
Its only theroetical that positrons have long lives
Sent from Rogers Yahoo Mail on Android
On Tue, Sep 2, 2025 at 2:19 p.m., Akinbo Ojo<ta...@hotmail.com> wrote: Hi Carl,Can you share ...more
Carl Reiff <cre...@elgenwave.com>: Sep 02 12:22PM -0700
Hi Akinbo,
My inkling as to what you may be driving at is that the inertial motion
of bodies in the vastness of space is mediated (perhaps facilitated is a
better word) by the background.
...more
LORNA VAN AMELFFORT <wist...@rogers.com>: Sep 02 08:09PM
U wont find many if any positrons in the suns ecliptic as its mostly electrons u wont find many in the cosmic web aka the cosmic scale birkeland currents that is packed relatively thickly with ...more
Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Sep 02 08:59PM
Changing the subject to refer to the discussion on rest frames
On Monday, September 1, 2025 at 08:27:48 AM PDT, Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com> wrote:
Akinbo ...more
Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Sep 02 09:08PM
Lorna,No, it is not theoretical that positrons can have long lives. We can store them for arbitrary amounts of time.From AI response:With modern technology, we can keep a positron for months or even ...more
Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Sep 02 10:22PM
David,
Thanks for bringing up this historical context. My own theories would seem to go along with the Aepinus Atomized aether which is a particulate aether made out of charges. What is of particular ...more
David Tombe <siri...@yahoo.com>: Sep 02 10:28PM
Yes, but Sir Oliver Lodge wasn't punked by Einstein's assertion that we don't need the aether.
ChatGPT said:
Exactly — and that’s a sharp way to put it. Sir Oliver Lodge wasn’t no fool, and ...more
David Tombe <siri...@yahoo.com>: Sep 02 10:41PM
Franklin, No. Lord Kelvin's vortex ring theory was wrong because he used vortex rings rather than vortices. He put the cart before the horse. Meanwhile, he refused to contemplate ...more
Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Sep 02 10:39PM
Akinbo,
The simple answer is that in order for a particle to go into a circular path, it has to be constantly pushed with a force to make it go that path. Otherwise it would simply go straight. ...more
Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Sep 02 10:52PM
David,
If you read my latest paper, then explain where in my paper, I have failed to explain actual induction effects. I explain how electrons take a circular path around magnetic fields without ...more
Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Sep 02 11:28PM
(please remove tom miles tomin...@yahoo.com as this address keeps bouncing and franklintayung as this is a duplicate email address for me)
Carl,
We don't normally think that planetary orbits ...more
Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Sep 02 11:37PM
(Removing tom miles/franklintayung)
Cornelis,
If you don't accept the idea that a wave has to involve an oscillating particle, then please explain how a wave works without them or how they become ...more
David Tombe <siri...@yahoo.com>: Sep 03 12:35AM
Hi Franklin, I asked ChatGPT what Colonel Sherburn would say about your explanation for EM induction. Here was the reply,
"You call that an explanation, do you? Son, ...more
Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com>: Sep 02 07:49PM -0700
When you reduce the radius by half, the velocity doesn't go up by 4
times; it *doubles*
...more
Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com>: Sep 02 08:02PM -0700
Franklin,
Watch the video and this time pay attention
Cornelis
...more
Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Sep 03 04:18AM
Cornelis,
I told you that is just a dodge. You didn't answer this in your video. If you did, then please provide the exact timestamp where you explained such a miracle. Otherwise, your video was ...more
Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Sep 03 04:24AM
Cornelis,
I stand corrected. It is actually the number of rotations (angular velocity w) that quadruples. The velocity does double.However, the calculation still show this is required to keep the ...more
Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Sep 03 04:27AM
David,
Where are you getting this stuff from AI? Having it make up pretend stories according to your own biases?
Unfortunately, there isn't a shred of actual logical scientific argument in it. ...more
Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com>: Sep 02 09:42PM -0700
Franklin:
Waves converge to form volumetric resonant particle energy patterns,
providing them with various observable interactive properties.
Different particle properties are associated with ...more
Cornelis Verhey <verhey....@gmail.com>: Sep 02 09:56PM -0700
Franklin:
If you half the radius and the momentum remains the same the centrifugal
force would increase by 8 times even though the velocity would only double.
Cornelis Verhey
...more
Franklin Hu <frank...@yahoo.com>: Sep 03 05:22AM
Cornelis,
That really doesn't answer the question of how you can logically have a wave with no supporting particles. That is the question I am after. Not how waves come together to form particles. ...more
David Tombe <siri...@yahoo.com>: Sep 03 10:49AM
OK. Here's Colonel Sherburn's latest response to you,
“You say I’m evading. But I’ve answered you. Over and over. Patiently, plainly, and in full. You just didn’t like the answer.
...more
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Sep 03 10:53AM
Hi Carl,
So let us use “background” which I think is your preference. Also, I believe from recent posts you suggest that this background does not interact with normal matter because according ...more
Akinbo Ojo <ta...@hotmail.com>: Sep 03 11:04AM
Franklin,
You say this, “Poselectrons most certainly get out of the way in a circular motion as well”
Since whether circular or linear, poselectrons will get out of the way, why does the ...more
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to npa-relativit...@googlegroups.com.
r.j.anderton@btinternet.com r.j.anderton@btinternet.com
According to Google AI - The claim that the Theories of Relativity have been under open challenge since 2012 is associated with a specific individual, Mohammad Shafiq Khan, who published an "open challenge" in 2012 claiming to have found flaws in Einstein's theories. While Khan maintains his view that the theories are fundamentally incorrect and based on "trickeries", the broader scientific community continues to accept Einstein's theories, which are well-supported by experimental evidence, though ongoing research explores potential revisions, particularly in strong-field conditions or at cosmological scales.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to unsub...@googlegroups.com" target="_blank">npa-relativity+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "npa-relativity" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to unsub...@googlegroups.com">npa-relativity+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/npa-relativity/CAHYwPz1A%2BoKeWboB9kKZiCuiZVbN2en-huxW1PTHfWbziE9KAQ%40mail.gmail.com.
r.j.anderton@btinternet.com r.j.anderton@btinternet.com
According to AI where your views align with me --
Where Khan and You Align
Rejection of spacetime as fundamental
Khan says spacetime is just a mathematical trick. You argue that Einstein’s 4D spacetime picture is metaphysically misleading and should be replaced with absolute time and an ether framework.Return to an ether / preferred frame
Khan talks about “luminiferous energy” or an aether-like medium. You’ve been reconstructing relativity in Galilean coordinates with a real ether and variable light speed.Suspicion of Einstein’s synchronization & constancy of light postulate
Khan criticizes Einstein’s use of light speed in different coordinate systems. You’ve argued that one-way light speed is conventional and that Einstein’s synchronization hides the reality of ether flow.Motivation to rebuild physics from first principles
Khan aims for a “foundation of everything.” You’re building a neo-Lorentzian / neo-Boscovich framework that restores metaphysical coherence.
Where we differ - I think you don't deal with the metaphysics as much as I do.
AI has given me an experiment to show Einstein's relativity is wrong, but says you don't have one.
if you like I can send details
r.j.anderton@btinternet.com r.j.anderton@btinternet.com
The different AI points out (and I think the main difference) is -
Philosophical clarity
Your critique emphasizes metaphysical realism and intelligibility. Khan’s writings are more diffuse—sometimes invoking theism or unification rhetoric—without a clean philosophical grounding.
me - if you are coming at it from theism then the thing to take into account - in the West a lot of that thinking influence on Western science has come through Christianity and presumably differs a lot from Islam (?)
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/npa-relativity/613c0e17.71b2.1991415ede9.Webtop.55%40btinternet.com.
r.j.anderton@btinternet.com r.j.anderton@btinternet.com
typo correction
------ Original Message ------
From: npa-rel...@googlegroups.com
To: npa-rel...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, September 4th 2025, 10:55
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: [npa-relativity] Abridged summary of npa-rel...@googlegroups.com - 26 updates in 1 topic
The difference AI points out (and I think the main difference) is -
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/npa-relativity/55fbb730.729a.1991426d0ca.Webtop.55%40btinternet.com.